fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
FM Forum Rules
Wedding Resource List
  

FM Forums | Wedding Photographer | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
  

Archive 2012 · wireless trigger question

  
 
vawill84
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · wireless trigger question


I am looking for a wireless trigger that will simply allow me to shoot in manual, and change the power levels manually from the camera. I am having little luck looking anything up b/c there seems to be tons and tons of these little gizmo's out there in the tech world.

I know the radiopoppers/PW's are a good option but I was wondering if there are any cheap alternatives that would allow me to still be able to use HSS and allow me to control the power levels from the camera.

I appreciate the help, I have been mulling this over and researching for a while, but the info appears to be all over the place on these.



Jan 30, 2012 at 08:18 PM
sboerup
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · wireless trigger question


First, what type of flashes do you need to control? Sounds like you need ETTL and HSS correct?


Jan 30, 2012 at 08:19 PM
vawill84
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · wireless trigger question


oh oops sorry, I will be primarily using canon speedlites.

ETTL not so much, but I would definitely like to still be able to use HSS.



Jan 30, 2012 at 08:22 PM
sboerup
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · wireless trigger question


Well ETTL and HSS are inextricably linked, so you can't have HSS without ETTL. Your best bet are the PWs or RadioPoppers. Both are not the most elegant solution, but work well.

May I ask why not just use them in manual?



Jan 30, 2012 at 08:23 PM
vawill84
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · wireless trigger question


For now, I have been getting by using a multiple flash setup with canons wireless system....and it isnt terrible. But when I want to use a softbox, this limits my options since I lose line of sight. In this case I normally use a long ETTL cable, and just hook the flash to it inside of the softbox, but it becomes cumbersome after a while, especially moving to different sites.

I guess its more just the ease of being able to just throw a wireless trigger on it inside the softbox and not having to worry about it is what intrigues me.

Thanks for pointing out the ETTL thing, I guess that really does limit my options to the more expensive triggers. I have heard bad things about PW not doing too well with 580ex2's, so i might have to check out Radiopoppers.



Jan 30, 2012 at 08:30 PM
sboerup
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · wireless trigger question


Ya I didn't have great experience with the PW Flex system with 580s...I think the RPs are a better solution anyway.


Jan 30, 2012 at 08:44 PM
masaookano
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · wireless trigger question


I second Spencer's recommendation to go with RP's.

- Masao



Jan 31, 2012 at 12:03 AM
RichardLavigne
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · wireless trigger question


Radiopoppers all day and night...


Jan 31, 2012 at 12:05 AM
Long Quang
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · wireless trigger question


Try pixel king. It does HSS & ETTL.


Jan 31, 2012 at 02:42 AM
gpop
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · wireless trigger question


Long Quang wrote:
Try pixel king. It does HSS & ETTL.


not especially well, I'm afraid.




Jan 31, 2012 at 03:00 AM
dan7768s
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · wireless trigger question


PocketWizard mini/flex does hss, eTTL, manual and if you add an AC3 controller you can set manual level/eTTL ratio by group from the camera. For HSS mini/flex squeeze mores light out of the flashes than Canon does with its wireless by light does.


Jan 31, 2012 at 09:55 PM
nomadicalloy
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · wireless trigger question


gpop wrote:
not especially well, I'm afraid.



I don't have any issues with pixel king triggers. Any specific problem with your triggers?



Feb 02, 2012 at 12:46 AM
vawill84
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · wireless trigger question


i need to research these pixel kings more myself, the QC might be a bit off, I see alot of varying opinions on them.


Feb 02, 2012 at 12:50 AM
jprezant
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · wireless trigger question


just to clarify something here...

You're talking about RadioPopper PXs, not the JRXs.



Feb 02, 2012 at 02:01 AM
Troy Carter
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · wireless trigger question


I tried both the PX and JRx system right when they came out and strongly prefer the JRx and setting the power through the transmitter to the full ETTL of the PX's. Plus, changing the power settings to the slaves on the PX was a PITA on the fly.


Feb 02, 2012 at 09:16 AM
deepbluejh
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #16 · wireless trigger question


The JRX will allow you to manually adjust power from the camera, but won't let you use HSS. I used these triggers for about a year and they were an absolute nightmare for me. I've since gone back to fully manual triggers and am very happy.

The PX (and other China clones) are about your only option. The PX system is very expensive while the generic clones probably aren't very good.

Unfortunately this is a relatively immature technology and there just aren't any great options at this point.



Feb 02, 2012 at 10:13 AM
Dave_EP
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · wireless trigger question


I've had lots of success with the Pocket Wizard and AC3 controller. All flash groups in manual (or ETTL) controlled from the manual dials (not menus!) on the top of your camera.




Feb 02, 2012 at 10:19 AM
MBMK
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · wireless trigger question


Radiopopper JrX! It's one of the simplest design ever. All the knobs are on top so you don't have to go through menu to adjust. You just dial the knob on the side to adjust power.

Oh and I also use Pixel King and it works fine for me also.



Feb 02, 2012 at 10:23 AM
lisy78
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · wireless trigger question


Do you need HSS for > 1/250 action stopping or are you just trying to use a wider aperture?

You're kind of in a shitty situation if you ask me.

Given that you want HSS you are pretty much limited to: PW Flex and RP PX.

Flex, with AC3 would give you easy power control from the camera (I assume WITH HSS though I've never looked into that particular aspect) but as you've read it's shite on Canon.

RP PX does work reliably (from what I've read... my experience with RP has been only with JRx... and I'm not using them anymore...) with Canon but it does NOT give you EASY power control from the camera. I mean yeah you can change the power settings in manual but you have to do so through the ridiculously clumsy 580EX2 interface.

PX requires you to have an additional flash on board... so to have one flash working with PX you need TWO flashes.

...

Now, IF you want HSS because you want to be able to use wider apertures, there IS a solution you might end up preferring to the PX solution... and the price isn't bad either.

To compare...

PX solution:

2x Canon 580Ex2: $900
RP PX Transmitter: $250
RP PX Receiver: $250
Total: $1400

Einstein Solution:

1x Einstein 640: $500
1x Vagabond mini: $240
1x Cybercommander: $180
1x Cybersync receiver for Einsteins: $30
1x 0.9 ND Filter: $60 (Hoya Pro 1) to $175 (B+W Multicoated)

Total : $1010 to $1125 (depending on which filter you go with)

This solution would give you A LOT more power and flexibility if your goal is to shoot manual flash with wide apertures. The ND 0.9 filter would obviously give you three stops of additional aperture flexibility, and would be equivalent to having a Sync speed of 1/2000 (assuming 1/250 native).

Ciao!

Alessandro

P.S. Note also that since you're a pro you're going to want backups to some of those things... the economics work even better for the Einstein solution once you decide you want backups... you can get a cybercommander + receiver for LESS than the cost of just a transmitter or receiver on the PX system. The flash is about $50 more on the einstein side but it's a MUCH more powerful flash. You also have the option to carry the cybercommander on a lanyard or in a pouch and use the smaller, cheaper Cybersync CST transmitter (you would set power levels with the cybercommander, then use the CST on the camera to fire).

P.P.S. Things get even better on the Einstein side if you want the ability to shoot multiple cameras (be it in a situation where you have a 2nd shooter or because you want to quickly switch FL and use primes)... To equip a second body to shoot your PX equipped softbox you need another PX transmitter AND another 580Ex2: $700!!!! on the Einstein side, you just need a Cybersync CST: $60 Also the Einstein can be plugged in in studio situations giving you ENORMOUSLY FASTER recycle time compared to the 580EX2 solution, you can have a modeling light... I mean seriously ... do I have to go on or did you order your shit already

ha ha ha

Oh yeah I don't work for the company, NOR do I own the Einstein stuff... waiting for 2 more wedding bookings and then pulling the trigger.

Edited on Feb 02, 2012 at 10:58 AM · View previous versions



Feb 02, 2012 at 10:49 AM
lisy78
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · wireless trigger question


Mohaimen Kazi wrote:
Radiopopper JrX! It's one of the simplest design ever. All the knobs are on top so you don't have to go through menu to adjust. You just dial the knob on the side to adjust power.

Oh and I also use Pixel King and it works fine for me also.


Radiopooper JrX does not have HSS (or reliability, some would say)



Feb 02, 2012 at 10:49 AM
       2       end




FM Forums | Wedding Photographer | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account