Thanks for starting this thread. It's interesting to see how these lenses show the world. I'll probably never buy one, but they're a nice option to have.
I'm surprised/disappointed not to see anything from the Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye here. I really should pull the trigger on this for a bit of fun. Reviews show that once stopped down it's far better than the Nikon 16mm Fisheye in the corners/edges and more than equally sharp in the centre.
Frogfish wrote:
I'm surprised/disappointed not to see anything from the Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye here. I really should pull the trigger on this for a bit of fun. Reviews show that once stopped down it's far better than the Nikon 16mm Fisheye in the corners/edges and more than equally sharp in the centre.
Anyone have any comments/shots on this lens ?
I own both of these lenses (plus the Samyang 7.5 and Nikkor 10.5 FEs: VR panos). The Zenitar is rubbish. It's true that from F8 it's scraping by on a 12 Mp body but it's still pretty awful in all significant respects. The 16mm Nikon AIS isn't that great either but it's streets ahead of the Ukrainian lump. I recall that I had to mess around with the Zenitar to get it to focus at infinity too.
Of the four FEs I've owned and used the 10.5 Nikkor is the best but the Samyang (MFT) is almost as good at < half the price.
Roy