Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
p.202 #1Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
All with the XF 23mm and X-S10
Our Wedding Flowers by Daniel Lee
Father of the Bride by Daniel Lee
The Bridal Party by Daniel Lee
Our Wedding Flowers by Daniel Lee
Father of the Bride by Daniel Lee
The Bridal Party by Daniel Lee
Oct 05, 2022 at 04:30 AM
p.202 #2Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
I like this lens ... iz sharp as expected from a macro lens. It's like a little mini version of the FE 65 F2 from voigtlander.
X-Pro3 VOIGTLANDER MACRO APO-ULTRON 35mm F2 lens 35mm f/4.0 1/500s 160 ISO 0.0 EV
X-Pro3 VOIGTLANDER MACRO APO-ULTRON 35mm F2 lens 35mm f/5.6 1/30s 400 ISO 0.0 EV
X-Pro3 VOIGTLANDER MACRO APO-ULTRON 35mm F2 lens 35mm f/5.6 1/30s 400 ISO 0.0 EV
Oct 06, 2022 at 01:00 PM
p.202 #3Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
molson wrote:
Edited on Oct 08, 2022 at 05:53 PM · View previous versions
Edited on Oct 08, 2022 at 05:53 PM · View previous versions
Oct 06, 2022 at 03:04 PM
p.202 #5Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Photosbydlee wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52412659394_66a7bfe23c_h.jpg
Wet Leaves by Daniel Lee
Lovely. Do you like the Fuji better or your Sony AIV?
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52412659394_66a7bfe23c_h.jpg
Wet Leaves by Daniel Lee
Lovely. Do you like the Fuji better or your Sony AIV?
Oct 08, 2022 at 08:05 AM
p.202 #6Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.
 |
||
 |
||
 |
X-E2S XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR lens 400mm f/5.6 1/420s 6400 ISO 0.0 EV
Oct 08, 2022 at 10:49 AM
p.202 #7Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
molson wrote:
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.
There is a lot of light in the shot for ISO 6400, so it's not the best indicator of image quality as high ISO.
Other than that, it's a good shot. What kind of feeder is that? I really want to find a way to attract those things around here.
Edited on Oct 08, 2022 at 05:55 PM · View previous versions
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.
There is a lot of light in the shot for ISO 6400, so it's not the best indicator of image quality as high ISO.
Other than that, it's a good shot. What kind of feeder is that? I really want to find a way to attract those things around here.
Edited on Oct 08, 2022 at 05:55 PM · View previous versions
Oct 08, 2022 at 10:54 AM
p.202 #8Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
amci4 wrote:
That did not need to be shot at ISO 6400, so it's not the best indicator of image quality as high ISO.
What a clueless comment...
Maybe you should stick to your smartphone snapshots.
molson wrote
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.What a clueless comment...
Maybe you should stick to your smartphone snapshots.
Oct 08, 2022 at 11:41 AM
p.202 #9Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
amci4 wrote:
molson wrote
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.Other than that, it's a good shot. What kind of feeder is that? I really want to find a way to attract those things around here.
Well if it had been at 400iso, SS 1/25th. Good luck getting a bird to sit still that long, or getting a sharp picture with a 100-400, it really WOULD be mushy. A great pic, IMHO of course!
Gerry
Oct 08, 2022 at 01:22 PM
p.202 #10Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
amci4 wrote:
That did not need to be shot at ISO 6400, so it's not the best indicator of image quality as high ISO.
Other than that, it's a good shot. What kind of feeder is that? I really want to find a way to attract those things around here.
My wife does a lot of bird photography. molson's shutter speed at 1/420 is really a bare minimum for that kind of shot.
Small birds are really a PITA to get good photos of. They are so small and fast. Twitching all the time and the slightest movement or sound and they are gone.
molson wrote
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.Other than that, it's a good shot. What kind of feeder is that? I really want to find a way to attract those things around here.
My wife does a lot of bird photography. molson's shutter speed at 1/420 is really a bare minimum for that kind of shot.
Small birds are really a PITA to get good photos of. They are so small and fast. Twitching all the time and the slightest movement or sound and they are gone.
Oct 08, 2022 at 01:33 PM
|
p.202 #11Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
molson wrote:
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.
Nice shot.
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.
Nice shot.
Oct 08, 2022 at 01:44 PM
p.202 #12Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
molson wrote:
That did not need to be shot at ISO 6400, so it's not the best indicator of image quality as high ISO.What a clueless comment...
Maybe you should stick to your smartphone snapshots.
It was sitting still. You probably could have run at 1/100 and had no issues with that shot. I stand by that statement, there’s too much light for that to be a true example of what ISO 6400 would deliver when it was needed.
Edited on Oct 08, 2022 at 05:27 PM · View previous versions
amci4 wrote
molson wrote
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.Maybe you should stick to your smartphone snapshots.
It was sitting still. You probably could have run at 1/100 and had no issues with that shot. I stand by that statement, there’s too much light for that to be a true example of what ISO 6400 would deliver when it was needed.
Edited on Oct 08, 2022 at 05:27 PM · View previous versions
Oct 08, 2022 at 05:23 PM
p.202 #13Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
goodbokeh wrote:
That did not need to be shot at ISO 6400, so it's not the best indicator of image quality as high ISO.
Other than that, it's a good shot. What kind of feeder is that? I really want to find a way to attract those things around here.My wife does a lot of bird photography. molson's shutter speed at 1/420 is really a bare minimum for that kind of shot.
Small birds are really a PITA to get good photos of. They are so small and fast. Twitching all the time and the slightest movement or sound and they are gone.
Oh I’m sure they are, but I would have conceded a faster shutter speed if it had been in flight, and maybe I’m wrong and the thing was moving back and forth before stopping, but still I could see ISO 1600 with that shot.
amci4 wrote
molson wrote
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.Other than that, it's a good shot. What kind of feeder is that? I really want to find a way to attract those things around here.
Small birds are really a PITA to get good photos of. They are so small and fast. Twitching all the time and the slightest movement or sound and they are gone.
Oh I’m sure they are, but I would have conceded a faster shutter speed if it had been in flight, and maybe I’m wrong and the thing was moving back and forth before stopping, but still I could see ISO 1600 with that shot.
Oct 08, 2022 at 05:26 PM
p.202 #14Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
X-T2 and 10-24 WR 
Highlands by Paul Martin, on Flickr
Highlands by Paul Martin, on FlickrOct 08, 2022 at 05:34 PM
p.202 #15Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
fotografur wrote:
Photosbydlee wrote
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52412659394_66a7bfe23c_h.jpgWet Leaves by Daniel Lee
Thank you! I think if I had to pick/keep one it would be the Sony mainly because I love FF and the lenses I have for my Sony, but I really love the Fuji and files it produces! Colors SOOC are really great and even if I do want to edit, I find them really easy to work with! That 33mm is an amazing lens, it will likely be my main walk around lens when I travel!
Oct 09, 2022 at 05:05 AM
p.202 #16Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
amci4 wrote:
That did not need to be shot at ISO 6400, so it's not the best indicator of image quality as high ISO.
Other than that, it's a good shot. What kind of feeder is that? I really want to find a way to attract those things around here.My wife does a lot of bird photography. molson's shutter speed at 1/420 is really a bare minimum for that kind of shot.
Small birds are really a PITA to get good photos of. They are so small and fast. Twitching all the time and the slightest movement or sound and they are gone.Oh I’m sure they are, but I would have conceded a faster shutter speed if it had been in flight, and maybe I’m wrong and the thing was moving back and forth before stopping, but still I could see ISO 1600 with that shot.
I read your answer to my wife Busse. She asks if you have ever photographed small birds?
goodbokeh wrote
amci4 wrote
molson wrote
High ISO with the old X-E2 looks pretty good - as does the mushy XF 100-400 zoom.Other than that, it's a good shot. What kind of feeder is that? I really want to find a way to attract those things around here.
Small birds are really a PITA to get good photos of. They are so small and fast. Twitching all the time and the slightest movement or sound and they are gone.
I read your answer to my wife Busse. She asks if you have ever photographed small birds?
Oct 09, 2022 at 10:08 AM
p.202 #17Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
A cliche.
I know clouds are cliche, but it was a nice morning, and photography, it's all about light.
Panorama taken with the X-Pro3 and the good old Fuji 15-45.
I know clouds are cliche, but it was a nice morning, and photography, it's all about light.
Panorama taken with the X-Pro3 and the good old Fuji 15-45.
|
||
 |
||
|
Oct 09, 2022 at 01:08 PM
p.202 #18Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
Old photo .. I kind of miss breeding reptiles .. so much work and space
X-T3 Touit 2.8/50M lens 50mm f/18.0 1/250s 160 ISO 0.0 EV
X-T2 Touit 2.8/50M lens 50mm f/9.0 1/250s 400 ISO 0.0 EV
Oct 10, 2022 at 08:21 AM
p.202 #20Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
X-T2. 10-24 WR 
Golden Light, Romsdal by Paul Martin, on Flickr
Golden Light, Romsdal by Paul Martin, on FlickrOct 11, 2022 at 06:55 PM