The Zeiss 15 and VC 15 are so close now with version III not sure the Zeiss makes a big difference . The VC 15 is under hyped. It's really good
tsdevine wrote:
Mine is the ZE 15, Loxia 21, Batis 25, SMC Pentax 28 f/3.5 K, FE 35 2.8, FE 55, G90, and CV125
The zooms I occasionally use are the FE 16-35 and EF 70-200 f/4L IS. I could substitute the FE 16-35 for the Batis 25 when I need AF...as long as I don't need speed. I could substitute the FE 16-35 for the ZE 15 as well, when I don't want to lug it around.
So the Batis starts looking like the odd man out. Or I could pickup the CV15 for when I don't want to lug the ZE, and then use the Batis for when I want AF. Then the FE 16-35 starts being the odd man out. But the 16-35 is so versatile it doesn't seem to make as much sense.
Anyway..I guess this is starting to veer off topic.
-Tim
...Show more →GMPhotography wroteRight now currently I have the Vc15, Loxia 21, Sony 28, Sony 35 1.4 and Batis 85. Oh 24-70 f4 but I expect to change to 85 1.4 and the 24-70 2.8 depending on IQ.
It's a matter of comfort level. When I test I open up though.
gyoung143 wrote: GMPhotography wrotegyoung143 wrotenandadevieast wroteFiddling with stting aperture after focussing may throw off the focus...?
nampramos wroteFocus wide-open and then set the lens to f8.Normal technique with such as adapted Leica lenses and I haven't had any problems. The lack of auto aperture really puts me off the Loxias, I might as well use adapted lenses
GerryGerry you may want to try renting one as it sounds funky it's really actually quite good . I really have no trouble focusing these Loxia glass stopped down. I'm always deadly with regards to focus with them too. Now I wish for a Loxia 28I have tried it, but always come back to focussing at full aperture, it gives me greater confidence that I have 'nailed it'!
For me down in these super wides like 15/21 I would rather have manual focus lenses because I'm not shooting PR stuff this wide but more landscape type work with filters and such. And for the most part on tripods. 24 through 85 area would be more AF kind of work.
As far as the 16-35 goes it's a nice lens but my CV 15 and I know the 21 will be better than the zoom plus the Batis 25 these are lenses that are simply better and faster. Although I think the best zoom to date from Sony it's more of a happy medium lens. Plus at the long end its not great
Loxia is weighed towards video as well as still photography. Do videographers use UWA lenses? If yes, I can't see why Zeiss wouldn't give them what they want.
It's surprising how few people seem to have the lens. Searching for "21mm Loxia" on 500.px results in 4 images. There are more on Flickr but that many an no "killer" landscape shots yet. Do you think the 16-35/4 might be too hard to compete with for Sony landscapers?
hauxon wrote:
It's surprising how few people seem to have the lens. Searching for "21mm Loxia" on 500.px results in 4 images. There are more on Flickr but that many an no "killer" landscape shots yet. Do you think the 16-35/4 might be too hard to compete with for Sony landscapers?
That's not surprising at all. Only very few lenses were available yet. Not a single store has them in stock over here. They can't even tell me when they expect to get it.
Mine come today waiting fro Brown truck to roll up but i am planning a shoot tomorrow and ill get some images up and even some raws for folks to play with.
Question on my 21 the blue seal seems to extend past the mount slightly. It's different than the 35 and 50. Just wondering if it's normal. It's also very tight to put on and off which that does not bother me as it's making a nice weather proof seal but the blue does go past the mount slightly. Still deciding on using its hood or one of my cheapie setups as its tight but not super tight on the hood.
Ever time I grab a Loxia lens it just feels so nice. Crap I may buy the 35 and 50 again. With the new 24-70 now that hoping is killer I could even do manual lenses in 21,35,50. Keep the 28 and new 85 1.4 in AF plus add the zoom for AF and that just might work. I get two lens kits one manual one AF
Mine is tighter to mount than my other lenses, and I assumed that was partially due to the weather seal. When mounted though, my seal is pretty close to being flush with the mount.
-Tim
GMPhotography wrote:
Question on my 21 the blue seal seems to extend past the mount slightly. It's different than the 35 and 50. Just wondering if it's normal. It's also very tight to put on and off which that does not bother me as it's making a nice weather proof seal but the blue does go past the mount slightly. Still deciding on using its hood or one of my cheapie setups as its tight but not super tight on the hood.