This topic is in the 2012 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2012Sony RX100 Picture Thread
p.16 #1Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Nice photos everyone! This little camera gives me fits. It's already resulted in my selling off my NEX system and I'm left with FF (a99) and this little sucker. It's so good and so perfectly suits my needs for skiing and climbing I really don't know how they'll top it. Maybe a bit wider and more zoom? Anyway, here's a shot from a back country ski trip last weekend.
http://verndewit.com/img/s8/v85/p1376720778.jpg
http://verndewit.com/img/s8/v85/p1376720778.jpg
Jan 12, 2013 at 11:01 AM
p.16 #3Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Visited Joshua Tree National Park a couple weeks ago...havent processed them all yet but here are two I liked:
[/url]
[/url]
Two from a recent trip downtown Chicago:
[/url]
[/url]
[/url][/url]Two from a recent trip downtown Chicago:
[/url][/url]Jan 13, 2013 at 03:39 AM
p.16 #4Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Beautiful Vern.
Longing for the outside world by Jochen-B, on Flickr
Longing for the outside world by Jochen-B, on Flickr
Jan 14, 2013 at 01:47 PM
p.16 #5Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Here's two from a late night outing. This might be the only astrophotography-capable pocket camera out there.
 |
||
| http://i.minus.com/i3mPZfViWNJex.jpg | ||
|
|
||
| http://i.minus.com/ibeIAOATjzBQdc.jpg | ||
|
Jan 15, 2013 at 12:35 PM
p.16 #6Sony RX100 Picture Thread
trale wrote:
Here's two from a late night outing. This might be the only astrophotography-capable pocket camera out there.
Not bad! Were you zoomed or wide on these? Only reason I ask is that the f/1.9 at full wide angle is the best way to get lots of stars showing up. The tricky part for me is the focusing... Here's one from a mountain climbing trip last year taken at ISO 3200 wide open for around 20 seconds:
http://verndewit.com/img/s1/v54/p1078952234.jpg
Here's two from a late night outing. This might be the only astrophotography-capable pocket camera out there.
Not bad! Were you zoomed or wide on these? Only reason I ask is that the f/1.9 at full wide angle is the best way to get lots of stars showing up. The tricky part for me is the focusing... Here's one from a mountain climbing trip last year taken at ISO 3200 wide open for around 20 seconds:
http://verndewit.com/img/s1/v54/p1078952234.jpg
Jan 15, 2013 at 01:50 PM
p.16 #7Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Mine were 30 second eposures on ISO 3200. Yes they were on wide angle, but then again 28mm isn't really wide lol.
I like the framing of yours more.
In hindsight, I should have done a shorter exposure (20sec) and ISO 1600 would have sufficed.
I'll remember this the next time I'm in a good location (and moonless, clear night) for these type of shots again.
I like the framing of yours more.
In hindsight, I should have done a shorter exposure (20sec) and ISO 1600 would have sufficed.
I'll remember this the next time I'm in a good location (and moonless, clear night) for these type of shots again.
Jan 15, 2013 at 03:37 PM
Jan 16, 2013 at 04:51 PM
p.16 #9Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Last full day with the RX100 before I have to send it back. Didn't have much time to shoot, but here it is...some lower light stuff:
@ ISO 3200:
http://www.jordansteele.com/2013/chloe_lean.jpg
@ ISO 400:
http://www.jordansteele.com/2013/reynoldsburg_hs.jpg
@ISO 800:
http://www.jordansteele.com/2013/door_shadows.jpg
@ ISO 3200:
http://www.jordansteele.com/2013/chloe_lean.jpg
@ ISO 400:
http://www.jordansteele.com/2013/reynoldsburg_hs.jpg
@ISO 800:
http://www.jordansteele.com/2013/door_shadows.jpg
Jan 16, 2013 at 07:43 PM
p.16 #10Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Also posted in the landscapes forum but it's with an RX100 so... 
In this view from the summit of Mount Fryatt you can see the 4th and 5th Geraldine Lakes and numerous other, unnamed lakes as well as Mount Edith Cavell which is a much more popular 11,000er than Fryatt due to it's close proximity to civilization. Hwy #93 snakes through the scene on far right.
http://verndewit.com/img/s2/v70/p1391249334.jpg
In this view from the summit of Mount Fryatt you can see the 4th and 5th Geraldine Lakes and numerous other, unnamed lakes as well as Mount Edith Cavell which is a much more popular 11,000er than Fryatt due to it's close proximity to civilization. Hwy #93 snakes through the scene on far right.
http://verndewit.com/img/s2/v70/p1391249334.jpg
Jan 21, 2013 at 02:33 PM
p.16 #11Sony RX100 Picture Thread
|
||
| http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8185/8418732081_ab5010f4ec_c.jpg | ||
|
Jan 27, 2013 at 04:28 AM
DavidWEGS
Offline
[X]
Details
p.16 #14Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Nice Fotographiq, is that in cam HDR?
Jan 29, 2013 at 10:49 AM
p.16 #16Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Jman - on the grip - I ordered the flip back 4. Ill let you know what I think as I find it almost too small as well. Not small....slick. Great camera. Sony did seem to clean the dust off the sensor, but it worries me for the future.
Keep the zipper cases handy.
Keep the zipper cases handy.
Jan 30, 2013 at 09:09 PM
p.16 #17Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Rocky Point - Big Sur Califorina
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2088441/_DSC0105.JPG
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2088441/_DSC0105.JPG
Feb 04, 2013 at 02:31 PM
p.16 #18Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Paul, I think you need to remove the 's' from https, but before you do that, please downscale the photo to something like 1000 on the long side; it is huge at the moment!
Feb 04, 2013 at 03:01 PM
p.16 #19Sony RX100 Picture Thread
BC Mountains from a dirty airline window:
|
||
| http://www.pbase.com/sc_20170/image/148664628/original.jpg | ||
|
Feb 06, 2013 at 09:26 PM
p.16 #20Sony RX100 Picture Thread
Here are some completely different from this thread.
One complaint. I want to turn nr OFF in jpg.
Here I go
Wait a second
One complaint. I want to turn nr OFF in jpg.
Here I go
Wait a second
Feb 23, 2013 at 10:12 AM