Sony FE Images Thread
p.1324 #1Sony FE Images Thread
Ronny, why don't you compare the AF of your camera with his using the same lens. So, do the comparison under the same conditions and using the same "target". Since we are talking about native lenses here, I am sure yours will be able to AF OK. And if you guys find out that his is doing worse than yours, then you know for sure that there is something wrong with his. I assume that you guys are local from each other in this case.
Dec 18, 2015 at 11:33 AM
p.1324 #2Sony FE Images Thread
AGeoJO wrote:
Ronny, why don't you compare the AF of your camera with his using the same lens. So, do the comparison under the same conditions and using the same "target". Since we are talking about native lenses here, I am sure yours will be able to AF OK. And if you guys find out that his is doing worse than yours, then you know for sure that there is something wrong with his. I assume that you guys are local from each other in this case.
The problem is he lives 40 mil from me ... at least a 4 hour drive
Very nice Werner
Edited on Dec 18, 2015 at 12:05 PM · View previous versions
Ronny, why don't you compare the AF of your camera with his using the same lens. So, do the comparison under the same conditions and using the same "target". Since we are talking about native lenses here, I am sure yours will be able to AF OK. And if you guys find out that his is doing worse than yours, then you know for sure that there is something wrong with his. I assume that you guys are local from each other in this case.
The problem is he lives 40 mil from me ... at least a 4 hour drive
Very nice Werner
Edited on Dec 18, 2015 at 12:05 PM · View previous versions
Dec 18, 2015 at 11:37 AM
p.1324 #3Sony FE Images Thread
AGeoJO wrote:
Ronny, why don't you compare the AF of your camera with his using the same lens. So, do the comparison under the same conditions and using the same "target". Since we are talking about native lenses here, I am sure yours will be able to AF OK. And if you guys find out that his is doing worse than yours, then you know for sure that there is something wrong with his. I assume that you guys are local from each other in this case.
If you are both using the same lens and camera, you may also want to swap lenses between you to run some further testing to see if you are getting the same or almost the same results as for the first comparison.
Rich
Ronny, why don't you compare the AF of your camera with his using the same lens. So, do the comparison under the same conditions and using the same "target". Since we are talking about native lenses here, I am sure yours will be able to AF OK. And if you guys find out that his is doing worse than yours, then you know for sure that there is something wrong with his. I assume that you guys are local from each other in this case.
If you are both using the same lens and camera, you may also want to swap lenses between you to run some further testing to see if you are getting the same or almost the same results as for the first comparison.
Rich
Dec 18, 2015 at 11:38 AM
p.1324 #4Sony FE Images Thread
Inspiring pictures in the last several pages!
[url=https://flic.kr/p/BZ5Afp]
DSC02728 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url]
[url=https://flic.kr/p/BzLtzc]
DSC02738 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url]
[url=https://flic.kr/p/BZ5Afp]
DSC02728 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url][url=https://flic.kr/p/BzLtzc]
DSC02738 by Douglas Liu, on Flickr[/url]Dec 18, 2015 at 11:45 AM
p.1324 #5Sony FE Images Thread
Crohy Tower, Maghery, Ct. Donegal, Ireland
A7 / Minolta MD Zoom 35-70mm 3.5
A7 / Minolta MD Zoom 35-70mm 3.5
Dec 18, 2015 at 12:04 PM
p.1324 #7Sony FE Images Thread
Two pictures taken with the C/Y Sonnar 100mm f/3.5 and the A7R:
Autostadt Bridge with Santa by Jannik Peters, auf Flickr
Volkswagen Power Plant by Jannik Peters, auf Flickr
Autostadt Bridge with Santa by Jannik Peters, auf Flickr
Volkswagen Power Plant by Jannik Peters, auf Flickr
Dec 18, 2015 at 12:13 PM
p.1324 #9Sony FE Images Thread
Ronny _Olsson wrote:
Very nice Douglas !
Thank you Ronny! Both were shot with the A7II and the Canon 24-70 f2.8 L II.
Douglas
Very nice Douglas !
Thank you Ronny! Both were shot with the A7II and the Canon 24-70 f2.8 L II.
Douglas
Dec 18, 2015 at 12:46 PM
p.1324 #10Sony FE Images Thread
Love these images!
HelenaN wrote:
A7 and CV 50/1.5:
http://www.helenasphotography.com/keep/2015/20151217_002_a7-cv50b.jpg
http://www.helenasphotography.com/keep/2015/20151217_001_a7-cv50b.jpg
http://www.helenasphotography.com/keep/2015/20151217_004_a7-cv50b.jpg
HelenaN wrote:
A7 and CV 50/1.5:
http://www.helenasphotography.com/keep/2015/20151217_002_a7-cv50b.jpg
http://www.helenasphotography.com/keep/2015/20151217_001_a7-cv50b.jpg
http://www.helenasphotography.com/keep/2015/20151217_004_a7-cv50b.jpg
Dec 18, 2015 at 12:48 PM
|
p.1324 #11Sony FE Images Thread
Ronny here is a Wedding pro who has been using the r2 alot:
"Sony A7R2 low light autofocus:
Sadly it doesn’t perform as well as a DSLR in low light. Focusing is good. But it’s really not up to the job in low light. Lots of hunting and plenty of out of focus shots. I would not want to photograph the bride walking down the aisle in the church with it, or any key moments that happen in poor light."
http://albertpalmerphotography.com/for-photographers/sony-a7rii-review-from-a-wedding-photographer/
I've read complaints in other places also, but there are others claiming it's great. Maybe there is an issue with the body in your case.
Reading more specific reviews: the r2 is better in low light than all previous A7x. In tracking it's still behind the DSLRs, but for non-moving subjects this guys was getting good low light AF with FE55
http://www.yannickciancanelli.com/a7r-ii-review-06-auto-focus/#.VnRXvHga2fQ
And here DPR seems to confirm Bob, Rene, and Werner's view (and includes the 35/1.4):
reprazent1 wrote:
yeah there's nothing like getting up close and personal and step into deer poop, which is exactly what I did when I took this shot 
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5801/23532974340_3890475a34_o.jpg
Parking around here is getting crowded
Parking Attendant by unoh7, 135/2.8 M
This is the look.....
Watch Elk by unoh7, 135/2.8 M
..the look her mom gives me right before she charges
"Sony A7R2 low light autofocus:
Sadly it doesn’t perform as well as a DSLR in low light. Focusing is good. But it’s really not up to the job in low light. Lots of hunting and plenty of out of focus shots. I would not want to photograph the bride walking down the aisle in the church with it, or any key moments that happen in poor light."
http://albertpalmerphotography.com/for-photographers/sony-a7rii-review-from-a-wedding-photographer/
I've read complaints in other places also, but there are others claiming it's great. Maybe there is an issue with the body in your case.
Reading more specific reviews: the r2 is better in low light than all previous A7x. In tracking it's still behind the DSLRs, but for non-moving subjects this guys was getting good low light AF with FE55http://www.yannickciancanelli.com/a7r-ii-review-06-auto-focus/#.VnRXvHga2fQ
And here DPR seems to confirm Bob, Rene, and Werner's view (and includes the 35/1.4):
reprazent1 wrote:
Luvwine wrote
Taking pics of deer with a 500mm lens? What is the challenge in that? Don't you know that real men use a cell phone? 😜😜😈 https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5801/23532974340_3890475a34_o.jpg
Parking around here is getting crowded
Parking Attendant by unoh7, 135/2.8 M
This is the look.....
Watch Elk by unoh7, 135/2.8 M
..the look her mom gives me right before she charges
Dec 18, 2015 at 12:57 PM
p.1324 #12Sony FE Images Thread
HAPPY HOLIDAYS - From a fellow photo NUT. A cast iron Nutkracker that i restored several years ago.
Harry Palmer
HAPPY HOLIDAYS.
Harry Palmer
HAPPY HOLIDAYS.
Dec 18, 2015 at 01:50 PM
p.1324 #13Sony FE Images Thread
Thanks Charlie
I pass the links
Sony A7 + Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Sony A7 + Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
I pass the links
Sony A7 + Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Sony A7 + Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Dec 18, 2015 at 01:54 PM
p.1324 #14Sony FE Images Thread
Save a prayer...
A 7 II + Minolta MD 35-105
 |
||
 © Nex Barker 2015 |
||
|
A 7 II + Minolta MD 35-105
Dec 18, 2015 at 03:20 PM
p.1324 #16Sony FE Images Thread
This is a crap shot, I know...but I just wanted to post because it shows the qualities of the EF 100/2 so well, and I'm really enjoying this lens on the A7 II. Very sharp and gorgeous bokeh.
Dec 18, 2015 at 03:51 PM
p.1324 #18Sony FE Images Thread
An impromptu astrophotography 1½ hours after purchasing the 50/1.1 Nokton. As the aberrations show, it's not really suited for the challenges of starry sky, but I'm pretty happy still.. 24 Geminids in half an hour:
Geminids 2015 by Samuli Ikäheimo, on Flickr
Geminids 2015 by Samuli Ikäheimo, on FlickrDec 18, 2015 at 04:23 PM
p.1324 #19Sony FE Images Thread
Ronny _Olsson wrote:
Hi guys ..
Need tips and help ..
Have a friend who just bought Sony A7R II and Fe 35 f1.4 and Batis 85 1.8
He has big trouble with AF in low light .. it does not lock
Sometimes he think it as AF stop completely
even outdoors in better light has FE 35 not wanted to lock and has been hunting
Need some advice
Could it be something wrong with the camera?
Wrong settings?
does not feel that it would be wrong on two lenses (all the stuff is new)
How do you feel that Batis 85 1.8 Fe 35 f1.4 and A7R II AF in...Show more →
Hi Ronnie. Superb series!! The AF is terrible on the video, and I also have not experienced this issue. I would suggest as Joshua has mentioned, that for low light do not use the small flexible point. This does slow down the AF in low light in particular. If he retests the central region only, I think he will find completely different AF performance. If not there is a definite problem.
Hi guys ..
Need tips and help ..
Have a friend who just bought Sony A7R II and Fe 35 f1.4 and Batis 85 1.8
He has big trouble with AF in low light .. it does not lock
Sometimes he think it as AF stop completely
even outdoors in better light has FE 35 not wanted to lock and has been hunting
Need some advice
Could it be something wrong with the camera?
Wrong settings?
does not feel that it would be wrong on two lenses (all the stuff is new)
How do you feel that Batis 85 1.8 Fe 35 f1.4 and A7R II AF in...Show more →
Hi Ronnie. Superb series!! The AF is terrible on the video, and I also have not experienced this issue. I would suggest as Joshua has mentioned, that for low light do not use the small flexible point. This does slow down the AF in low light in particular. If he retests the central region only, I think he will find completely different AF performance. If not there is a definite problem.
Dec 18, 2015 at 04:49 PM
p.1324 #20Sony FE Images Thread
sikaheimo wrote:
An impromptu astrophotography 1½ hours after purchasing the 50/1.1 Nokton. As the aberrations show, it's not really suited for the challenges of starry sky, but I'm pretty happy still.. 24 Geminids in half an hour:
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5769/23463383159_b38f3b6c4f_b.Geminids 2015 by Samuli Ikäheimo, on Flickr
Wow! Was that half an hour wide open at f/1.1? Looks pretty good to me.
Taken with A7r and Leica WATE - most likely at 16mm.
Dave
Rainbow Point, Bryce Canyon NP
An impromptu astrophotography 1½ hours after purchasing the 50/1.1 Nokton. As the aberrations show, it's not really suited for the challenges of starry sky, but I'm pretty happy still.. 24 Geminids in half an hour:
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5769/23463383159_b38f3b6c4f_b.Geminids 2015 by Samuli Ikäheimo, on Flickr
Wow! Was that half an hour wide open at f/1.1? Looks pretty good to me.
Taken with A7r and Leica WATE - most likely at 16mm.
Dave
 |
||
 |
||
|
Rainbow Point, Bryce Canyon NP
Dec 18, 2015 at 05:01 PM