|
yukisani Registered: Apr 06, 2009 Total Posts: 266 Country: Spain |
I have decided that I "need" a 1.2 or 1.4 L glass lens! I can only but one at the moment. Which should I buy? Please help me decide. |
|
Saad Syed Registered: Jan 24, 2007 Total Posts: 2914 Country: United States |
What you will see is that everyone has their own preferences and that all three lenses are EPIC. You can't really go wrong with any of them. The best answer is that you should rent each and see what fits your shooting style best. |
|
Tony Schreiber Registered: May 14, 2005 Total Posts: 3861 Country: United States |
If you can only get one of those three, I'd go for the 35. |
|
dgenx24 Registered: Jan 30, 2008 Total Posts: 492 Country: United States |
you answered your own question... get 35L!! |
|
Mr. Malik Registered: Sep 13, 2009 Total Posts: 1293 Country: Canada |
My vote is for the 35L |
|
BrianO Registered: Aug 21, 2008 Total Posts: 6660 Country: United States |
yukisani wrote: ...I like the 85 1.2 but the slow focus and shallow dof seem to hadicap it in a fast moving wedding. |
|
yukisani Registered: Apr 06, 2009 Total Posts: 266 Country: Spain |
They donīt rent where I live! |
|
j_son Registered: Nov 01, 2009 Total Posts: 62 Country: Canada |
35L for sure. You already have the 85 1.8 which is already quite good. 50L is not something I would consider, I'd go 35L, 135L, 85L (in that order). |
|
Sam Hassas Registered: Jul 11, 2007 Total Posts: 6044 Country: United States |
Tony Schreiber wrote: |
|
kirstin Registered: Oct 06, 2003 Total Posts: 1489 Country: United Kingdom |
(85L II focusing isn't so slow) |
|
Tony Schreiber Registered: May 14, 2005 Total Posts: 3861 Country: United States |
Sam Hassas wrote: |
|
Tony Hoffer Registered: Mar 14, 2008 Total Posts: 7496 Country: United States |
Sam Hassas wrote: |
|
Mr. Malik Registered: Sep 13, 2009 Total Posts: 1293 Country: Canada |
Tony Hoffer wrote: |
|
PatFurey89 Registered: Jul 11, 2008 Total Posts: 1361 Country: United States |
35L is still my bread and butter lens for everything from weddings to male erotica*. |
|
Aberdeen Photo Registered: Mar 10, 2006 Total Posts: 3812 Country: United States |
35L is always a good answer... |
|
Sam Hassas Registered: Jul 11, 2007 Total Posts: 6044 Country: United States |
50L is fast. I know not what you noobs speak of. It's equally as fast as the 24L. I don't own a 35L so I can't speak on it. I will say however that I have the focus assist on most of the day. Suck a great tool. |
|
Aberdeen Photo Registered: Mar 10, 2006 Total Posts: 3812 Country: United States |
Suck a great tool. |
|
Victor S Registered: Oct 12, 2006 Total Posts: 891 Country: United States |
Buy Sigma 50mm 1.4, more than half the price, super fast, super sharp! With all the extra money left save for the 24 1.4. In my Canon days I had the 24 and it was fantastic! |
|
Quan Registered: Apr 26, 2007 Total Posts: 1991 Country: United States |
35 doode. |
|
melvinho Registered: Sep 30, 2008 Total Posts: 101 Country: Singapore |
35L without a doubt! |