Had a good shoot with a wonderful family. There 81/2 months twins were fun to shoot. They only had four accidents between the two of them.

1.

So cute! Love #1, 6, & 7. Have any with both of them looking at the camera together?

#1,#4 and #6 are great, #5 do not print at walmart or you could go to jail...
http://blogs.kansascity.com/crime_scene/2009/09/was-walmart-right-to-report-parents-for-kids-nude-photos.html

DLGPhotog wrote:
So cute! Love #1, 6, & 7. Have any with both of them looking at the camera together?

I got half a dozen or so with both babies looking at the camera. Not the easiest thing to do.

I would actually pull #5 down. As a parent, while I might want that picture for myself, I would not want it on line.

Cute pics! You did a great job.

I would definitely pull #5 from the world wide web.

Tim

I think they're all fine. As a parent I get a little exhausted by this overly paranoid society.

Wow, man. Fantastic set.

#3 for the win.

Michael Sessio wrote:
I think they're all fine. As a parent I get a little exhausted by this overly paranoid society.


lol, I would not want a photographer putting pictures of my infant childs vag out on the world wide web. If I decided on my own, that would be different.

Nice light, adorable kids...good luck with the rug cleaning

Josh Evilsizor wrote:
Michael Sessio wrote:
I think they're all fine. As a parent I get a little exhausted by this overly paranoid society.


lol, I would not want a photographer putting pictures of my infant childs vag out on the world wide web. If I decided on my own, that would be different.

You've got a point there. I always clear with a client any image sets that I might post. Have never posted a bare bottom. Or at least not a bare bottom of anyone under 21 years.

Michael Sessio wrote:
Josh Evilsizor wrote:
Michael Sessio wrote:
I think they're all fine. As a parent I get a little exhausted by this overly paranoid society.


lol, I would not want a photographer putting pictures of my infant childs vag out on the world wide web. If I decided on my own, that would be different.

You've got a point there. I always clear with a client any image sets that I might post. Have never posted a bare bottom. Or at least not a bare bottom of anyone under 21 years.



I did clear these photos with the client. As a father of three including acouple infants I really don't think twice about a naked babies bum.

It was a tad more than a bum...Personally I wouldn't have posted it, but whatever.

Let me say again, the shots are incredible. I've been looking at 6 & 7 for five minutes now...

bryanlindsey wrote:
It was a tad more than a bum...Personally I wouldn't have posted it, but whatever.

Let me say again, the shots are incredible. I've been looking at 6 & 7 for five minutes now...

agreed it was a bit more of a bum. 6 and 7 are two of my favorites the expressions are priceless

Good work on these. I agree with your comments on #3 - definitely odd, but interesting.
#6 is my choice.

they're all great but #6 is priceless

Bruce Sawle wrote:
Michael Sessio wrote:
Josh Evilsizor wrote:
Michael Sessio wrote:
I think they're all fine. As a parent I get a little exhausted by this overly paranoid society.


lol, I would not want a photographer putting pictures of my infant childs vag out on the world wide web. If I decided on my own, that would be different.

You've got a point there. I always clear with a client any image sets that I might post. Have never posted a bare bottom. Or at least not a bare bottom of anyone under 21 years.



I did clear these photos with the client. As a father of three including acouple infants I really don't think twice about a naked babies bum.

I'm not calling you out and if you got permission then I don't see any big deal. As a stay at home dad with two kids (three years and 13 months) images like this only arouse my instinct to grab a box of wipes.

Anyhoo, I almost forgot to mention, great work!