Toothwalker wrote:
Wrong? No. I just wondered why you did not tackle this scene with HDR, which seems to be your usual approach for this type of subject matter.
That is true, I used to do a lot of HDR for urbex, but at some point I realised that I often liked the single shots better than the HDRs, so this time I didn't do any.
Toothwalker wrote:
Wrong? No. I just wondered why you did not tackle this scene with HDR, which seems to be your usual approach for this type of subject matter.
I think it works better not in HDR, sometimes it's what you don't see that make a picture rather than what you do
Toothwalker wrote:
Wrong? No. I just wondered why you did not tackle this scene with HDR, which seems to be your usual approach for this type of subject matter.
carstenw wrote:
That is true, I used to do a lot of HDR for urbex, but at some point I realised that I often liked the single shots better than the HDRs, so this time I didn't do any.
Ah, I should add that the processing dramatised the shot quite a bit. I wanted more dramatic lighting, high-key light in the background, more intensity in the front room. The plain shot is more... plain.
Manu -- Breathtaking view. Where is that exactly?
Toothwalker -- Nice shot of the salt bed.
Carsten -- Love your bw shot. To me, the slower shutter speed makes the shot - i.e. birds in motion.
Grenache -- You know I'm partial to CY 100/2 right? #1 is my favorite.
ebookman -- You seem to make any zoom shine including the Minolta 35-70 macro. Good stuff...
#1 is my favorite.