Low light wildlife photography
/forum/topic/831733/0

end

DavidHall
Registered: Mar 07, 2004
Total Posts: 609
Country: United States

If I want to shoot wildlife in low light, what is my best lens option? I have a 70-200 2.8. It has been recommended that I get an 85mm 1.2, but I think that is most often mentioned as a portrait lens. And, since it is almost $2,000 I don't want to be wrong. Any thoughts? Thanks



Tim Kuhn
Registered: Nov 29, 2006
Total Posts: 31125
Country: United States

300/2.8 L IS is what I lust for. I don't know anybody that has used that lens that hasn't absolutely loved it.

Tim



martines34
Registered: Jun 23, 2008
Total Posts: 2151
Country: United States

You might want to try a 135 mm - f 2 but then I don't know what camera body you are using.



Thomas Sanders
Registered: Aug 17, 2008
Total Posts: 11085
Country: United States

Tim Kuhn wrote:
300/2.8 L IS is what I lust for. I don't know anybody that has used that lens that hasn't absolutely loved it.

Tim


+1

Tom



bht-kevin
Registered: Apr 30, 2005
Total Posts: 212
Country: United States

300/2.8 IS is my dream lens. How low-light and how long are your shots?



CarlG
Registered: Mar 12, 2002
Total Posts: 5526
Country: United States

Reach is a major consideration, too. Not sure why you are looking to an 85 1.2 and 70-200 for wildlife? Even the 300 2.8 may be a bit on the short side, depending upon what you are shooting.

You also fail to mention the type of wildlife you want to shoot in low light. While a 2.8 lens is the best option, the longer lenses (500 & 600) tend to be f/4's. All well and good if you have a body that can handle higher ISO's with minimal noise. Then you would need to consider a solid tripod and head that can handle the weight of the longer telephotos. You can handhold these longer lenses in good light but real low light is tough.

Too many variables for a blanket answer, I would think.



Martin Good
Registered: Mar 16, 2008
Total Posts: 19298
Country: Switzerland

I am lucky to have a 300 2.8 and a 500 F4. I recall last winter here in Geneva where and when the light was low I used the 300 almost exclusively unless on real good sunny days which were few and far between. Distance to the subject is quite important though and you got to get close with the 300. A lot depends on your subjects too and their size and whether they are moving fast like small birds seem to be always doing or a bigger animal like a deer which may stay stationary for a few moments and let you get the shot and which you can fill the frame from a longer distance.
Martin



Slinky Pickle
Registered: Nov 30, 2008
Total Posts: 41
Country: Canada

If you have a crane to carry it around you could try this one. You could use that same crane to carry your wallet too

http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3349&navigator=3



end