Hmm . . . I just realized that now that I own the 15/4.5 VM and 40/1.4 VM I can post those here taken withe the A7RII! Plus my F-mount 90/3.5CV SL-II and 180/4 APO. I better get busy using them!
I regret that those magnificent willowherbs (Chamaenerion angustifolium,Epilobium angustifolium) have mostly disappeared from South-Western Polish Mountains.
And to follow-up, here's a three image stitch pano with the 180/4 CV. Atmospherics certainly did not help the sharpness, but it's reasonably sharp at this image size with some very light sharpening PS6.
Here's one of my daughter posing for a picture for school (when it starts week after next) taken with the 40/1.4VM at f/4 I believe with a polarizer held over the front of the lens since I did not have the correct step-up ring:
I noticed some here have the 180/4 APO-Lanthar. I recently picked up the Leica 180/3.4 APO-Telyt. I haven't used it much yet, but where I have, it's mostly been at or near infinity landscape type photos. Seems to be very good, at least in comparison to my Canon 70-200/4 IS. But it's very similar in size and weight. Was kind of hoping for something a bit smaller, if not lighter. The 180/4 seems to be a very nice, relatively small size. I've read a few differing opinions about how it performs vs. the 180/3.4, with some thinking the Leica is better at distance, but the 180/4 improves at nearer distances.
Wondering if anyone has owned or compared both and can offer some insight?
I thought the 180/3.4 would scratch this particular itch, but am now wondering about the 180/4...
BTW, received the new Voigtlander 35/1.7 Ultron just before dusk and was able to quickly try it out in terms of background rendering...
