|
T Bangerter Registered: Jan 01, 2007 Total Posts: 739 Country: United States |
Here is a recent family shoot that I did. ![]() 2 ![]() 3 ![]() 4 ![]() 5 ![]() 6 ![]() 7 ![]() 8 ![]() 9 ![]() |
|
BGP1 Registered: Oct 06, 2008 Total Posts: 731 Country: United States |
One thing I notice is they are all very tightly cropped. Shots like #3 where one of her feet is completely cut off...keep an eye out for that. I like #1 the best. |
|
sutegrat Registered: Jun 05, 2008 Total Posts: 210 Country: Canada |
I can't offer too much, but I don't like the feet being chopped off in #1, #3, #6, #8. #4 is a throw away... The baby looks over exposed in #3 |
|
jfinite Registered: Aug 18, 2007 Total Posts: 7066 Country: United States |
Nice shots. Light's a little harsh on 3, love 7. |
|
Carl Feather Registered: Oct 26, 2007 Total Posts: 558 Country: United States |
Try not to put the lady in front (5). It makes her look a lot bigger than the hubby, something most women don't want. |
|
Josh Evilsizor Registered: Sep 23, 2005 Total Posts: 2598 Country: United States |
try to be more consistent with your processing. |
|
capguy Registered: Nov 05, 2009 Total Posts: 65 Country: Finland |
Yeah you have some white balance issues, look for example at #1 vs. #3, then #7 vs. #8. Pictures #2, #4 and #6 can be improved with (a little bit) tighter crop. |
|
Jim Rickards Registered: Dec 02, 2003 Total Posts: 7953 Country: Canada |
Lots of good points already that I won't repeat. |
|
jhobgood Registered: Jan 04, 2005 Total Posts: 1826 Country: United States |
my first thought was that their eyes are dark in almost every shot. If you can not see the eyes you can not make as strong of an emotional connection. |
|
ESC in KC Registered: Dec 26, 2005 Total Posts: 2110 Country: United States |
7, 8, and 9 are my favorites. Agree that the light in a few is harsh. Just a little boost in the eyes in PP would help most of them. |
|
T Bangerter Registered: Jan 01, 2007 Total Posts: 739 Country: United States |
Thanks for your comments everyone |