The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread
/forum/topic/839374/110

1       2       3              110      
111
       112              118       119       end

sculptormic
Registered: Feb 05, 2012
Total Posts: 434
Country: Netherlands

Met some rocks today.



This image is copyrighted by the owner




jamgolf
Registered: Nov 30, 2012
Total Posts: 45
Country: United States

After being inspired by the images, information and discussion in this thread I acquired a zf.2 35mm 1.4 and so far I am really enjoying it with my D800. It really produces beautiful images and I think as I improve my technique, it will be a source of great photographic enjoyment for me.

I have been using it mostly at f1.4 and I feel thats where the magic is with this lens (for me atleast).

Here are a few shots:

Backyard Hammock
Frontyard chair
My older son



sxgva
Registered: Apr 19, 2009
Total Posts: 96
Country: United States

two more shots with HFT



This image is copyrighted by the owner






This image is copyrighted by the owner




sxgva
Registered: Apr 19, 2009
Total Posts: 96
Country: United States

maybe a little sharpening was too much... let me play with it


carstenw wrote:
The dome in the second and fourth shots look fake: too perfect somehow!

.

.

.




R.Young
Registered: Jul 01, 2011
Total Posts: 698
Country: United Kingdom

I agree, very nice shots



carstenw
Registered: Dec 26, 2005
Total Posts: 12733
Country: Germany

I was just goofing around with the model/reality thing, not criticising the photo


sxgva wrote:
maybe a little sharpening was too much... let me play with it


carstenw wrote:
The dome in the second and fourth shots look fake: too perfect somehow!

.

.

.





sxgva
Registered: Apr 19, 2009
Total Posts: 96
Country: United States

The second and fourth shots were not the model but the real thing;
the first and third were models.

carstenw wrote:
I was just goofing around with the model/reality thing, not criticising the photo


sxgva wrote:
maybe a little sharpening was too much... let me play with it


carstenw wrote:
The dome in the second and fourth shots look fake: too perfect somehow!

.

.

.






carstenw
Registered: Dec 26, 2005
Total Posts: 12733
Country: Germany

Yes, I understand I was joking by saying that the real one looked fake, while not saying the same about the model.



sebboh
Registered: Nov 02, 2009
Total Posts: 7015
Country: United States

some christmas leftovers:

This image is copyrighted by the owner

^^ you can see the coating marks on the rear element of my lens in the bokeh balls in the upper lefthand corner.

some holiday animal cruelty:

This image is copyrighted by the owner



R.Young
Registered: Jul 01, 2011
Total Posts: 698
Country: United Kingdom

Love the look of these. Perfect examples of the 35.

How did you damage the rear element?



sebboh
Registered: Nov 02, 2009
Total Posts: 7015
Country: United States

R.Young wrote:
Love the look of these. Perfect examples of the 35.

How did you damage the rear element?


thanks, it was like that when i bought it. i believe the original owner (who occasionally posts here) got it in that condition as well, but i'm don't recall for sure.



sxgva
Registered: Apr 19, 2009
Total Posts: 96
Country: United States

Interesting. First time I've seen coating marks affecting image quality.
Is the onion effect from the coating marks as well?

sebboh wrote:

^^ you can see the coating marks on the rear element of my lens in the bokeh balls in the upper lefthand corner.




sebboh
Registered: Nov 02, 2009
Total Posts: 7015
Country: United States

sxgva wrote:
Interesting. First time I've seen coating marks affecting image quality.
Is the onion effect from the coating marks as well?

sebboh wrote:

^^ you can see the coating marks on the rear element of my lens in the bokeh balls in the upper lefthand corner.




the onion bokeh is due to the molded aspherical element. coating marks on the rear element will usually show up in bokeh balls, but marks on the front element will not.



R.Young
Registered: Jul 01, 2011
Total Posts: 698
Country: United Kingdom

I'll have to check my photos but the onion bokeh seems very pronounced as well as the shoe horn mark at the top of thr ring. What mark is on the rear element?



sebboh
Registered: Nov 02, 2009
Total Posts: 7015
Country: United States

R.Young wrote:
I'll have to check my photos but the onion bokeh seems very pronounced as well as the shoe horn mark at the top of thr ring. What mark is on the rear element?


they are two big scuffs next to each other near the center of the rear element radiating out. my processing (lots of added vignetting darkening the bokeh balls) has made them more obvious than the soc shots where they were very hard to see.



akul
Registered: May 30, 2010
Total Posts: 1354
Country: United States

First time to post on this wonderful thread.
ZF2 1.4/35


This image is copyrighted by the owner




mortyb
Registered: Feb 15, 2009
Total Posts: 1252
Country: Norway

C/Y 35/1.4 repost.



This image is copyrighted by the owner




Jabberwockt
Registered: Aug 22, 2011
Total Posts: 366
Country: United States

Glad I finally managed to get a decent copy of this lens. CY35/1.4

This image is copyrighted by the owner



Grenache
Registered: Dec 18, 2008
Total Posts: 1587
Country: United States

Cross post from Zeiss thread.
Jim

This image is copyrighted by the owner
Glory by Only_to_be_kind, on Flickr

This image is copyrighted by the owner
Blue Lagoon by Only_to_be_kind, on Flickr



uscmatt99
Registered: Jan 18, 2012
Total Posts: 211
Country: United States

A few from the ZF.2 35/1.4

From Sydney:

My lovely wife, f/1.4:


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Opera house, f/5.6:


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Botanical gardens, f/1.4:


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Kalamazoo Lights, f/1.4:


This image is copyrighted by the owner






This image is copyrighted by the owner




1       2       3              110      
111
       112              118       119       end