In the end and on average, those people who are positive, who share (things, accolades, anything), and who consider others... or any combination of the above... nearly always live longer, enjoy happier lives, are better regarded by others, and make significantly more money.

Pity not everyone sees what a no-brainer that is.

jeremygrieff wrote:
Michael Sessio wrote:
I wonder if you can answer one questoin, how much time in post is typically spent used on images like these?

Cheers

You never answered Michael's question...and I am also curious as well.

Thank you!

Well first off, it depends on whether it is Fashion or Beauty. My retouch artist "Freddy Baby Paris" has sometimes spent up to one whole day on an image and one day can be 12 hours. It also depends on the manipulations requested by me and the intended outcome of the image.

Below is an example of an image that took 2 days because of the photo montage.

Very nice shots, amazing!

Your photography is edgy, interesting, and flawlessly executed. To echo an earlier post it is to your credit that you recognize the team worked to create your final image. I may be wrong, but I doubt seriously that the set, BG is entirely your idea. I would guess that there is considerable creative input from the magazine, and other participants. In other words there are several people, or entities that must be satisfied in order for the final product to convey what the magazine wants. I just love the end product, and wish I could work with you and your team.

farley wrote:
Your photography is edgy, interesting, and flawlessly executed. To echo an earlier post it is to your credit that you recognize the team worked to create your final image. I may be wrong, but I doubt seriously that the set, BG is entirely your idea. I would guess that there is considerable creative input from the magazine, and other participants. In other words there are several people, or entities that must be satisfied in order for the final product to convey what the magazine wants. I just love the end product, and wish I could work with you and your team.


Actually, the birth of an idea starts with seeking out themes or subject matter that would be an interesting seed to develop. I often commence this process with my retouch artist and partner. Once a list of idea's have been developed, there is a short list that eventually is presented to the magazine. Often, I will have an epiphany and just go with that idea if it is accepted by the magazine. Here is an example of the process.

http://www.benjaminkanarekblog.com/2009/08/07/writing-fashion-beauty-photo-shoot-themes/

jeremy_clay wrote:

You have a good point, but consider this - who is better to gauge how 'good' these shots are, the FM members who posted, or the editors of Vogue? I mean, if they print these, is that not the ultimate confirmation that the shots are, indeed, "good"?

Wasn't gauging, just expressing an opinion. I really liked some of the other images that he posted in this thread. Not sure I need to justify my comment since there is probably nothing that I can offer to him in the way that is constructive or helpful in his photographic endeavors. But if he wants, I'll be happy to explain my conclusion if the OP explains his reason for posting the image in the first place. Oh, and just because it was published in Vogue, does that mean there can be no critics? Come on man, get off the bandwagon.

finster1018 wrote:
jeremy_clay wrote:

You have a good point, but consider this - who is better to gauge how 'good' these shots are, the FM members who posted, or the editors of Vogue? I mean, if they print these, is that not the ultimate confirmation that the shots are, indeed, "good"?

Wasn't gauging, just expressing an opinion. I really liked some of the other images that he posted in this thread. Not sure I need to justify my comment since there is probably nothing that I can offer to him in the way that is constructive or helpful in his photographic endeavors. But if he wants, I'll be happy to explain my conclusion if the OP explains his reason for posting the image in the first place. Oh, and just because it was published in Vogue, does that mean there can be no critics? Come on man, get off the bandwagon.



I have been critiqued since the onset of my profession. I have no problem what so ever with constructive observations and opinions. It is a very healthy part of growing. But when I am asked to critique other photographers images, I rarely do for this reason:

http://www.benjaminkanarekblog.com/2009/06/20/commitment/

Ben

Hey Benjikan!
Nice work!
Ignore the flames! Sad to see it happening but I think FM is becoming Flame Miranda!
At any rate .... If you're ever in Hawaii, look me up, I'd love to intro you to our AD & Editors.

litepixels wrote:
Hey Benjikan!
Nice work!
Ignore the flames! Sad to see it happening but I think FM is becoming Flame Miranda!
At any rate .... If you're ever in Hawaii, look me up, I'd love to intro you to our AD & Editors.


Send me the Plane Tickets