|
MDoc9523 Registered: Aug 13, 2006 Total Posts: 3292 Country: United States |
Thanks to everyone for the comments on the D600 and 16mm 3.5. Here is the second part of my first outing with the D600. This time I used the 300mm 4.5 EDIF. One extreme to the other
|
|
kwoodard Registered: Aug 04, 2012 Total Posts: 752 Country: United States |
MDoc9523 wrote: |
|
Reagan Registered: Jan 10, 2010 Total Posts: 2385 Country: United States |
Thanks Ray 35 and 85 at F4 |
|
Reagan Registered: Jan 10, 2010 Total Posts: 2385 Country: United States |
Leighton, sent you a PM |
|
leighton w Registered: Nov 12, 2010 Total Posts: 5986 Country: United States |
Ray, love the flower shot. Are you shooting raw? |
|
Oosty Registered: Mar 09, 2009 Total Posts: 3497 Country: South Africa |
MDoc9523 wrote: |
|
Ronny _Olsson Registered: Jun 24, 2012 Total Posts: 617 Country: Sweden |
Thanks |
|
Oosty Registered: Mar 09, 2009 Total Posts: 3497 Country: South Africa |
One from Tuesday and one from this afternoon! |
|
leighton w Registered: Nov 12, 2010 Total Posts: 5986 Country: United States |
Peter, the first one is just plain good. |
|
a.RodriguezPix Registered: Oct 31, 2011 Total Posts: 973 Country: United States |
kings_freak wrote: |
|
Ronny _Olsson Registered: Jun 24, 2012 Total Posts: 617 Country: Sweden |
leighton w wrote: |
|
Reagan Registered: Jan 10, 2010 Total Posts: 2385 Country: United States |
Ronny _Olsson wrote: |
|
CGrindahl Registered: Dec 17, 2004 Total Posts: 10219 Country: United States |
What I'm curious about Ray, is when did Leighton drive down to Florida? I see you caught him with the 300...
Definitely looking good Ray. I think that camera will take very good care of you, even as you take very good care of it. Pretty sweet images you've been posting. |
|
CGrindahl Registered: Dec 17, 2004 Total Posts: 10219 Country: United States |
My latest lens arrived this afternoon, the 24 f/2.8 N.C. AI'd. Although it came without a front cap and had some adhesive at two locations on the focusing ring, the lens is in pristine condition WITH the AI conversion kit. I easily got rid of the adhesive with an alcohol swab and then took a few photos. Here's one closeup, wide open. This lens has Close Range Correction. (CRC)
I thought this might be a good time to post a photo of my pre-AI lenses, all but one of which have been converted with the Nikon kits.
From left to right... 105 f/2.5 P AI'd, 105 f/2.5 P.C. AI'd, 85 f/1.8 H AI'd, 55 f/1.2 S.C. AI'd, 50 f/1.4 S.C., 50 f/1.4 S AI'd, 50 f/2 H.C. AI'd, 28 f/3.5 H AI'd, and 24 f/2.8 N.C. AI'd |
|
kwoodard Registered: Aug 04, 2012 Total Posts: 752 Country: United States |
I am SO glad you posted that image Curtis... I just inherited 4 lenses and only one has been AI converted. I got a 135mm f/2.8 AI'd, 35mm f/2.8, and two 50mm f/1.4. The 35mm and one of the 50's has the scalloped focus rings, the 135mm has a scalloped aperture ring, and the other 50mm is a Pre-AI. The scalloped 50mm has some scratches or gunk on the front element, I hope it comes off. I will take pics either tonight or Saturday. |
|
CGrindahl Registered: Dec 17, 2004 Total Posts: 10219 Country: United States |
Therein lies the rub Kevin... the few AI conversion kits available are for the more rare lenses. My hunt for pre-AI lenses was complicated by the fact I really only want lenses that have the kit already installed, because finding one can be very frustrating. Yes, the aperture ring on a pre-AI lens can be cut down so that I will mount on a modern Nikon DSLR but that solution is not nearly as elegant as installing an AI kit. Here's a closeup of four lenses, two of which in the middle are 50 f/1.4 lenses.
The one on the right is the older S version with the AI conversion kit. The one on the left is the later S.C. that has not been converted. Note that the rabbit ears of the converted lenses are reversed with screws above the ears. The pre-AI lens has rabbit ears with screws on the bottom near the rear of the lens. When the aperture ring is cut down, either the rabbit ears have to be removed, or they will be shaved on the bottom. Of course, you've received lenses as an inheritance. They'll work fine on film cameras and with appropriate adapters on alternative cameras. But to use them on your Nikon camera your only real solution is to have the aperture ring cut down. You can do it yourself, or you can hire someone to do it for you. There is a fellow who advertises on E-Bay and a number of folks have used John White to do the work. I believe he charges $30. The fellow on E-Bay charges a bit more but his price includes return shipping. I don't know whether that is the case for Mr. White. Here is a link to the E-Bay tech. He removes the rabbit ears and adds a second row of aperture number much like what is found on the AI converted aperture rings. It is that feature that makes his work attractive. John White either has no second row of numbers or he affixes a strip of paper with the numbers. I find that a rather inelegant solution. Good luck sorting it all out Kevin. AI Modification/Conversion of Nikon Nikkor Classic Lenses |
|
asiostygius Registered: Nov 29, 2011 Total Posts: 2100 Country: Brazil |
kings_freak wrote: |
|
asiostygius Registered: Nov 29, 2011 Total Posts: 2100 Country: Brazil |
kwoodard wrote: |
|
asiostygius Registered: Nov 29, 2011 Total Posts: 2100 Country: Brazil |
Oosty wrote: ![]() Peter, beautiful sea/landscape and gorgeous flower. |