Leonid Shower 11/17
/forum/topic/832214/1

1  
2
   end

hobbes
Registered: Dec 06, 2003
Total Posts: 316
Country: United States

Did anyone capture any good shots from last night and would care to post your results?



jasoncallen
Registered: Feb 07, 2009
Total Posts: 2038
Country: United States

I was outside freezing my A** off with my lady friend until about 3, and we only saw a few brief ones (lots of light pollution in our area).

I'll post what I've got when I'm done tinkering with the shots in Photoshop. Nothing really stellar in the shots (I'm an astrophotography n00b), but the 2-3 dozen meteors that I saw (before the clouds rolled in) were pretty impressive! One or two of 'em were bright enough to cast shadows.



NightOwl Cat
Registered: Feb 19, 2007
Total Posts: 5093
Country: United States

We've got rain this week, so there's nothing to capture here. Figures..



Shutterslam
Registered: Mar 31, 2009
Total Posts: 495
Country: United States

I got skunked but a meetup group north of the city caught some action before the clouds rolled in around 2

Here's the time lapse I got from my balcony...had apply a perspective shift to 2300 frames to de-fish-ify the photo so the buildings look fatter than they should.

STARRY NIGHT

About 3 years back, I actually saw 3 fireballs streaking across the sky. No such luck this time, but it was still an interesting experiment with the new equipment.

For what it's worth...I set the intervalometer to capture 2550 frames...I got 2300 before the card filled up (16gb card at jpeg fine)...It didn't matter though because cloud cover at peak time killed the show.

other settings
jpeg fine
iso 1000
f5.6
5" exposures
wb set to 3200k
image review turned off
color controls set to neutral
intervalometer was set to ~830 intervals of 3 frames 17 seconds apart start at 2:00am and end 4 hours later

2 EN EL batteries were used in about 40 degree weather. The entire set drained one battery fully and left the 2nd at 20%.

Time lapse video compiled in Quicktime, exported as an mov, then encoded to flv for embedding in a flash player.



oobie
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Total Posts: 2666
Country: United States

Cool!

I guess it's one way to get that shutter count up to a respectable number.



lou f
Registered: Nov 18, 2005
Total Posts: 5036
Country: Ireland

still looks deadly, gona have to give that a whirl.



poisonpill
Registered: Apr 14, 2005
Total Posts: 1936
Country: United States

Shutterslam wrote:
I got skunked but a meetup group north of the city caught some action before the clouds rolled in around 2

Here's the time lapse I got from my balcony...had apply a perspective shift to 2300 frames to de-fish-ify the photo so the buildings look fatter than they should.

STARRY NIGHT

About 3 years back, I actually saw 3 fireballs streaking across the sky. No such luck this time, but it was still an interesting experiment with the new equipment.

For what it's worth...I set the intervalometer to capture 2550 frames...I got 2300 before the card filled up (16gb card at jpeg fine)...It didn't matter though because cloud cover at peak time killed the show.

other settings
jpeg fine
iso 1000
f5.6
5" exposures
wb set to 3200k
image review turned off
color controls set to neutral
intervalometer was set to ~830 intervals of 3 frames 17 seconds apart start at 2:00am and end 4 hours later

2 EN EL batteries were used in about 40 degree weather. The entire set drained one battery fully and left the 2nd at 20%.

Time lapse video compiled in Quicktime, exported as an mov, then encoded to flv for embedding in a flash player.




Wow great work and cool idea. I haven't played with intervalometer videos in years. Do you have any where you see streaks?



Shutterslam
Registered: Mar 31, 2009
Total Posts: 495
Country: United States

Sadly no. There are only 3 periods during the entire time lapse when a significant portion of the sky was clear enough to have seen any streaks, which amounted to about 800 or so frames.

I swear after studying each frame over 3 hours I'm sure I started to go a little loopy thinking cloud wisps were streaks. What it boils down to that, I didn't get any visible fireballs in the section of the sky I was covering, and the light pollution was heavy enough to kill any chance of seeing the typical meteor trails.

The problem I encountered was balancing the sensitivity of the sensor versus the ambient light levels. Too sensitive and it blew the exposures, too low an iso wouldn't be enough to capture anything but the brightest streak (figure the average streak lasts about a second)...so I settled around 1000iso.

I also knew there were clouds rolling in so there was far less motivation to find a good viewing spot knowing the show would be obscured around prime time.

As for the shutter count...yeah - that part was pretty painful, but hey, Leonids only come once a year right?



E-Vener
Registered: Jun 18, 2009
Total Posts: 4260
Country: United States

That is beautiful. One of the things I love about photography is how it can reveal what we cannot see with the naked eye.



1  
2
   end