Sony FE Images Thread
p.917 #1Sony FE Images Thread
phigment wrote:
rji2goleez,
Cool timing on those maroon cars.
Sometimes it's better to be lucky than good!
rji2goleez,
Cool timing on those maroon cars.
Sometimes it's better to be lucky than good!
Jun 05, 2015 at 08:53 AM
p.917 #2Sony FE Images Thread
Many excellent pictures again these last pages everyone! Don't think I have ever put so many likes in one go before.
navmannz wrote:
I already have a QBM Distagon 35/2.8, a Minolta MC 35/1.8 and a Schneider Retina Curtagon 35/2.8 but the concave FD 35/2 especially seems to have a big following from what I read online.
The FD 24/2 is another one that's supposed to be very good an I am keeping an eye out for that too. I have an FDn 24/2.8 which I found a bit disappointing especially compared to the FDn 20/2.8 and 28/2 which are both excellent on the a7 (may be just my copy of the 24/2.8 though since most people seem to think the 20/2.8 and 24/2.8 are very close in quality).This one might give you an idea of the bokeh of the 35 F/2. I was walking back along the beach dicing with the waves that were coming in onto the only hard sand that offered easy walking - I set it on F/2.8 from memory, set the focus at about 3 m, and took a couple to explore the effect. I find it hard to escape the impression that there is something funny going on here with reverse curvature of the field of sharp focus - look at the waves on the far left and the houses top right,...Show more →
Thanks for the samples!
That looks strange indeed, edges look quite a bit more in focus than the center.
As I said before I'm not really bothered all that much by far corner sharpness. What does bother me is the behavior of the FE 28-70 for instance. My copy at least had a very sharp center, then a less sharp donut ring, then an area of greater sharpness again before sharpness falling off in the corners again. I have seen this behavior from a few other lenses too.
ManuelLaMantia wrote:
I do like the FDn 28/2 a lot though.I'm with you on that - I think its a under-rated lens - the FD 35 F/2 the same...
John
Haven't tried the FD 35/2 yet but I'm keeping an eye out for one. I suppose you are referring to the concave version?I have the so-called new FD 35 F/2, and I find it a fantastic performer - sharp into the corners from about 5.6 and with very little purple fringing. It's very similar overall to the 28 F/2 though I find the far corners on the 28 not quite as good. There's an assessment of the 35 F/2 on an A7R at http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4364.
JohnThanks for the info! Will read your link. The far corners are not that important to me, I usually shoot a little wide if possible which leaves me some room to crop extreme corners if sharpness there is critical (which is not that often anyway). I'm more interested in the rendering/color/bokeh.
I already have a QBM Distagon 35/2.8, a Minolta MC 35/1.8 and a Schneider Retina Curtagon 35/2.8 but the concave FD 35/2 especially seems to have a big following from what I read online.
The FD 24/2 is another one that's supposed to be very good an I am keeping an eye out for that too. I have an FDn 24/2.8 which I found a bit disappointing especially compared to the FDn 20/2.8 and 28/2 which are both excellent on the a7 (may be just my copy of the 24/2.8 though since most people seem to think the 20/2.8 and 24/2.8 are very close in quality).Some old pics and some re-post about wonderful Canon FDn 35mm f/2... especially for bokeh aspect...
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140529_londra_canarywharf_001_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_heathrowt5_006_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_heathrowt5_009_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_wimbledonpark_012_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141003_berlino_potsdamerplatz_046_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141001_berlino_wallmemorial_012_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141001_berlino_wallmemorial_016_1200x900.jpg
Manuel
Edit: add "Mind The Gap" pic
Thanks for the samples Manuel! Is that a concave or convex version of the 35/2?
navmannz wrote:
Agnostic wrote
Thanks for the info! Will read your link. The far corners are not that important to me, I usually shoot a little wide if possible which leaves me some room to crop extreme corners if sharpness there is critical (which is not that often anyway). I'm more interested in the rendering/color/bokeh.I already have a QBM Distagon 35/2.8, a Minolta MC 35/1.8 and a Schneider Retina Curtagon 35/2.8 but the concave FD 35/2 especially seems to have a big following from what I read online.
The FD 24/2 is another one that's supposed to be very good an I am keeping an eye out for that too. I have an FDn 24/2.8 which I found a bit disappointing especially compared to the FDn 20/2.8 and 28/2 which are both excellent on the a7 (may be just my copy of the 24/2.8 though since most people seem to think the 20/2.8 and 24/2.8 are very close in quality).
Thanks for the samples!
That looks strange indeed, edges look quite a bit more in focus than the center.
As I said before I'm not really bothered all that much by far corner sharpness. What does bother me is the behavior of the FE 28-70 for instance. My copy at least had a very sharp center, then a less sharp donut ring, then an area of greater sharpness again before sharpness falling off in the corners again. I have seen this behavior from a few other lenses too.
ManuelLaMantia wrote:
Agnostic wrote
navmannz wrote
Agnostic wrote
navmannz wrote
Agnostic wrote
Nice pictures! The FE 28 looks good. Still debating if I will get one...I do like the FDn 28/2 a lot though.
John
John
I already have a QBM Distagon 35/2.8, a Minolta MC 35/1.8 and a Schneider Retina Curtagon 35/2.8 but the concave FD 35/2 especially seems to have a big following from what I read online.
The FD 24/2 is another one that's supposed to be very good an I am keeping an eye out for that too. I have an FDn 24/2.8 which I found a bit disappointing especially compared to the FDn 20/2.8 and 28/2 which are both excellent on the a7 (may be just my copy of the 24/2.8 though since most people seem to think the 20/2.8 and 24/2.8 are very close in quality).
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140529_londra_canarywharf_001_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_heathrowt5_006_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_heathrowt5_009_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_wimbledonpark_012_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141003_berlino_potsdamerplatz_046_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141001_berlino_wallmemorial_012_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141001_berlino_wallmemorial_016_1200x900.jpg
Manuel
Edit: add "Mind The Gap" pic
Thanks for the samples Manuel! Is that a concave or convex version of the 35/2?
Jun 05, 2015 at 09:30 AM
p.917 #3Sony FE Images Thread
Michael Everet wrote:
Rene and Bob, not only do these shots make me want to visit Gruyere -- and we just got back from a vacation to Basel and Bern -- but Bob the 3030 brought back memories, as it was my first foray into digital. I remember waiting specifically until the digital cameras got to 3mp, thinking OK, now they are ready for prime time. How things have changed.
Michael
oh Michael. you are in Switzerland ? I'm very close from Bern . if you have time let me know.
René
Jun 05, 2015 at 09:40 AM
p.917 #4Sony FE Images Thread
Another nice round everyone. And thank you Gregg and Philippe!
Fantastic landscape shots Rene!
More shots from the botanical garden with the L50AA, got around to PP these a bit, and I realized my diminished interest in this kind of settings.
Edited on Jun 05, 2015 at 08:43 PM · View previous versions
Fantastic landscape shots Rene!
More shots from the botanical garden with the L50AA, got around to PP these a bit, and I realized my diminished interest in this kind of settings.
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Edited on Jun 05, 2015 at 08:43 PM · View previous versions
Jun 05, 2015 at 10:19 AM
p.917 #5Sony FE Images Thread
The pics and lens options continue to impress!
Bob - I think a CV 15 MkIII is going to be my next purchase - thanks to you! BTW I think your Lovepower Church pic would really look great with some vertical correction applied.
The 28 FE really has me thinking as well - and the 21mm addition is a pleasant surprise. Hope to see more of those pics!
Still grinding through my Patagonia pics - here are 3 more with A7r and 24-70 FE. It was a flat light day - but then you have to go with what you have!
Dave
Bob - I think a CV 15 MkIII is going to be my next purchase - thanks to you! BTW I think your Lovepower Church pic would really look great with some vertical correction applied.
The 28 FE really has me thinking as well - and the 21mm addition is a pleasant surprise. Hope to see more of those pics!
Still grinding through my Patagonia pics - here are 3 more with A7r and 24-70 FE. It was a flat light day - but then you have to go with what you have!
Dave
Jun 05, 2015 at 10:45 AM
p.917 #6Sony FE Images Thread
Dave, I have enjoyed your Patagonia series a lot. most of them are breathtaking. I hope one day I can visit there and wish I can bring half as good images as you posted
Jun 05, 2015 at 10:48 AM
p.917 #7Sony FE Images Thread
dbehrens wrote:
The pics and lens options continue to impress!
Bob - I think a CV 15 MkIII is going to be my next purchase - thanks to you! BTW I think your Lovepower Church pic would really look great with some vertical correction applied.
The 28 FE really has me thinking as well - and the 21mm addition is a pleasant surprise. Hope to see more of those pics!
Thanks on the CV 15 MkIII. I love this lens, especially it's size. I used to shoot the Zeiss Distagon 15 ZE which, although stellar, is so large compared to the CV. Very happy with this lens.
BTW - I can't see your images . . . I think it's the firewall here at the office. Can't wait to see them later.
Here's a little vertical correction on that image:
The pics and lens options continue to impress!
Bob - I think a CV 15 MkIII is going to be my next purchase - thanks to you! BTW I think your Lovepower Church pic would really look great with some vertical correction applied.
The 28 FE really has me thinking as well - and the 21mm addition is a pleasant surprise. Hope to see more of those pics!
Thanks on the CV 15 MkIII. I love this lens, especially it's size. I used to shoot the Zeiss Distagon 15 ZE which, although stellar, is so large compared to the CV. Very happy with this lens.
BTW - I can't see your images . . . I think it's the firewall here at the office. Can't wait to see them later.
Here's a little vertical correction on that image:
 |
||
 |
||
|
Jun 05, 2015 at 10:52 AM
p.917 #8Sony FE Images Thread
Thankyou very much your very valued comments. and a great compliment to you photo artist!
some pictures with the FE28 and FE28 + 21 converter. Today, Lake Murten. The images are artistically without claim. my focal length is not really 21 mm. But the converter remains in my collection. It was so hot (31°). therefore more in the water as the photograph
René
some pictures with the FE28 and FE28 + 21 converter. Today, Lake Murten. The images are artistically without claim. my focal length is not really 21 mm. But the converter remains in my collection. It was so hot (31°). therefore more in the water as the photograph
René
Jun 05, 2015 at 11:04 AM
p.917 #9Sony FE Images Thread
zhangyue wrote:
Dave, I have enjoyed your Patagonia series a lot. most of them are breathtaking. I hope one day I can visit there and wish I can bring half as good images as you posted
1+
Jun 05, 2015 at 11:10 AM
|
p.917 #11Sony FE Images Thread
Thanks guys for the encouraging words. But the reality is that most everyone on this thread can do this - we have the equipment, PP skills and practice - from there its just composition and location. Just drop us into a place like Patagonia and we all will be dazzled!
zhangyue wrote:
Dave, I have enjoyed your Patagonia series a lot. most of them are breathtaking. I hope one day I can visit there and wish I can bring half as good images as you posted
---------------------------------------------
xwing15 wrote:
Thankyou very much your very valued comments. and a great compliment to you photo artist!
some pictures with the FE28 and FE28 + 21 converter. Today, Lake Murten. The images are artistically without claim. my focal length is not really 21 mm. But the converter remains in my collection. It was so hot (31°). therefore more in the water as the photograph
René
I continue to be impressed with this lens combo!
---------------------------------------------
xwing15 wrote:
1+
---------------------------------------------
Ronny _Olsson wrote:
Wow Dave... stunnig shots
rji2goleez wrote:
Bob - I think a CV 15 MkIII is going to be my next purchase - thanks to you! BTW I think your Lovepower Church pic would really look great with some vertical correction applied.
The 28 FE really has me thinking as well - and the 21mm addition is a pleasant surprise. Hope to see more of those pics!Thanks on the CV 15 MkIII. I love this lens, especially it's size. I used to shoot the Zeiss Distagon 15 ZE which, although stellar, is so large compared to the CV. Very happy with this lens.
BTW - I can't see your images . . . I think it's the firewall here at the office. Can't wait to see them later.
Here's a little vertical correction on that image:
Yep - I think vertical correction is a useful tool with UWA.
My pics are hosted at PBase. Some IT Administrators think its a porn site. . . maybe lens porn!
zhangyue wrote:
Dave, I have enjoyed your Patagonia series a lot. most of them are breathtaking. I hope one day I can visit there and wish I can bring half as good images as you posted
---------------------------------------------
xwing15 wrote:
Thankyou very much your very valued comments. and a great compliment to you photo artist!
some pictures with the FE28 and FE28 + 21 converter. Today, Lake Murten. The images are artistically without claim. my focal length is not really 21 mm. But the converter remains in my collection. It was so hot (31°). therefore more in the water as the photograph
René
I continue to be impressed with this lens combo!
---------------------------------------------
xwing15 wrote:
zhangyue wrote
Dave, I have enjoyed your Patagonia series a lot. most of them are breathtaking. I hope one day I can visit there and wish I can bring half as good images as you posted---------------------------------------------
Ronny _Olsson wrote:
Wow Dave... stunnig shots
rji2goleez wrote:
dbehrens wrote
The pics and lens options continue to impress!Bob - I think a CV 15 MkIII is going to be my next purchase - thanks to you! BTW I think your Lovepower Church pic would really look great with some vertical correction applied.
The 28 FE really has me thinking as well - and the 21mm addition is a pleasant surprise. Hope to see more of those pics!
BTW - I can't see your images . . . I think it's the firewall here at the office. Can't wait to see them later.
Here's a little vertical correction on that image:
Yep - I think vertical correction is a useful tool with UWA.
My pics are hosted at PBase. Some IT Administrators think its a porn site. . . maybe lens porn!
Jun 05, 2015 at 12:17 PM
p.917 #12Sony FE Images Thread
Sony A7 + Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Jun 05, 2015 at 02:00 PM
p.917 #14Sony FE Images Thread
Here are some portrait pics on A7R with the ZA135. It's such a fantastic lens. Oh and that last pic is me 
First and fifth photo taken at f5.6, all others are WO at f1.8.
DSC01935 by briantho, on Flickr
DSC01984 by briantho, on Flickr
DSC01964 by briantho, on Flickr
DSC01949 by briantho, on Flickr
DSC01917 by briantho, on Flickr
DSC01911 by briantho, on Flickr
DSC02034 by briantho, on Flickr
Edited on Jun 05, 2015 at 02:54 PM · View previous versions
First and fifth photo taken at f5.6, all others are WO at f1.8.
DSC01935 by briantho, on FlickrDSC01984 by briantho, on FlickrDSC01964 by briantho, on FlickrDSC01949 by briantho, on FlickrDSC01917 by briantho, on FlickrDSC01911 by briantho, on FlickrDSC02034 by briantho, on FlickrEdited on Jun 05, 2015 at 02:54 PM · View previous versions
Jun 05, 2015 at 02:42 PM
p.917 #15Sony FE Images Thread
A7r Mod with the Minolta MD 35-70mm f/3.5 Macro These shots were all taken in Macro mode to demonstrate the rendering style of this lens.
Jun 05, 2015 at 02:54 PM
p.917 #17Sony FE Images Thread
Agnostic wrote:
Many excellent pictures again these last pages everyone! Don't think I have ever put so many likes in one go before.
I already have a QBM Distagon 35/2.8, a Minolta MC 35/1.8 and a Schneider Retina Curtagon 35/2.8 but the concave FD 35/2 especially seems to have a big following from what I read online.
The FD 24/2 is another one that's supposed to be very good an I am keeping an eye out for that too. I have an FDn 24/2.8 which I found a bit disappointing especially compared to the FDn 20/2.8 and 28/2 which are both excellent on the a7 (may be just my copy of the 24/2.8 though since most people seem to think the 20/2.8 and 24/2.8 are very close in quality).This one might give you an idea of the bokeh of the 35 F/2. I was walking back along the beach dicing with the waves that were coming in onto the only hard sand that offered easy walking - I set it on F/2.8 from memory, set the focus at about 3 m, and took a couple to explore the effect. I find it hard to escape the impression that there is something funny going on here with reverse curvature of the field of sharp focus - look at the waves on the far left and the houses top right, both of which seem in sharper focus than the centre distance. 
WRT the 24, both it and the 20 are also tested at the site I put the link in for, and the corners don't come in all that well for either - I have the 20, and I use it only because I don't have an alternative. I'm hopeful that Mr Zeiss will expand the Loxia or Batis lines in that direction. JohnThanks for the samples!
That looks strange indeed, edges look quite a bit more in focus than the center.
As I said before I'm not really bothered all that much by far corner sharpness. What does bother me is the behavior of the FE 28-70 for instance. My copy at least had a very sharp center, then a less sharp donut ring, then an area of greater sharpness again before sharpness falling off in the corners again. I have seen this...Show more →
John
Haven't tried the FD 35/2 yet but I'm keeping an eye out for one. I suppose you are referring to the concave version?I have the so-called new FD 35 F/2, and I find it a fantastic performer - sharp into the corners from about 5.6 and with very little purple fringing. It's very similar overall to the 28 F/2 though I find the far corners on the 28 not quite as good. There's an assessment of the 35 F/2 on an A7R at http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=4364.
JohnThanks for the info! Will read your link. The far corners are not that important to me, I usually shoot a little wide if possible which leaves me some room to crop extreme corners if sharpness there is critical (which is not that often anyway). I'm more interested in the rendering/color/bokeh.
I already have a QBM Distagon 35/2.8, a Minolta MC 35/1.8 and a Schneider Retina Curtagon 35/2.8 but the concave FD 35/2 especially seems to have a big following from what I read online.
The FD 24/2 is another one that's supposed to be very good an I am keeping an eye out for that too. I have an FDn 24/2.8 which I found a bit disappointing especially compared to the FDn 20/2.8 and 28/2 which are both excellent on the a7 (may be just my copy of the 24/2.8 though since most people seem to think the 20/2.8 and 24/2.8 are very close in quality).Some old pics and some re-post about wonderful Canon FDn 35mm f/2... especially for bokeh aspect...
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140529_londra_canarywharf_001_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_heathrowt5_006_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_heathrowt5_009_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_wimbledonpark_012_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141003_berlino_potsdamerplatz_046_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141001_berlino_wallmemorial_012_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141001_berlino_wallmemorial_016_1200x900.jpg
Manuel
Edit: add "Mind The Gap" pic
You're welcome. It is convex version FDn (FD new)... not radioactive
My copy was built in 1980 (Data code = U) but is in a perfect (incredible) condition and the optical performance is impressive... the only flaw is that it suffers a little with flares.
Manuel
Many excellent pictures again these last pages everyone! Don't think I have ever put so many likes in one go before.
navmannz wrote
Agnostic wrote
Thanks for the info! Will read your link. The far corners are not that important to me, I usually shoot a little wide if possible which leaves me some room to crop extreme corners if sharpness there is critical (which is not that often anyway). I'm more interested in the rendering/color/bokeh.I already have a QBM Distagon 35/2.8, a Minolta MC 35/1.8 and a Schneider Retina Curtagon 35/2.8 but the concave FD 35/2 especially seems to have a big following from what I read online.
The FD 24/2 is another one that's supposed to be very good an I am keeping an eye out for that too. I have an FDn 24/2.8 which I found a bit disappointing especially compared to the FDn 20/2.8 and 28/2 which are both excellent on the a7 (may be just my copy of the 24/2.8 though since most people seem to think the 20/2.8 and 24/2.8 are very close in quality).
WRT the 24, both it and the 20 are also tested at the site I put the link in for, and the corners don't come in all that well for either - I have the 20, and I use it only because I don't have an alternative. I'm hopeful that Mr Zeiss will expand the Loxia or Batis lines in that direction. John
That looks strange indeed, edges look quite a bit more in focus than the center.
As I said before I'm not really bothered all that much by far corner sharpness. What does bother me is the behavior of the FE 28-70 for instance. My copy at least had a very sharp center, then a less sharp donut ring, then an area of greater sharpness again before sharpness falling off in the corners again. I have seen this...Show more →
ManuelLaMantia wrote
Agnostic wrote
navmannz wrote
Agnostic wrote
navmannz wrote
I'm with you on that - I think its a under-rated lens - the FD 35 F/2 the same...John
John
I already have a QBM Distagon 35/2.8, a Minolta MC 35/1.8 and a Schneider Retina Curtagon 35/2.8 but the concave FD 35/2 especially seems to have a big following from what I read online.
The FD 24/2 is another one that's supposed to be very good an I am keeping an eye out for that too. I have an FDn 24/2.8 which I found a bit disappointing especially compared to the FDn 20/2.8 and 28/2 which are both excellent on the a7 (may be just my copy of the 24/2.8 though since most people seem to think the 20/2.8 and 24/2.8 are very close in quality).
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140529_londra_canarywharf_001_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_heathrowt5_006_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_heathrowt5_009_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/20140601_londra_wimbledonpark_012_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141003_berlino_potsdamerplatz_046_1200x900.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141001_berlino_wallmemorial_012_654x1080.jpg
http://particolarivisioni.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141001_berlino_wallmemorial_016_1200x900.jpg
Manuel
Edit: add "Mind The Gap" pic
You're welcome. It is convex version FDn (FD new)... not radioactive
My copy was built in 1980 (Data code = U) but is in a perfect (incredible) condition and the optical performance is impressive... the only flaw is that it suffers a little with flares.
Manuel
Jun 05, 2015 at 03:33 PM
p.917 #18Sony FE Images Thread
ebookman wrote:
A7r Mod with the Minolta MD 35-70mm f/3.5 Macro These shots were all taken in Macro mode to demonstrate the rendering style of this lens.
http://jendale.smugmug.com/Dales-pictures/Dales-2015-photos/i-NKqNGKN/0/O/DSC09889---Copy.jpg
http://jendale.smugmug.com/Dales-pictures/Dales-2015-photos/i-GMv85CX/0/O/DSC09896---Copy.jpg
http://jendale.smugmug.com/Dales-pictures/Dales-2015-photos/i-4tLVhJJ/0/O/DSC09897---Copy.jpg
http://jendale.smugmug.com/Dales-pictures/Dales-2015-photos/i-TvCQvfq/0/O/DSC09894---Copy.jpg
http://jendale.smugmug.com/Dales-pictures/Dales-2015-photos/i-5kGDMKD/0/O/DSC09885---Copy.jpg
Dale, you made me discover a real gem... one of the best buys of 2014... thanks again!
Manuel
A7r Mod with the Minolta MD 35-70mm f/3.5 Macro These shots were all taken in Macro mode to demonstrate the rendering style of this lens.
http://jendale.smugmug.com/Dales-pictures/Dales-2015-photos/i-NKqNGKN/0/O/DSC09889---Copy.jpg
http://jendale.smugmug.com/Dales-pictures/Dales-2015-photos/i-GMv85CX/0/O/DSC09896---Copy.jpg
http://jendale.smugmug.com/Dales-pictures/Dales-2015-photos/i-4tLVhJJ/0/O/DSC09897---Copy.jpg
http://jendale.smugmug.com/Dales-pictures/Dales-2015-photos/i-TvCQvfq/0/O/DSC09894---Copy.jpg
http://jendale.smugmug.com/Dales-pictures/Dales-2015-photos/i-5kGDMKD/0/O/DSC09885---Copy.jpg
Dale, you made me discover a real gem... one of the best buys of 2014... thanks again!
Manuel
Jun 05, 2015 at 03:37 PM
p.917 #19Sony FE Images Thread
Two more quick shots...
Gregg
1st: Summilux 50 E46 pre with VM-E close focus @f1.4
2nd: FE 28 @f2
Gregg
1st: Summilux 50 E46 pre with VM-E close focus @f1.4
2nd: FE 28 @f2
Jun 05, 2015 at 04:26 PM
p.917 #20Sony FE Images Thread
While processing images from my most recent outing, I found this rather low key botanical portrait taken last summer in Olympic Nat'l Park.
A7 & CV 125
Stachys cooleyae
Edited on Jun 05, 2015 at 05:24 PM · View previous versions
A7 & CV 125
Stachys cooleyae
Edited on Jun 05, 2015 at 05:24 PM · View previous versions
Jun 05, 2015 at 04:38 PM