|
jamesf99 Registered: Oct 09, 2004 Total Posts: 6899 Country: United States |
DavidP wrote: |
|
jamesf99 Registered: Oct 09, 2004 Total Posts: 6899 Country: United States |
PetKal wrote: |
|
Kevin Sherman Registered: Nov 12, 2006 Total Posts: 1036 Country: United States |
jamesf99 wrote: |
|
LynnP Registered: Aug 28, 2008 Total Posts: 429 Country: United States |
Yes, why no master thread for the 1Dmark IV? There was a thread about the 5D MarkII, and people were complaining about it, a year before Canon even announced it. |
|
Daan B Registered: Aug 16, 2007 Total Posts: 7157 Country: Netherlands |
LynnP wrote: |
|
Pixel Perfect Registered: Aug 16, 2004 Total Posts: 15941 Country: Australia |
They are too busy whining about the 7D and have forgotten about the 1D IV. Maybe it's better we don't have a sticky, it'll just get bogged down in crap. |
|
David Manning Registered: Jul 10, 2008 Total Posts: 1144 Country: United States |
Daan B wrote: |
|
wtlloyd Registered: Jun 08, 2003 Total Posts: 3045 Country: United States |
PetKal wrote: |
|
Kevin Sherman Registered: Nov 12, 2006 Total Posts: 1036 Country: United States |
wtlloyd wrote: |
|
David Manning Registered: Jul 10, 2008 Total Posts: 1144 Country: United States |
I emailed Chuck Westfall at Canon this morning. His response is below. |
|
craigy Registered: May 05, 2006 Total Posts: 229 Country: United Kingdom |
I've had a couple on months break from FM - weather actually been good in the UK so I was out taking pictures. Went to Canon USA site to update DPP last night and saw the 1D4 specs for the first time. I went straight to FM, expecting a frenzy of threads and there were none. |
|
globalkiwi Registered: Jul 02, 2008 Total Posts: 2240 Country: United States |
Actually, I think the real reason is simply that no-one has one yet & very few sample images are available. There was a flurry of interest when the specs were published but I think most people are waiting to gauge the camera's real-world performance. Not much point starting threads until there's something to fill them with (though, yes, I know, that hasn't always stopped us in the past |
|
sskoutas Registered: Feb 15, 2006 Total Posts: 3154 Country: United States |
I think Craig makes good points, but from my perspective, my only real interest in the Mk IV is my hope that it will push the III's and II's down in price. As much as I'd love to own one (a IV), it doesn't seem to be so much a Mark IV as it does a Mark III b. We'll see. |
|
David Manning Registered: Jul 10, 2008 Total Posts: 1144 Country: United States |
sskoutas wrote: |
|
Adam L Registered: Aug 15, 2008 Total Posts: 399 Country: Australia |
globalkiwi wrote: |
|
jerrykur Registered: Feb 15, 2005 Total Posts: 3777 Country: United States |
Adam L wrote: |
|
sskoutas Registered: Feb 15, 2006 Total Posts: 3154 Country: United States |
32067dlm wrote: |
|
sskoutas Registered: Feb 15, 2006 Total Posts: 3154 Country: United States |
jerrykur wrote: |
|
Fidelity Registered: Oct 25, 2009 Total Posts: 137 Country: United States |
I'm also curious why there isn't a 1D4 master thread. It obviously is the best DSLR ever produced. It is a MASSIVE upgrade over the 1D3 (60% rez improvement, herculean AF and tracking improvement, ISO improvement, etc. etc.). And thank God it is 1.3x instead of a rez-and-reach-castrated or overpriced FF. Nothing deserves a master thread as much as the 1D4. Now, if we could just find some way to channel the FF-head whiners about the 1.3x into a whiners thread, then the rest of us 1.3x-philes could have a good-old-time. |