|
SJC91 Registered: Aug 21, 2009 Total Posts: 43 Country: United States |
a cropped sensor awkward? Ive been shooting the F100 and I love it but the price of film and developing it, etc is just too high to justify. |
|
Avi B Registered: Dec 07, 2006 Total Posts: 6406 Country: Canada |
Used D2H or D200 should do you just fine. |
|
luminosity Registered: May 03, 2009 Total Posts: 3797 Country: United States |
D100? I'd avoid it if i were you. A D70s/50 would be a better way to go. Even a D1x or D2h would likewise be better. |
|
SJC91 Registered: Aug 21, 2009 Total Posts: 43 Country: United States |
A D70s seems reasonable...this just sucks Im going to Europe in less than a month and theres no way I'm going to deal with film over there...then paying to have it all developed ughh |
|
Doug Weasner Registered: Oct 24, 2007 Total Posts: 221 Country: United States |
You take a sizable hit on the viewfinder. My F4's viewfinder is HUGE compared to my D90's. That's the only thing I really find compelling about shooting with my F4 over my D90, although I started on digital. |
|
phatnev Registered: Nov 04, 2005 Total Posts: 1491 Country: United States |
35mm -> DX |
|
SJC91 Registered: Aug 21, 2009 Total Posts: 43 Country: United States |
Honestly...thats the BIGGEST thing Im worried about...the viewfinder...after messing with a friends Rebel the viewfinder just left me...disgusted! haha |
|
Two23 Registered: Oct 28, 2009 Total Posts: 2358 Country: United States |
Get a used D200, or even D80. The viewfinders are decent. I had zero trouble going from F100 to D80 a few years ago. It's not that hard. |
|
90 5.0 Registered: Jul 08, 2008 Total Posts: 1526 Country: United States |
Two23 wrote: |
|
Kittyk Registered: Apr 29, 2009 Total Posts: 3825 Country: Germany |
d200 and viewfinder magnifier should do the trick |
|
SJC91 Registered: Aug 21, 2009 Total Posts: 43 Country: United States |
Viewfinder magnifier? Do tell |
|
rhyder Registered: Jul 10, 2004 Total Posts: 3560 Country: United States |
D200 at the minimum. |
|
SJC91 Registered: Aug 21, 2009 Total Posts: 43 Country: United States |
God I want a D700... |
|
Len Shepherd Registered: Jun 15, 2009 Total Posts: 253 Country: United Kingdom |
When I first went part digital I got a D200. It is only marginally larger than an F100 and about the same size as an F6. It took me all of 5 minutes to get used to the handling - all 3 are in most ways similar. |
|
SJC91 Registered: Aug 21, 2009 Total Posts: 43 Country: United States |
Its just the cost of the film overall thats really hitting me hard. Digital just seems so much more convenient. |
|
panos.v Registered: Dec 15, 2005 Total Posts: 3919 Country: United Kingdom |
Get a D2H. It is cheap and fast, the viewfinder is as good as it gets for DX, smaller than the F100 but it won't kill you. As for the focal length/DOF issues, after a few shots and a couple of lens changes you won't even notice. |
|
mortyb Registered: Feb 15, 2009 Total Posts: 631 Country: Norway |
I'd say a D200 is pretty good value for money. The viewfinder is good - you'll get used to the size difference in no time. Even though I have a D700, I use the D200 with equal joy. It's a great DX-camera. IMO. |
|
Awasos23 Registered: Dec 17, 2008 Total Posts: 668 Country: United States |
I've used the D200 and its not bad compared to my D300 or my F100. I truly don't notice it until I go to frame a scene, and grab the wrong prime lens. |
|
luminosity Registered: May 03, 2009 Total Posts: 3797 Country: United States |
The 35/1.8 has been a bit of an equalizer for focal length equivalence. |