fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              68              70              150       151       end
  

The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2

  
 
Elijah
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #1 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


4mpx wrote:

D4s, 200/2 VRI+TC-17EII.


http://i.imgur.com/4sDAewP.jpg





http://i.imgur.com/UDp9ECF.jpg


What do you get for a wide aperture with 1.7x? f/3.2 or something?



Feb 19, 2016 at 11:48 PM
4mpx
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #2 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


Elijah wrote:
What do you get for a wide aperture with 1.7x? f/3.2 or something?


On the camera, I get f/3.3 wide open.




Feb 20, 2016 at 01:54 PM
Elijah
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #3 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


Went through this entire thread a few times and honestly, no offence to the monkey and 4mpx, but those bird shots are getting boring.

Cannot wait to get this lens this weekend. You'll be seeing LOTS of stuff from me once the wedding season starts.... Not a single one of them will be a bird



Feb 22, 2016 at 09:08 AM
sjms
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.69 #4 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


yeah but it will be wedding stuff (and you think too many birds are boring?) and really, we need not be threatened like that


Feb 22, 2016 at 09:17 AM
stevez32
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #5 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2















Feb 22, 2016 at 09:37 AM
trenchmonkey
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #6 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


no offence to the monkey and 4mpx, but those bird shots are getting boring.
Hmmm, guess you missed the rodeo/horse portrait/candid posts...



Feb 22, 2016 at 09:42 AM
Elijah
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #7 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


sjms wrote:
yeah but it will be wedding stuff (and you think too many birds are boring?) and really, we need not be threatened like that


---------------------------------------------

trenchmonkey wrote:
Hmmm, guess you missed the rodeo/horse portrait/candid posts...


I was expecting these replies after stirring the pot



Feb 22, 2016 at 09:51 AM
sjms
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.69 #8 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


then, for once, you got what you were expecting


Feb 22, 2016 at 09:53 AM
Elijah
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #9 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


stevez32 wrote:
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-I6wQGhB7oEM/Vsscty5wp8I/AAAAAAAAWi0/R71JTnoV-yc/s1600/Family-102.jpg

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-whEoNcK9Qn4/VsscunUjEXI/AAAAAAAAWi4/8OrLCaZ67us/s1600/Family-206.jpg


This, is what I want to see more!! Not some birdies



Feb 22, 2016 at 10:01 AM
sjms
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.69 #10 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


granted it is a pretty picture and quite personal. everyone does what they do. but tell me was a 200/2 really needed for that shot? did that really make the difference in the composition? I think not.


Feb 22, 2016 at 10:10 AM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

Elijah
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #11 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


sjms wrote:
granted it is a pretty picture and quite personal. everyone does what they do. but tell me was a 200/2 really needed for that shot? did that really make the difference in the composition? I think not.


Umm... What's the whole point of 200/2 then?!



Feb 22, 2016 at 11:22 AM
Chris Court
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #12 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


From a recent shoot…

C







Feb 22, 2016 at 11:58 AM
stevez32
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #13 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


sjms wrote:
granted it is a pretty picture and quite personal. everyone does what they do. but tell me was a 200/2 really needed for that shot? did that really make the difference in the composition? I think not.


Which photo are we talking about here? I interpret composition to be related to focal length, so yes the composition at the same spot with a 200mm 4.0 lens will be the same as a 200mm at F2.0, but the rest of the image reproduction will be quite different. Otherwise, I agree, you definitely don't need a F2.0 lens if you just want to compose images at 200mm, there are cheaper ways of getting images at that focal length.



Feb 22, 2016 at 12:22 PM
sjms
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.69 #14 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


Elijah wrote:
Umm... What's the whole point of 200/2 then?!


i do wonder about that sometimes myself



Feb 22, 2016 at 12:34 PM
sjms
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.69 #15 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


stevez32 wrote:
Which photo are we talking about here? I interpret composition to be related to focal length, so yes the composition at the same spot with a 200mm 4.0 lens will be the same as a 200mm at F2.0, but the rest of the image reproduction will be quite different. Otherwise, I agree, you definitely don't need a F2.0 lens if you just want to compose images at 200mm, there are cheaper ways of getting images at that focal length.


using 20ft as the mark

at f2.0 you DOF is 0.35ft
19.8 to 20.2'

at f2.8 your DOF is 0.5ft
19.8 to 20.3'

at f4.0 your DOF is 0.71ft
19.7-20.4'

get closer it shrinks further it grows

please explain compositionally how it would be different.



Feb 22, 2016 at 12:48 PM
NightOwl Cat
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.69 #16 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


Time for this...




Feb 22, 2016 at 05:00 PM
stevez32
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #17 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


sjms wrote:
using 20ft as the mark

at f2.0 you DOF is 0.35ft
19.8 to 20.2'

at f2.8 your DOF is 0.5ft
19.8 to 20.3'

at f4.0 your DOF is 0.71ft
19.7-20.4'

get closer it shrinks further it grows

please explain compositionally how it would be different.


It wouldn't be compositionally different, that is my point. Regardless of the DOF, all images from a 200mm focal length lens taken a the same point will compose (i.e., constitute) the same objects/subject.



Feb 22, 2016 at 05:24 PM
sjms
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.69 #18 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


ok please explain the of the image reproduction difference.


Feb 22, 2016 at 05:27 PM
stevez32
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.69 #19 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


sjms wrote:
ok please explain the of the image reproduction difference.


Between what? What does image reproduction difference mean?



Feb 22, 2016 at 05:32 PM
sjms
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.69 #20 · The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2


but the rest of the image reproduction will be quite different

quote from you



Feb 22, 2016 at 05:36 PM
1       2       3              68              70              150       151       end






FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              68              70              150       151       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account