Ironically, the eBay seller is standing by his "no returns" policy despite me sending quite a detailed request to him with sample photos. I guess some people feel they can sell junk and as long as they claim "no returns" they are protected. I don't think eBay will agree with that line of thinking come the 26th when the 3-day waiting period expires and they will step in on the return request. Your photos will help the cause.
I am trying to work out a similar issue with returning a camera body which arrived displaying a "shutter error". I researched EBAY returns quite a bit and found that there really is no such thing as seller "No Returns" on EBAY if you received a defective purchase or something other than as described.
The main downside is that they give the seller a lot of time before EBAY forces them to do the right thing. Just be sure to initiate the EBAY/PayPal return process and do all of your communication through EBAY messaging. Similarly they have a mechanism for you to upload your photos for proof. Also do not threaten to leave bad seller feedback as this is an EBAY no-no. Wait until you have received your refund and then leave it otherwise it is considered badgering.
Thanks for the tips. Fortunately, in my 15 years on eBay I've had very few sellers like this guy. eBay/PayPal does an excellent job, I my opinion, in protecting their buyers. Sometimes it does take a while, but that's worth it to me to have the confidence to buy at sometimes ridiculously cheap prices.
This guy doesn't have a leg to stand on but he feels his policy is ironclad. I told him I'd (well, eBay acting as MY agent) will "be in touch soon."
sedohr wrote:
Thanks for the tips. Fortunately, in my 15 years on eBay I've had very few sellers like this guy. eBay/PayPal does an excellent job, I my opinion, in protecting their buyers. Sometimes it does take a while, but that's worth it to me to have the confidence to buy at sometimes ridiculously cheap prices.
This guy doesn't have a leg to stand on but he feels his policy is ironclad. I told him I'd (well, eBay acting as MY agent) will "be in touch soon."
Hope your issue is resolved quickly.
Randy
Ohio
My guy finally came through and I got a refund!
Just so I keep the thread on the OPs topic, do you know if the non-macro version of this lens has the same wonderful IQ?
Spaabeck wrote:
Just so I keep the thread on the OPs topic, do you know if the non-macro version of this lens has the same wonderful IQ?
I did some pretty extensive research and found no difference between the two models. The non-macro version is the one Leica branded under their own name.
BTW, I received a 2nd copy of the lens today and was able to prove the previous copy is def flawed. Really impressed with the lens on the a7r after only using it for a couple shots today.
Curious about this lens as I have one on the way. I shoot through Minolta Primes often on my GH4 using the Speedbooster from Metabones, which is a glass adapter that focuses the image and corrects it for smaller sensors, improving IQ, aperture and width. It's wonderful. But the adapter page suggests that this lens won't fit on the adapter without modification of the aperture lever. Can anyone suggest to me why this is the case, if they have one of these lenses?
bvphotos wrote:
The serial number on my OM lens is 204551. What does that tell you?
BTW, I was able to buy an MD 35-70/3.5 today. I'm going to compare the copies I have of the MD and OM lenses. It will be unscientific, but I'll update with my findings.
.......only that it is older than ones I've tried, 240...., 220... and now 230... ;o)
I received my third copy today....+fungus, loose focus ring and "rattly" front elements! (Described as "Very Good") Doh!
You did well to get a good copy, and cheaply.
I'm looking forward to your comparison now, mine is obviously on long "hold"!
harvey steeves wrote:
to sedohr, personally, I like the black and white - would look good as a decent sized metal print.
Thanks Harvey. I had a Groupon left over for an 8x10 metal so I sent the B&W off to see how it looks. Not that an 8x10 will do this justice, but the price was right.
The MD 35-70 Macro proved itself yesterday. I'm having a blast shooting these vintage, sharp lenses on a state of the art body. Kinda unusual... like me.
I've got the MD 45-200 f4.5 waiting for me at work. Can't wait to give that one a whirl.
Can anyone point me to a disassembly guide of some sort for this lens?
Love this lens, but the ones I've encountered all had loose focusrings. Hoping to improve mine.
Bought one of these locally on a whim from what I've seen and read here, got the one that appears to be identical to the leica version. Pretty good lens, my Mino 28-135mm f4-4.5 is sharper stopped down, and wide open my Canon nFD 35-70mm f4 is a lot better (I have a bizarrely good copy of that lens though). Probably going to sell it, how much do these things go for? As far as I remember my initial tests showed it to be pretty clean inside, will have to double check tonight
I just got this lens. Still getting the hang of it, and I'll be first to admit that my skills with manual lenses need honing, but I'm very pleased with it. All pics with the a6000
Nexed wrote:
I just got this lens. Still getting the hang of it, and I'll be first to admit that my skills with manual lenses need honing, but I'm very pleased with it. All pics with the a6000
Very cool and nice shots Be sure to take down your WTB for this lens, unless you're looking for another!
(yes, yes, I actually just searched for this here and found your thread...I regret selling mine!)
thanks for the kind words
as folks have mentioned previously the lens LOVES backlit subjects with filtered light in the background
i'm glad i finally found one for myself
Love that lens!