24-70 Finally.
/forum/topic/837905/0

end

Timm
Registered: Oct 05, 2002
Total Posts: 4390
Country: United States

After waiting for what seemed like forever for the 24-70 AF-S G to come back into stock, I took delivery in the middle of October. I've been wanting something to fill the gap between the 17-35 AF-S and the 70-200 AF-S VR, and it looks like this will do the job nicely. Now I have three f2.8 zooms, of three different generations. Should be fun comparing them.

I decided to celebrate with a nice Prime Rib steak, very rare:



This image is copyrighted by the owner




lisantica
Registered: Aug 23, 2004
Total Posts: 6303
Country: United States

I was reading a thread the other day about 3D effect. The vegetables in your shot sure look 3D on my monitor. Congrats on the lens purchase!

Lisa



gfiksel
Registered: Jan 15, 2003
Total Posts: 2813
Country: United States

Sorry, this is the most unappetizing steak shot I've ever seen



lamonica66
Registered: Apr 14, 2005
Total Posts: 1078
Country: United States

was gonna put mine up for sale to fund a 85 1.4.

I could'nt do it. It's just to good!

I will have to save to have both!

ps congrats....pass the beer



trenchmonkey
Registered: Oct 22, 2004
Total Posts: 28911
Country: United States

Yum! That's exactly what I did Timm...re: the 24-70



sandra pix
Registered: Mar 14, 2009
Total Posts: 63
Country: United States

Wow, you guys like it really rare - but yes, a great complimentary lens!



John Hanon
Registered: Apr 22, 2007
Total Posts: 1008
Country: Thailand

Can I have the steak, please



Timm
Registered: Oct 05, 2002
Total Posts: 4390
Country: United States

Thanks, all.

I've got to admit, it's been a long standing dream to have Nikkor Pro Zooms from 17-200mm. I got the 17-35 the first year it was out, the 70-200 VR in its second year of release, and now the 24-70. I'll never need to buy another lens! My NAS is cured! Oh, yeah, well maybe a 200-400 and a PCE or....

First impressions of the 24-70: I love the close focus, something the 70-200 sorely lacks. Flare and ghosting seem to be very well controlled--there are two SB800s aimed almost straight into the lens in that shot above. Neither the 17-35 nor the 70-200 would allow me to get the light this close to the lens axis without severe flare.

OTOH, I'm not thrilled by the fact that this lens is not parfocal. I can't zoom in to get critical focus and then zoom out for composition like I can with the other 2.8 zooms. Pretty minor gripe, I know, but $1800 empowers me to gripe about pretty minor things.


Sorry John, I already ate that unappetizing, nearly raw steak! Maybe I can convince the client that, regardless his opinion on the matter, that image really sucks and I'll have to shoot another one... and, of course, eat the subject.



end