This topic is in the 2011 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 201135 mm for Leica M
p.3 #135 mm for Leica M
Thanks for the exposition, Luka. Instructive, especially as it is counter to my own subjective (and modest) judgment of the two lenses in use. No need to tone down your style of description, it's on the pleasant side of provocative 
Dec 09, 2011 at 05:06 PM
p.3 #235 mm for Leica M
Luka personally I'd be mighty interested on your thoughts on the other ZM lenses in the same vain as this discussion. if you dont feel it belongs here maybe it would warrant it's own thread as there is a lot to learn here.
or, if you dont mind, you could do a little tier list where you could group "superior", "acceptable" and "inferior" lenses together with the understanding that these labels applied only to stopped down infinity performance.
or, if you dont mind, you could do a little tier list where you could group "superior", "acceptable" and "inferior" lenses together with the understanding that these labels applied only to stopped down infinity performance.
Dec 09, 2011 at 06:26 PM