RustyBug Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
The use of reflective metering and EC in concert with each other and all the subsequent calculations.
If we know that ETTR is our friend for shadows, but it puts our highlights at risk a bit. Just get your ETTR exposure as you normally would and then pull back one stop for the -1. Then skip 3 and skip 3 more. Simple.
The reason for the three stop skips is that it puts your adjustments @ +/- 1.5 stop overlap (i.e. less than two stops) for push / pull. Also, the three stops represents roughly the natural difference for a proper exposure between Sunny 16 and shade/shadow side @ key vs. fill. And because we are going to bracket for more light in our shadows anyway, we really don't need to "tempt fate" with a full push all the way to ETTR.
The reason that our scene's dynamic range is so great, it is because we are trying to get an exposure for different lighting portions within the scene that have different light levels. So, in one area we might have key / fill at three stops (natural relationship), then that same fill lighting may very well be the key lighting in another area with its subsequent remnant of fill @ its shadow side.
If you don't want to go the ETTR -1 route, then you can determine your brightest incident key lighting (by meter or knowledge @ EV lighting conditions) and skip 3 and skip 3.
I understand that spot metering your brightest value with a reflective meter puts you @ middle gray, then you are adding in two stops of EC (which is 3 stops for the adjustment from reflective metering middle gray, to -1 stop for protection @ total + two stops above the spot meter to get to the same place that I'm at with ETTR -1).
I just find that incorporating camera EC calculations is an extra degree of convolution.
Hopefully, that made sense. But of course, asking me to explain things ... that always comes with an extra degree of convolution, too.
|