Still trying to decide what lenses to keep of the 90, 125 and 180..
Unfortunately i haven't had time to shoot much so the decision is delayed :-)
Today i'm leaning towards putting the 180mm APO up for sale, since it's just a focal length i will not use much, and it's to good to just be left at home..
Thanks John, I normally shoot this spot with the Zeiss 21 ZE a little closer to the water. But with the flow being a little low, it seemed like shooting the 28 from a little further back made more sense.
-Tim
navmannz wrote:
Number one in particular is beautifully executed, Tim!
Thanks, believe it or not all but one is at f/11. The vertical shot may have been at f/16, or the half stop between f/11 and f/16. The Pentax shows some bizarre depth of field for the focal length.
Thanks for the compliments, you're doing pretty darn well yourself with the 15. I love my ZE 15, but it is BIG...I wish it was a little smaller.
Tim
hiepphotog wrote:
Wow impressive the past few pages everyone.
Dave: That pano shot is breath-taking!
Tim: Your waterfall series is always excellent, regardless of the lens you are using. So much depth. Were you shooting these at f/16 or f/22?
I am constantly blown away by the quality of pictures on this thread. There are so many excellent ones, and it has been so enriching I feel compelled to contribute some modest efforts. Thank you everyone for making this thread what it is.
Charlie - lot's of CA in some of those pics. I don't recall the 50cron being that bad on the M240 but perhaps the Sony shows it more? Cool cars though!
