Sony FE Images Thread
p.2346 #3Sony FE Images Thread
documenta14: parthenon, night sky and laser by rol-and
Loxia 21mm
Aug 05, 2017 at 07:17 AM
p.2346 #4Sony FE Images Thread
Pictures from yesterday. I drove up to Leadville Colorado to do some fishing and finished up the day with a lightning storm at the house. All with A7 and 16-35 f4.
Mike
Mike
Aug 05, 2017 at 07:29 AM
p.2346 #5Sony FE Images Thread
Sony Distagon T* 1.4/35 FE is really nice on my favourite "scene type"; multilayered forest, backlight, polarizer, shoot from tripod with all the time in the world (=time to wait the best light when cloud edge is just passing the sun). Even this is "Zony", it's rendering style is very nice (I never liked rendering style of other Zony's I have/had: FE55 & FE2.8/35). I still don't understand how they have made lens, which is actually usable wide open - I tried most of the scenes also with f/1.7 and f/2.2, but 99% of time I prefer the wide open version. So now there are too lenses I don't hesitate to shoot wide open (other is Carl Zeiss C/Y-series Sonnar T* 3.5/100).
Sony Distagon T* 1.4/35 FE @ f/1.4, 1/250s, A7R @ ISO 100, Hoya HD CIR-PL 72mm
Sony Distagon T* 1.4/35 FE @ f/1.4, 1/250s, A7R @ ISO 100, Hoya HD CIR-PL 72mm
Can't complain performance in side-light scene either.
Sony Distagon T* 1.4/35 FE @ f/2.2, 1/125s, A7R @ ISO 100, Hoya HD CIR-PL 72mm - boke on this scene was best @ f/1.4, but subject is too close to have enough DOF @ f/1.4, actually f/4 needed to capture whole subject into DOF.
Sony Distagon T* 1.4/35 FE @ f/1.4, 1/125s, A7R @ ISO 100, Hoya HD CIR-PL 72mm
Samuli
Sony Distagon T* 1.4/35 FE @ f/1.4, 1/250s, A7R @ ISO 100, Hoya HD CIR-PL 72mm
Sony Distagon T* 1.4/35 FE @ f/1.4, 1/250s, A7R @ ISO 100, Hoya HD CIR-PL 72mm
Can't complain performance in side-light scene either.
Sony Distagon T* 1.4/35 FE @ f/2.2, 1/125s, A7R @ ISO 100, Hoya HD CIR-PL 72mm - boke on this scene was best @ f/1.4, but subject is too close to have enough DOF @ f/1.4, actually f/4 needed to capture whole subject into DOF.
Sony Distagon T* 1.4/35 FE @ f/1.4, 1/125s, A7R @ ISO 100, Hoya HD CIR-PL 72mm
Samuli
Aug 05, 2017 at 08:39 AM
p.2346 #6Sony FE Images Thread
Samuli, I have the highest respect for your remarkable technical knowledge and ability, far in excess of mine, so this sharply limits the importance of what am I about to write: I find this set with the Zony uncomfortable, with the foreground subject almost etched and pasted onto the picture. Could it be oversharpening, because that is the closest I can come to explaining what I mean?
Aug 05, 2017 at 08:45 AM
p.2346 #7Sony FE Images Thread
Werner_Utsch wrote:
" Stairway... "
A7RII, FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM
Fantastic Joshua !!!
Cheers
Werner
These are great Henry !
Thank you very much, Werner! And you just posted another stellar image; the pano image from Tuscany is jaw dropping
!
Henry Lydecker wrote:
Great owls Joshua! I used to live in the central valley for a bit and it is always nice to see those birds.
Here are several scenes from Hong Kong. A flat black Rolls-Royce, a man in a suit having a smoke, and two construction workers in bamboo scaffolds.
Thank you very much for your kind words, Henry! I didn't know that you used to live in the Central Valley. The images from Hong Kong here and in your previous post are excellent and I enjoy them very much.
philber wrote:
René, superb image from Chasseral!!! Bob, brilliant,!!! Dave, inspiring!!! Werner, awesome!!! Joshua, someone commented that you can do it all. Where are your frogs, your snails, your damsels and your running dog
Early morning shoot, Otus 28.
Philippe, sorry to disappoint you but my name is not Ronny.....
. I enjoy your lovely fountain image!
____________________________
One summer evening with Lilly
Sigma 135mm Art in action
Edited on Aug 05, 2017 at 09:32 AM · View previous versions
A7RII, FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM
Fantastic Joshua !!!
Cheers
Werner
These are great Henry !
Thank you very much, Werner! And you just posted another stellar image; the pano image from Tuscany is jaw dropping
!Henry Lydecker wrote:
Great owls Joshua! I used to live in the central valley for a bit and it is always nice to see those birds.
Here are several scenes from Hong Kong. A flat black Rolls-Royce, a man in a suit having a smoke, and two construction workers in bamboo scaffolds.
Thank you very much for your kind words, Henry! I didn't know that you used to live in the Central Valley. The images from Hong Kong here and in your previous post are excellent and I enjoy them very much.
philber wrote:
René, superb image from Chasseral!!! Bob, brilliant,!!! Dave, inspiring!!! Werner, awesome!!! Joshua, someone commented that you can do it all. Where are your frogs, your snails, your damsels and your running dog
Early morning shoot, Otus 28.
Philippe, sorry to disappoint you but my name is not Ronny.....
. I enjoy your lovely fountain image!____________________________
One summer evening with Lilly
 |
||
 © AGeoJO 2017 |
||
 |
Sigma 135mm Art in action
Edited on Aug 05, 2017 at 09:32 AM · View previous versions
Aug 05, 2017 at 09:09 AM
p.2346 #8Sony FE Images Thread
Joshua...love the owls! That last is pretty awesome!
Werner...your architectural skills are superb! Love the BW's. But...your latest pano up top in color, blows me away. Pretty sure my favorite of your valley/rolling hills grabs.
Bob...liking that 100-400??😂 Looks like a really nice lens. Let's see if Joshua pulls the trigger this week!
Ben...love he Loxia grabs. I do miss my Loxia 50!
Dave...really nice! Great colors.
Nadim...also really nice.
Samuli...I love the FE 35 1.4 rendering. I've so far been able to not jump on one because I have the FE 50 1.4(which I would love to hear your thoughts on!!)...but I've rented one for this week and I'm excited.
Went to the beach here in Santa Cruz....trying to not post more Kauai grabs...
Gregg
A7rll and Contax 28 2.8
This 28 I think is the sharpest/most pop of any 28 I've used in the past. As in the hoop grabs input up earlier, the 3Dish is right in your face.
If you look closely, there are two fingers of the rocks!
Edited on Aug 05, 2017 at 09:50 AM · View previous versions
Werner...your architectural skills are superb! Love the BW's. But...your latest pano up top in color, blows me away. Pretty sure my favorite of your valley/rolling hills grabs.
Bob...liking that 100-400??😂 Looks like a really nice lens. Let's see if Joshua pulls the trigger this week!
Ben...love he Loxia grabs. I do miss my Loxia 50!
Dave...really nice! Great colors.
Nadim...also really nice.
Samuli...I love the FE 35 1.4 rendering. I've so far been able to not jump on one because I have the FE 50 1.4(which I would love to hear your thoughts on!!)...but I've rented one for this week and I'm excited.
Went to the beach here in Santa Cruz....trying to not post more Kauai grabs...
Gregg
A7rll and Contax 28 2.8
This 28 I think is the sharpest/most pop of any 28 I've used in the past. As in the hoop grabs input up earlier, the 3Dish is right in your face.
If you look closely, there are two fingers of the rocks!
Edited on Aug 05, 2017 at 09:50 AM · View previous versions
Aug 05, 2017 at 09:12 AM
p.2346 #9Sony FE Images Thread
Sebboh, love that baby pic. So soft and warm.
Rob
Rob
Aug 05, 2017 at 09:20 AM
p.2346 #10Sony FE Images Thread
Philipe -- Interesting the different priorities we all have on rendering! 
I'm with Samuli here, looking for a good combination crisp subject isolation and soft background to emphasize contrast and texture. The problem is finding the perfect lens that retains contrast and definition wide open with a non-telephoto AOV. Samuli is confirming what I learned from Joshua and others that this Zony 35/1.4 is exceptional wide open and just wide enough to capture the surrounding context of the image area.
Not criticizing your POV, just pointing out how we all strive in different ways. There are lots of great approaches for capturing our impression of a scene.
Just another tool in the photo bag of tricks!
philber wrote:
Samuli, I have the highest respect for your remarkable technical knowledge and ability, far in excess of mine, so this sharply limits the importance of what am I about to write: I find this set with the Zony uncomfortable, with the foreground subject almost etched and pasted onto the picture. Could it be oversharpening, because that is the closest I can come to explaining what I mean?
I'm with Samuli here, looking for a good combination crisp subject isolation and soft background to emphasize contrast and texture. The problem is finding the perfect lens that retains contrast and definition wide open with a non-telephoto AOV. Samuli is confirming what I learned from Joshua and others that this Zony 35/1.4 is exceptional wide open and just wide enough to capture the surrounding context of the image area.
Not criticizing your POV, just pointing out how we all strive in different ways. There are lots of great approaches for capturing our impression of a scene.
Just another tool in the photo bag of tricks!
philber wrote:
Samuli, I have the highest respect for your remarkable technical knowledge and ability, far in excess of mine, so this sharply limits the importance of what am I about to write: I find this set with the Zony uncomfortable, with the foreground subject almost etched and pasted onto the picture. Could it be oversharpening, because that is the closest I can come to explaining what I mean?
Aug 05, 2017 at 09:20 AM
|
p.2346 #11Sony FE Images Thread
Henri Capelle: Memorial American War Cemetery by P Z, on FlickrPlaying/testing my just acquired Samyang 35mm 2.8.
Here at f2.8 iso100 1/3200th.
Edited in C1 to my liking sharpness amount 175 on a 1.5 radius. Some highlight repressing done.
Just for yourself visiting Flickr and look magnified.
I have a bit of mixed feelings with this lens so far, It is quite affordable here in the Netherlands at 319 euros and 5 year warranty. So it doesn't have to do wonders.
Using on an A7R.
Will be adding in next days.
p.s.
Shot is taken at an American Memorial War Cemetery in Henri Chapelle, Belgium. A very peaceful place in a beautiful landscape.
Edited on Aug 05, 2017 at 01:57 PM · View previous versions
Aug 05, 2017 at 09:49 AM
p.2346 #12Sony FE Images Thread
Inside the hungarian parliament building Sony a7II +
Fotodiox + Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 @22mm/4.5
Edited on Aug 05, 2017 at 10:08 AM · View previous versions
Fotodiox + Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 @22mm/4.5
 |
||
 |
||
|
Edited on Aug 05, 2017 at 10:08 AM · View previous versions
Aug 05, 2017 at 10:01 AM
p.2346 #13Sony FE Images Thread
Peter in C1 just try this and see if you like this setting on sharpness. Go 280/.6/.6 and halo at 2
Please love to see more from that lens. I'm thinking of grabbing one for travel. Like that shot too and the bokeh on it
Peter Zeedijk wrote:
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4398/35578797093_e1da8cf1a0_h.jpgHenri Capelle: Memorial American War Cemetery by P Z, on Flickr
Playing/testing my just acquired Samyang 35mm 2.8.
Here at f2.8 iso100 1/3200th.
Edited in C1 to my liking sharpness amount 175 on a 1.5 radius. Some highlight repressing done.
Just for yourself visiting Flickr and look magnified.
I have a bit of mixed feelings with this lens so far, It is quite affordable her in the Netherlands at 319 euros and 5 year warranty. So it doesn't have to do wonders.
Will be adding in next days.
p.s.
Shot is taken at an American Memorial War Cemetery in Henri Chapelle, Belgium. I very peaceful place...Show more →
Please love to see more from that lens. I'm thinking of grabbing one for travel. Like that shot too and the bokeh on it
Peter Zeedijk wrote:
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4398/35578797093_e1da8cf1a0_h.jpgHenri Capelle: Memorial American War Cemetery by P Z, on Flickr
Playing/testing my just acquired Samyang 35mm 2.8.
Here at f2.8 iso100 1/3200th.
Edited in C1 to my liking sharpness amount 175 on a 1.5 radius. Some highlight repressing done.
Just for yourself visiting Flickr and look magnified.
I have a bit of mixed feelings with this lens so far, It is quite affordable her in the Netherlands at 319 euros and 5 year warranty. So it doesn't have to do wonders.
Will be adding in next days.
p.s.
Shot is taken at an American Memorial War Cemetery in Henri Chapelle, Belgium. I very peaceful place...Show more →
Aug 05, 2017 at 10:05 AM
p.2346 #14Sony FE Images Thread
Written it down, thanks will try! Thanks for the reply
Aug 05, 2017 at 10:08 AM
p.2346 #16Sony FE Images Thread
philber wrote:
Samuli, I have the highest respect for your remarkable technical knowledge and ability, far in excess of mine,
Philippe, I know you try to be polite, but this is bullsh#t I have no special technical knowledge... just trying to write my observations [crappily on 2nd language...]
philber wrote:
so this sharply limits the importance of what am I about to write: I find this set with the Zony uncomfortable, with the foreground subject almost etched and pasted onto the picture. Could it be oversharpening, because that is the closest I can come to explaining what I mean?
I think I understand what you mean. What I have seen this far of FE1.4/35 I would say that it looks less "organic" (best word I can come up with) than older Zeiss lenses, which maybe correlates to your observation. I have never had older Zeiss (or any brand) lens, which is able to produce usable photos @ f/1.4, so I'm not sure how f/1.4 photos are supposed to look like, DOF is really small @ f/1.4 - I'm much more familiar how high performance Zeiss/Leica photos look like @f/2.8-4. In perfect world I would like to combine ZM 2/35 focus plane and DOF/boke transtion to FE 1.4/35 boke, that would be pretty close to my optimal 35mm lens rendering style. I doubt such lens exists, haven't tried yet the ZM 1.4/35 or new optic formula Milvus 1.4/35 - and I don't feel huge urge to try either of them. More or less everything else I have tried. One day I try Voigtländer 35mm f/1.7, Helena's photos above just reminded me about it - again, but Voigtländer doesn't have "Zeiss like" rendering, very nice rendering but very different.
"subject almost etched and pasted onto the picture" - for me this is fine as rendering style (may not suit all scenes), as long as subject doesn't look like cardboard presentation of subject (=flat), but looks like the actual 3D-object. I have (and have had) lenses which did draw flat cardboard subjects on top of boke, but they are all longer focal lengths e.g. Canon 85LmkII, 135L, 180L(makro), 200/2.8L, Leica M-APO90/2 (not always, few times I have got non-flat results as well), Leica R-APO180/2.8. I do not like "pasting flat cardboard presentations of subject on top of boke"-look, the subject must be non-flat looking in my opinion. Subjects with semitransparent edges on backlit scenes (like the tree on this photo) can look pretty weird, and careful shading of lens from sun and polarizator use do make effect, which look little bit "etched and pasted on picture", but that is intentional and I prefer the effect.
My post processing is Bridge/ACR (color profile, wb, blackpoint, shadows&highlights) -> PhotoShop (Save as TIFF[why in earth Bridge/ACR can't do this directly]) -> move TIFF-image to Linux storage/processing server and use bash-script for the rest: ImageMagick local contrast, resize with Lanczos2 algorhitm, USM 0.3px&100%(similar to PhotoShop 0.2px&75% when Gamma ~ 2.2) -> Guetzli for packing JPG (Guetzli is google's new algorhitm which reduces JPG size 20-40% and at same time reduces JPG packing errors, e.g. gradients are better - "price" is that it takes 2 minutes to compress websize 1280px wide image with 4.2GHz i7, and you need to compile Guetzli yourself as it's only available as source code in GitHub) -> upload to internet server -> start import to database script in internet server.
I have never touched the sharpening settings on ACR, don't even know where they are hidden in the awful, frustrating and endless jungle of sliders (I hate sliders). And I have become lazy and all photos I have posted during last year (or more) I have not adjusted the resizing script parameters. Earlier I was less lazy and I adjusted the local contrast parameters for some photos, but I don't remember ever touching the end-sharpening. In JPG-filename end I have string like ".20_0.15_Lanczos2_1280_0.3_1.0", that is actually the local contrast and sharpening settings used in script, and the re-sampling algorhitm for resizing. I don't have other modern high performance lenses, the default parameters my Linux script uses are "Samuli's best practice based on years of photos from C/Y, G, ZE, ZM series lenses." - maybe parameters need adjustment for modern überlenses. Another possible source for discrepancy is that these are shoot with A7r, it's my least used A7-body, as it's with standard thick sensor glass - only <5% of images have been shoot with this A7-body, I have preferred the A7(Kolari modified thin filter glass) and A7mkII bodies => script might not be optimized for A7r. ZM25 photos have been OK, and I think all of them have been shoot with A7r as well - thou they don't have much boke.
Philippe, thanks for comment - I can't wait your commends for next set of images I'm preparing (front boke images ), if this was distracting I'll advice to skip breakfast tomorrow
One thing starts to look more and more sure; FE1.4/35 may not pair that well with GM85 as I hoped for. It has more contrast and microcontrast than GM85. I purchased the FE1.4/35 to get lens, which "pairs nicely" with GM85. Maybe I'll just have to give up and change GM85 to Loxia (if I can find one from store who takes GM85 in exchange), and get back to my comfort zone of traditional Zeiss rendering... But like Helena I think I also want/need something little different, so I don't give up yet, I'll try to get this working.
Greggf wrote:
Samuli...I love the FE 35 1.4 rendering. I've so far been able to not jump on one because I have the FE 50 1.4(which I would love to hear your thoughts on!!)...but I've rented one for this week and I'm excited.
Gregg, I have been drooling after FE1.4/50 due to your photos and other photographer, who's name doesn't come out just now (this photographer shoots American custom cars with FE1.4/50 and GM85, sorry about crappy name memory!!!). On some photos I have seen hint of issue due to having larger DOF in corners due to mechanical vignetting, not 100% sure is that real issue, or is it just the scenes. I would really need to shoot it myself to be sure - all f/1.4 lenses suffer from this, but on some photos it has been really distracting.
"FE1.4/50 is so big => I don't want it" has been my main excuse, and maybe little also Zony quality control (no idea is 50mm as bad as 35mm) and no real manual focusing, but instead focusing via AF and non-connected ring. Now finding that I actually like to shoot with FE1.4/35 and GM85 even they are very large and heavy lenses (manual focusing I don't like so much...but size/weight is fine), I need to find new excuse(s)... or real reason like "empty wallet", will do as well for now.
Samuli
EDIT: Edited 3rd paragraph (the one with starts with quotation mark)
Edited on Aug 05, 2017 at 10:54 AM · View previous versions
Samuli, I have the highest respect for your remarkable technical knowledge and ability, far in excess of mine,
Philippe, I know you try to be polite, but this is bullsh#t
I have no special technical knowledge... just trying to write my observations [crappily on 2nd language...]philber wrote:
so this sharply limits the importance of what am I about to write: I find this set with the Zony uncomfortable, with the foreground subject almost etched and pasted onto the picture. Could it be oversharpening, because that is the closest I can come to explaining what I mean?
I think I understand what you mean. What I have seen this far of FE1.4/35 I would say that it looks less "organic" (best word I can come up with) than older Zeiss lenses, which maybe correlates to your observation. I have never had older Zeiss (or any brand) lens, which is able to produce usable photos @ f/1.4, so I'm not sure how f/1.4 photos are supposed to look like, DOF is really small @ f/1.4 - I'm much more familiar how high performance Zeiss/Leica photos look like @f/2.8-4. In perfect world I would like to combine ZM 2/35 focus plane and DOF/boke transtion to FE 1.4/35 boke, that would be pretty close to my optimal 35mm lens rendering style. I doubt such lens exists, haven't tried yet the ZM 1.4/35 or new optic formula Milvus 1.4/35 - and I don't feel huge urge to try either of them. More or less everything else I have tried. One day I try Voigtländer 35mm f/1.7, Helena's photos above just reminded me about it - again, but Voigtländer doesn't have "Zeiss like" rendering, very nice rendering but very different.
"subject almost etched and pasted onto the picture" - for me this is fine as rendering style (may not suit all scenes), as long as subject doesn't look like cardboard presentation of subject (=flat), but looks like the actual 3D-object. I have (and have had) lenses which did draw flat cardboard subjects on top of boke, but they are all longer focal lengths e.g. Canon 85LmkII, 135L, 180L(makro), 200/2.8L, Leica M-APO90/2 (not always, few times I have got non-flat results as well), Leica R-APO180/2.8. I do not like "pasting flat cardboard presentations of subject on top of boke"-look, the subject must be non-flat looking in my opinion. Subjects with semitransparent edges on backlit scenes (like the tree on this photo) can look pretty weird, and careful shading of lens from sun and polarizator use do make effect, which look little bit "etched and pasted on picture", but that is intentional and I prefer the effect.
My post processing is Bridge/ACR (color profile, wb, blackpoint, shadows&highlights) -> PhotoShop (Save as TIFF[why in earth Bridge/ACR can't do this directly]) -> move TIFF-image to Linux storage/processing server and use bash-script for the rest: ImageMagick local contrast, resize with Lanczos2 algorhitm, USM 0.3px&100%(similar to PhotoShop 0.2px&75% when Gamma ~ 2.2) -> Guetzli for packing JPG (Guetzli is google's new algorhitm which reduces JPG size 20-40% and at same time reduces JPG packing errors, e.g. gradients are better - "price" is that it takes 2 minutes to compress websize 1280px wide image with 4.2GHz i7, and you need to compile Guetzli yourself as it's only available as source code in GitHub) -> upload to internet server -> start import to database script in internet server.
I have never touched the sharpening settings on ACR, don't even know where they are hidden in the awful, frustrating and endless jungle of sliders (I hate sliders). And I have become lazy and all photos I have posted during last year (or more) I have not adjusted the resizing script parameters. Earlier I was less lazy and I adjusted the local contrast parameters for some photos, but I don't remember ever touching the end-sharpening. In JPG-filename end I have string like ".20_0.15_Lanczos2_1280_0.3_1.0", that is actually the local contrast and sharpening settings used in script, and the re-sampling algorhitm for resizing. I don't have other modern high performance lenses, the default parameters my Linux script uses are "Samuli's best practice based on years of photos from C/Y, G, ZE, ZM series lenses." - maybe parameters need adjustment for modern überlenses. Another possible source for discrepancy is that these are shoot with A7r, it's my least used A7-body, as it's with standard thick sensor glass - only <5% of images have been shoot with this A7-body, I have preferred the A7(Kolari modified thin filter glass) and A7mkII bodies => script might not be optimized for A7r. ZM25 photos have been OK, and I think all of them have been shoot with A7r as well - thou they don't have much boke.
Philippe, thanks for comment - I can't wait your commends for next set of images I'm preparing (front boke images
), if this was distracting I'll advice to skip breakfast tomorrow One thing starts to look more and more sure; FE1.4/35 may not pair that well with GM85 as I hoped for. It has more contrast and microcontrast than GM85. I purchased the FE1.4/35 to get lens, which "pairs nicely" with GM85. Maybe I'll just have to give up and change GM85 to Loxia (if I can find one from store who takes GM85 in exchange), and get back to my comfort zone of traditional Zeiss rendering... But like Helena I think I also want/need something little different, so I don't give up yet, I'll try to get this working.
Greggf wrote:
Samuli...I love the FE 35 1.4 rendering. I've so far been able to not jump on one because I have the FE 50 1.4(which I would love to hear your thoughts on!!)...but I've rented one for this week and I'm excited.
Gregg, I have been drooling after FE1.4/50 due to your photos and other photographer, who's name doesn't come out just now (this photographer shoots American custom cars with FE1.4/50 and GM85, sorry about crappy name memory!!!). On some photos I have seen hint of issue due to having larger DOF in corners due to mechanical vignetting, not 100% sure is that real issue, or is it just the scenes. I would really need to shoot it myself to be sure - all f/1.4 lenses suffer from this, but on some photos it has been really distracting.
"FE1.4/50 is so big => I don't want it" has been my main excuse, and maybe little also Zony quality control (no idea is 50mm as bad as 35mm) and no real manual focusing, but instead focusing via AF and non-connected ring. Now finding that I actually like to shoot with FE1.4/35 and GM85 even they are very large and heavy lenses (manual focusing I don't like so much...but size/weight is fine), I need to find new excuse(s)... or real reason like "empty wallet", will do as well for now.
Samuli
EDIT: Edited 3rd paragraph (the one with starts with quotation mark)
Edited on Aug 05, 2017 at 10:54 AM · View previous versions
Aug 05, 2017 at 10:39 AM
p.2346 #17Sony FE Images Thread
Likewise Rene!
xwing15 wrote:
stunning Werner...
xwing15 wrote:
stunning Werner...
Aug 05, 2017 at 10:48 AM
p.2346 #18Sony FE Images Thread
Greggf wrote:
Joshua...love the owls! That last is pretty awesome!
Werner...your architectural skills are superb! Love the BW's. But...your latest pano up top in color, blows me away. Pretty sure my favorite of your valley/rolling hills grabs.
Bob...liking that 100-400??😂 Looks like a really nice lens. Let's see if Joshua pulls the trigger this week!
Ben...love he Loxia grabs. I do miss my Loxia 50!
Dave...really nice! Great colors.
Nadim...also really nice.
Samuli...I love the FE 35 1.4 rendering. I've so far been able to not jump on one because I have the FE 50 1.4(which I would love to hear your thoughts on!!)...but I've rented...Show more →
Thank you, Gregg! Your beach images, regardless of the location, are wonderful!
_____________________________________
Another image using the Sigma 135mm Art lens
Anastasia
Joshua...love the owls! That last is pretty awesome!
Werner...your architectural skills are superb! Love the BW's. But...your latest pano up top in color, blows me away. Pretty sure my favorite of your valley/rolling hills grabs.
Bob...liking that 100-400??😂 Looks like a really nice lens. Let's see if Joshua pulls the trigger this week!
Ben...love he Loxia grabs. I do miss my Loxia 50!
Dave...really nice! Great colors.
Nadim...also really nice.
Samuli...I love the FE 35 1.4 rendering. I've so far been able to not jump on one because I have the FE 50 1.4(which I would love to hear your thoughts on!!)...but I've rented...Show more →
Thank you, Gregg! Your beach images, regardless of the location, are wonderful!
_____________________________________
Another image using the Sigma 135mm Art lens
|
||
 © AGeoJO 2017 |
||
|
Anastasia
Aug 05, 2017 at 11:07 AM
p.2346 #19Sony FE Images Thread
!6-35GM
Shadow and Fan by Viramati, on Flickr
Shadow and Fan by Viramati, on Flickr
Aug 05, 2017 at 11:30 AM
p.2346 #20Sony FE Images Thread
@Mathieu thank you my very creative friend
Here is another experiment with fireworks. Is the first time I try this. Is really not easy.
advices. always welcome
nice weekend at all
René
Here is another experiment with fireworks. Is the first time I try this. Is really not easy.
advices. always welcome
nice weekend at all
René
Aug 05, 2017 at 12:27 PM