sebboh wrote: uhoh7 wroteTonite I missed a very simple shot with the CV 35/1.2 in low light because of the EVF noise.but would you have been able to hit it manual focusing with a dslr?
uhoh7 wrote: sebboh wroteuhoh7 wroteTonite I missed a very simple shot with the CV 35/1.2 in low light because of the EVF noise.but would you have been able to hit it manual focusing with a dslr?Never had one
just stick a 6 stop ND filter and a macro tube on the front of your m9's viewfinder and imagine there's no rangefinder patch to get an idea what it would be like.
uhoh7 wrote:
As to WATE vs other stuff: On the Leicas it's widely considered not at the level of ZM18 or SEM18, and certainly not like the SEM21, which is the strongest UWA M lens ever made. But the WATE is very good. And obviously it's been way better than those lenses on the stock sonys.
Charlie, I fully agree with your statement above, except that I felt the Elmar 24 to be slightly better than the SEM 21. Except at 21mm of course...:-) Or could it have been down to the two lenses I tried out?
Well more testing is going to be needed which is hard in London at the moment as the light is so bad and I only managed a few shots yesterday.
As to focusing yes in some ways this is more of a pain on the UWA's manually but I find having a proper focus scale helps BUT it is a real shame that the focus throw on the lens is so short from the 2m to infinity stop with no further distance markings as this makes zone focussing of any mid distance object very difficult. On a plus note it would appear that the infinity stop is an infinity stop unlike the other Loxia's
According to Zeiss the Loxia 21/2.8 has a focus throw of 90 degrees compared to approximately 180 degrees for the Loxia 35/2 and 50/2 lenses. The ZM Biogon 21/2.8 has markings for 2m, 8ft, 15ft, 5m and infinity and a better focus throw.
pdmphoto wrote:
Honestly, not impressed for f/4 at 1:1. The upper RHS is noticeably less sharp than the upper LHS. The focus on that shot looks like a mess.
Would loved to have seen the above view at various apertures. So easy to see the performance across the frame in such a shot, but I can't find many like that. Of course I'd never use 2.8 for such a shot, but it's a good test nonetheless. I'd hope it's alot better at f/4, the SEM 21 is very strong on the edges at 3.4
They are on the same focus plane and are the same subject matter (wire strands with lights). One stop down from wide open. Wide open MTF's show outstanding performance. f/4 should be better.
Thanks Gary and Philippe!
The first serious test of this lens will be in May when I to travel again to the Lofoten for a couple of days.
On my upcoming trip in December I will take again the D800E and the 21mm ZF.2. Changing to a completely new system a couple of days before a trip is not a good idea in my opinion.
Nice Boris, I'll have mine too tomorrow. I didn't even preorder. My usual dealer had one copy in stock all of a sudden.
If it doesn't disappoint I'm probably selling my 25 Batis.
Jochenb wrote:
Nice Boris, I'll have mine too tomorrow. I didn't even preorder. My usual dealer had one copy in stock all of a sudden.
If it doesn't disappoint I'm probably selling my 25 Batis.
Well... you can ignore this post. The store sold my reserved copy to someone else this afternoon. I already fully paid for it and all. That's just great.
Jochenb wrote: Jochenb wroteNice Boris, I'll have mine too tomorrow. I didn't even preorder. My usual dealer had one copy in stock all of a sudden.
If it doesn't disappoint I'm probably selling my 25 Batis.Well... you can ignore this post. The store sold my reserved copy to someone else this afternoon. I already fully paid for it and all. That's just great.
There was a question to your blog post about focusing the Loxia 21/2.8 between 2m and infinity. I too would like to hear more about that, if possible. How does this affect the practical use of the Loxia 21/2.8? This is the only thing that might hold me back regarding this lens.
The focusing throw from 2m to infinty is better on the Zeiss ZM Biogon 21/2.8, so I wonder why Zeiss has changed this when making an E mount lens. The same trend can be seen on the Voigtländer superwides, 15/4.5 and 12/5.6 lenses. On www.voigtlaender.de images of both the E mount and M mount versions of these two lenses are up now. I hope this will not be a trend going forward. As it is now the focus-by-wire lenses offer a longer focus throw, e.g. Zeiss Batis 25/2 and the Sony/Zeiss 16-35/4.