You have a lot of details on the pricing site, more than is necessary I think. I would try and condense that info a bit.
weddings - $1950-3200 tops.
All other sessions as posted. If you're hoping that people spend more than just the session fee, tell them what to buy/what people buy and give a figure for that too.
Thanks. Not sure what galleries add? Do most people have them?
Just that there is no quick way to see your work as a body of work. It's blog post to blog post. Now if you are continually posting better and better work, then cool. But I know that my "best of the best" I didn't shoot 2 weeks ago. If I'm hiring an artist, I'd want to see their best work honestly.
Guillaume de B wrote:
Hi Spencer, I'd love your feedback. Thanks so much for taking the time to do this. I feel like I learn a great deal just reading your responses to other people's sites.
www.debasly.com
Nice site, clean and simple, text easy to read and information is condensed and to the point.
Not yet. Honestly, I only put pricing up on there just about a week ago.
I put the top figure up there because my thinking was that it'll make it easier for clients to rationalize buying the $3,400 deal because "It's not the most expensive, so therefore I'm not overspending".
Aun no he puesto las tarifas en el sitio de espanol porque no veo muchos visitantes en ese sitio.
Thanks once again, this is very kind of you to offer this insight.
$2200-3600. Do you get people booking your top package?
Your site in spanish didn't list prices. ¿Por que no?
As your opening line to your pricing, I think this kind of contradicts yourself.
"Full day wedding coverage! Our only concern is creating amazing images for you, not worrying about how long we’ve been shooting; If you’re planning a smaller, intimate celebration, be sure to ask about our half-day discount"
You imply that a great deal of value is placed on your being there ALL day, and you're not worried about time. But then you go on and say you'll charge them less if they only want a half-day approach. I'm curious on your ratio of people booking full-day vs half-day.
Nikon_14 wrote:
Not yet. Honestly, I only put pricing up on there just about a week ago.
I put the top figure up there because my thinking was that it'll make it easier for clients to rationalize buying the $3,400 deal because "It's not the most expensive, so therefore I'm not overspending".
I didn't think you would be booking that top package, but if its only there to make package #2 look less expensive then good on you I think you could move people up by making a 4th package, and re-arrange package #3 to be less expensive. Give them a reason to go to that package, rather than just analyzing "how much more do I get than 2" pricing mentality. Maybe show how much of a "savings" there would be with #3.
sboerup wrote:
Why is "Digital Negative DVD" in quotes, isn't that what its called and known to be called?
£1600-2250
I think you are too cheap!
Thanks for the feedback Spencer. I guess I bung Digital Negative DVD in quotes because it doesn't actually include DNG files or RAWs. It includes the modern day equivalent of processed negatives, that is to say JPEGs in full resolution that allows the client the ability to reproduce their images.
That said, I've never been fully satisfied with the wording there. Will ponder on it.
deeno wrote:
I thought about doing this last time, I'm glad it came up again.
www.picsbydan.com (currently working on a re-design)
I think your pricing information is scattered across multiple pages. I think having everything condensed to one page is very very helpful to consumers. It'd be like walking in to McD's and seeing menus at the register, in the bathroom, play place, etc...making people walk to different areas to find different options.
So, I don't think you NEED to have all those options posted in order for someone to get the impulse to hire you. The detail stuff should be something you walk them through and help them once they've committed to booking.
So if i'm a customer on your site, I'll expect $2k-3k.
I think you could move people up by making a 4th package, and re-arrange package #3 to be less expensive. Give them a reason to go to that package, rather than just analyzing "how much more do I get than 2" pricing mentality. Maybe show how much of a "savings" there would be with #3.