fredmiranda.com Login
This topic is in the 2013 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.

Archive 2013Panasonic Image Thread

  
 
neitmrh15
Offline
Details
p.8 #1Panasonic Image Thread
Jul 16, 2014 at 10:03 AM
jhinkey
Offline
Details
p.8 #2Panasonic Image Thread
neitmrh15 wrote:
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5534/9442252379_7d2fb81054_b.jpgKayaking in New Hampshire by hobbesmrh, on Flickr


Nice!
What lens and camera did you use?
Jul 16, 2014 at 10:23 AM
neitmrh15
Offline
Details
p.8 #3Panasonic Image Thread
GF1, with a Canon FD 28mm 2.8 I believe.
Jul 16, 2014 at 12:26 PM
srhphoto
Offline
Details
p.8 #4Panasonic Image Thread
Jul 16, 2014 at 02:49 PM
Wilbus
Offline
Details
p.8 #5Panasonic Image Thread


I'm looking forward to the Pany 150/2.8 . . . . though I need to sell some gear to afford one.



I'm not completely sure but I believe Panasonic have mentioned they will not produce that lens. Was on 43rumors a while ago I believe, like I said, not sure but I hope it is wrong as I was looking forward to it too. Perhaps they don't see a point with it when Olympus releases the 40-150 F2.8?

Jul 18, 2014 at 03:39 AM
taran
Offline
Details
p.8 #6Panasonic Image Thread
gx7 25mm fujian

bkodak0055e by artistwithlight, on Flickr

Edited on Aug 01, 2014 at 05:45 PM · View previous versions
Jul 18, 2014 at 05:39 PM
darrellc
Offline
Details
p.8 #7Panasonic Image Thread
GH4 and PL15


P1030657 by DarrellC, on Flickr


P1030647 by DarrellC, on Flickr


P1030657-2 by DarrellC, on Flickr
Jul 20, 2014 at 12:54 AM
jhinkey
Offline
Details
p.8 #8Panasonic Image Thread
Wilbus wrote:
Earlier quoteI'm looking forward to the Pany 150/2.8 . . . . though I need to sell some gear to afford one.
I'm not completely sure but I believe Panasonic have mentioned they will not produce that lens. Was on 43rumors a while ago I believe, like I said, not sure but I hope it is wrong as I was looking forward to it too. Perhaps they don't see a point with it when Olympus releases the 40-150 F2.8?



Latest rumors are that Panasonic WILL produce the 150/2.8. It will likely be more compact, lighter weight, have OIS, and likely better IQ than the 40-150/2.8 if Pany does it right. I believe the rumor had it being delayed somewhat.
Jul 21, 2014 at 03:44 PM
dalite
Offline
Details
p.8 #9Panasonic Image Thread
OK, I'll jump into the ring with my Lumix DMC-FZ200
f2.8/24-600mm. Great depth of field with its tiny sensor. The sea otter photo was shot at 600mm from a bobbing inflatable craft.


























Jul 23, 2014 at 09:58 PM
dalite
Offline
Details
p.8 #10Panasonic Image Thread
More with the DMC-FZ200

1. Black Crowned Night Heron. Uncropped.

2. Tiger Swallowtail butterfly. 600mm












Jul 23, 2014 at 10:41 PM
dalite
Offline
Details
p.8 #11Panasonic Image Thread
More.

This is equivalent to 600mm (108mm x 5.6)





Aug 01, 2014 at 05:08 PM
darrellc
Offline
Details
p.8 #12Panasonic Image Thread
GM1 with 12-32 kit lens on SFO-SEA flight




Aug 01, 2014 at 11:11 PM
traveler
Offline
Details
p.8 #13Panasonic Image Thread
One from the new FZ1000. This camera rocks flowers to be sure. This one OOC resized.

http://www.pbase.com/traveler/image/156828865/original.jpg
Aug 02, 2014 at 08:38 AM
eno789
Offline
Details
p.8 #14Panasonic Image Thread
In Denali NP, Alaska


Denali South Peak


Panny 100-300mm, GH2
Aug 02, 2014 at 05:04 PM
dalite
Offline
Details
p.8 #15Panasonic Image Thread
Denali is awesome.
Aug 02, 2014 at 05:34 PM
absolutic
Offline
Details
p.8 #16Panasonic Image Thread
I got this camera with a kit lens couple days ago for my short Vegas trip. I was accompanying my wife who was going to a convention. I was worried because the last time we went to Vegas, and I had Sony A7r+35FE lens, the security at one of the fancy clubs did not want to let me in, so my wife had to hide the camera in her purse. This time, with GM1 kit it was a breeze because the camera literally looks smaller than most point-and-shoots and no problems bringing it in anywhere. Although my wife herself is not happy with how the kit lens renders her portraits (she prefers 135MM FL at least for her portraits and yells at me if I use anything shorter), the kit lens was good for general shots and after playing with Raw and Jpegs, I resorted to shooting Jpegs and left ISO up to 3200. My last m43 camera before GM1 was Olympus OMD EM5 and whatever DXO thinks, it appears to my eyes that low light shots are cleaner on GM1 than they were on EM5.



























Aug 04, 2014 at 12:07 AM
dalite
Offline
Details
p.8 #17Panasonic Image Thread
Your portrait of the sea eagle is spot on and sharp!
Aug 15, 2014 at 10:57 PM
dalite
Offline
Details
p.8 #18Panasonic Image Thread
Jman13 wrote:
I'm truly amazed at how little there is in this thread. I guess I'm as guilty as anyone, but still surprising. Took my GX1 out with the 15/1.7 so I could use the aperture ring. What a nice small combo.

This is at f/2.8:

http://www.jordansteele.com/2014/coneflowers_leveque.jpg

_____

Nice composition and rear defocus.
Aug 15, 2014 at 10:59 PM
dalite
Offline
Details
p.8 #19Panasonic Image Thread
Bifurcator wrote:
No images here for 8 months? Hey!!!

EDIT… I wonder why the search results listed this thread as not having been posted to in 8 months… OK… strange…

EDIT: EDIT: Oh great… now after editing a message uploaded images stop showing their EXIF info? When did that start happening?


______
The third one for me (shades of Monet!) and the last one. Beautiful.
Aug 15, 2014 at 11:00 PM
RustyBug
Offline
Details
p.8 #20Panasonic Image Thread
From the DMC-FZ1000
(100% crop of small 1824x1824 jpg sooc)




Aug 16, 2014 at 06:20 AM
FM ForumsLeica & Alternative GearJoin Upload & Sell
  
 

You are not logged inLog inRegister