I think those of you who are culling (potentially otherwise good) shots due to the faux-nekkid thing are nuts.
It's all about context.
Yeah I can see how someone might not be crazy about a shot that might be interpreted (by a perv?) as a nekkid shot of them on it's own.
But in the context of a set I can't imagine that someone would EVER confuse Candice or Jim's shot when it's presented bookended by other photos taken clearly around the same exact time where the gown is now visible.
Same goes for that close-up of the jewelry...
I'm just thrilled to see that chicks can have a dirtier mind than dudes. I would not have interpreted Candice's cropped photo as "da bride is nekkid"
However I must have somewhat of a sense of decorum. I went back and took a look at a few recent weddings where the bride wore a strapless dress. The only pic I found where I cropped out part of the dress is this one.
Alessandro, it doesn't have anything to do with a dirty mind, it's just not flattering. It makes you look wider and there's too much skin with nothing to break it up.
lisy78 wrote:
I think those of you who are culling (potentially otherwise good) shots due to the faux-nekkid thing are nuts.
It's all about context.
Yeah I can see how someone might not be crazy about a shot that might be interpreted (by a perv?) as a nekkid shot of them on it's own.
But in the context of a set I can't imagine that someone would EVER confuse Candice or Jim's shot when it's presented bookended by other photos taken clearly around the same exact time where the gown is now visible.
Same goes for that close-up of the jewelry...
I'm just thrilled to see that chicks can have a dirtier mind than dudes. I would not have interpreted Candice's cropped photo as "da bride is nekkid"...Show more →
+1
I think people are going over the top with this whole thing.
I had a bunch of bridesmaids & the bride in my photo booth and they all looked naked.... and to top it off, they were all looking down as if they were checking out the view, I had to explain to others who saw the images that they indeed had clothes on. the things drunk people do!
I think I have done well to avoid the "naked" bride look I do remember one time doing some self portrait type images that looked like I was not wearing anything, well almost true, head shots wearing only a towel
lisy78 wrote:
I think those of you who are culling (potentially otherwise good) shots due to the faux-nekkid thing are nuts.
It's all about context.
Yeah I can see how someone might not be crazy about a shot that might be interpreted (by a perv?) as a nekkid shot of them on it's own.
But in the context of a set I can't imagine that someone would EVER confuse Candice or Jim's shot when it's presented bookended by other photos taken clearly around the same exact time where the gown is now visible.
Same goes for that close-up of the jewelry...
I'm just thrilled to see that chicks can have a dirtier mind than dudes. I would not have interpreted Candice's cropped photo as "da bride is nekkid"...Show more →
I'm thrilled Ale's never thought of that before. I never would have guessed.
OL. True story.
