|
johnahill Registered: Jan 08, 2006 Total Posts: 1437 Country: United Kingdom |
Hi All |
|
rsrsrs Registered: May 14, 2008 Total Posts: 591 Country: Germany |
i did go for the converted minolta 24/2,8 |
|
johnahill Registered: Jan 08, 2006 Total Posts: 1437 Country: United Kingdom |
I'm not too keen on a mirror shave. |
|
RustyBug Registered: Feb 02, 2009 Total Posts: 6521 Country: United States |
IIRC, it is not on of their SP lenses ... FWIW |
|
mMontag Registered: Dec 15, 2008 Total Posts: 1909 Country: United States |
For the $$ spent it's hard to beat the Oly - I have seen a big enough difference to say the MC & later version (without MC & H.Zuiko labels) it's just labeled Zuiko - with later serial numbers - are worth the extra effort to find. |
|
gasrocks Registered: May 23, 2005 Total Posts: 1616 Country: United States |
Nikon 24/2 or 24/2.8. I have a very nice Kiron 24/2 that I use. |
|
gcrimmins Registered: Sep 28, 2009 Total Posts: 126 Country: United States |
I love the sharpness and colors with my Olympus 28/2.8. I expect the 24 would be similar. I believe the 24/2 has a floating element, while the 2.8 doesn't. That may or may not make a difference to you. |
|
Steve Spencer Registered: Nov 08, 2006 Total Posts: 6145 Country: Canada |
I really like my Olympus OM 24 f/2.8. For the price I don't think you can go wrong with it. |