This topic is in the 2011 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2011Alt Flowers
p.25 #1Alt Flowers
Contax N 70-200mm at [email protected] on 5D2 iso 1000 1/1000s
 |
||
| http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5326/7069813317_f444a2a67e_b.jpg | ||
|
Apr 11, 2012 at 11:07 PM
p.25 #2Alt Flowers
Contax N 70-200mm at [email protected] on 5D2 iso 200 1/500s
|
||
| http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5115/6923779342_c3f5534a24_b.jpg | ||
|
Apr 11, 2012 at 11:36 PM
p.25 #3Alt Flowers
contas wrote:
@Bif: this is landscape flower and it's spectacular nice.
Thanks Contras!!!
Here's another tho much closer to home:
Zeiss_Planar_50mm_f1.4
@Bif: this is landscape flower and it's spectacular nice.
Thanks Contras!!!
Here's another tho much closer to home:
Zeiss_Planar_50mm_f1.4
Apr 12, 2012 at 04:35 AM
p.25 #4Alt Flowers
Contax N 70-200mm at [email protected] on 5D2 iso 200 1/2000s
|
||
| http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7080/7072473651_a5a49d6177_b.jpg | ||
|
Apr 12, 2012 at 08:08 PM
p.25 #5Alt Flowers
Fujifilm X Pro 1 and Fujinon 35mm f1.4 R
|
||
 Dogwoods by Clovermead Photography, on Flickr |
||
|
Apr 12, 2012 at 08:48 PM
p.25 #8Alt Flowers
Thanks jotdeh. The CZJ 135 deserves its reputation for doing flowers. But they do need to be large flowers (or large clump), the magnification / min focus distance is not very impressive.
Apr 13, 2012 at 11:40 AM
p.25 #9Alt Flowers
Nex 3 with Leica 90mm Summicron
Nex 3 with Leica Summicron 90mm f2 Snapdragon 5 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Nex 3 with Leica Summicron 90mm f2 Snapdragon 3 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Nex 3 with Leica Summicron 90mm f2 snap dragon 2 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Nex 3 with Leica Summicron 90mm f2 Purple Lilac by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Nex 3 with Leica Summicron 90mm f2 Snapdragon 5 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Nex 3 with Leica Summicron 90mm f2 Snapdragon 3 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Nex 3 with Leica Summicron 90mm f2 snap dragon 2 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Nex 3 with Leica Summicron 90mm f2 Purple Lilac by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Apr 15, 2012 at 01:00 PM
p.25 #11Alt Flowers
TeamSK jay wrote:
Thanks jotdeh. The CZJ 135 deserves its reputation for doing flowers. But they do need to be large flowers (or large clump), the magnification / min focus distance is not very impressive.
Have you used extension tubes with it?
Thanks jotdeh. The CZJ 135 deserves its reputation for doing flowers. But they do need to be large flowers (or large clump), the magnification / min focus distance is not very impressive.
Have you used extension tubes with it?
Apr 15, 2012 at 05:39 PM
p.25 #12Alt Flowers
Apo-Makro-Planar @4.0 on SD9 iso 100 1/6000s on Benro carbon tripod.
Lanscape flower
Edited on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:50 AM · View previous versions
Lanscape flower
|
||
| http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7138/7082988287_20d02ed4fc_b.jpg | ||
|
Edited on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:50 AM · View previous versions
Apr 15, 2012 at 11:57 PM
p.25 #13Alt Flowers
Apo-Makro-Planar @4.0 on SD9 iso 100 1/6000s on Benro carbon tripod.
Lanscape flower #2
Edited on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:50 AM · View previous versions
Lanscape flower #2
|
||
| http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7231/6936925710_a685417b4e_b.jpg | ||
|
Edited on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:50 AM · View previous versions
Apr 16, 2012 at 12:02 AM
p.25 #14Alt Flowers
Apo-Makro-Planar @4.0 on SD9 iso 100 1/6000s on Benro carbon tripod.
Lanscape flower #3
Edited on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:49 AM · View previous versions
Lanscape flower #3
|
||
| http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5455/7083020213_d73d033dd3_b.jpg | ||
|
Edited on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:49 AM · View previous versions
Apr 16, 2012 at 12:13 AM
p.25 #15Alt Flowers
Carl Zeiss T* on Foveon, Contax N 28-80mm, [email protected] on SD9 iso 100 1/750s Achromat +5, handheld.
Water-Lily with bees
Water-Lily with bees
|
||
| http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7043/6937196232_9cb6ba5832_b.jpg | ||
|
Apr 16, 2012 at 02:44 AM
p.25 #16Alt Flowers
Carl Zeiss T* on Foveon, Contax N 28-80mm, [email protected] on SD9 iso 100 1/180s Achromat +5 , handheld.
Edited on Apr 16, 2012 at 02:53 AM · View previous versions
|
||
| http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7132/7083288307_48ca389deb_b.jpg | ||
|
Edited on Apr 16, 2012 at 02:53 AM · View previous versions
Apr 16, 2012 at 02:50 AM
p.25 #17Alt Flowers
Carl Zeiss T* on Foveon, Contax N 28-80mm, [email protected] on SD9 iso 100 1/56s Achromat +5, handheld.
|
||
| http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5195/7083270909_bc25495bc1_b.jpg | ||
|
Apr 16, 2012 at 02:52 AM
p.25 #18Alt Flowers
Apo-Makro-Planar @4.0 on SD9 iso 100 1/1500s on Benro carbon tripod.
|
||
| http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5337/6940461386_9ba2d08bee_b.jpg | ||
|
Apr 17, 2012 at 12:47 AM
p.25 #19Alt Flowers
Hey contas,
I thought foveon was supposed to have much greater dynamic range? So my question is: Are those blown highlights in each of those shots due to the sensor or from processing?
(And no, I'm not intentionally trying to be a smartass. I'm really wondering.
)
I thought foveon was supposed to have much greater dynamic range? So my question is: Are those blown highlights in each of those shots due to the sensor or from processing?
(And no, I'm not intentionally trying to be a smartass. I'm really wondering.
) Apr 17, 2012 at 05:43 AM
p.25 #20Alt Flowers
Hi, I appreciate if you show which one first, really don't see
diferrent much.
diferrent much.
Apr 17, 2012 at 06:22 AM