|
rprouty Registered: Aug 10, 2002 Total Posts: 6303 Country: United States |
Is Capture 1 the best RAW conversion software? |
|
tomrock Registered: Dec 15, 2003 Total Posts: 1851 Country: United States |
No. |
|
WAYCOOL Registered: May 15, 2004 Total Posts: 1828 Country: United States |
Yes. |
|
Jeff Phillips Registered: Mar 04, 2007 Total Posts: 156 Country: United States |
Depends |
|
UCSB Registered: Jan 10, 2006 Total Posts: 4009 Country: United States |
They have a free 30 day demo. If you try the demo, make sure you try it in PRO mode. I think the problem for many people is not whether it is the best, but the fact that you need to buy the PRO version to get the most out of it. Compare it to your current processor. Depending on your workflow, it may be the best. It does a great job with my 5DII files, but is still have some problems with my 7D files (although they are doing the best conversions outside of DPP). |
|
Alan321 Registered: Nov 07, 2005 Total Posts: 8686 Country: Australia |
so the average answer = "depends" |
|
stiksandstones Registered: Oct 18, 2004 Total Posts: 2402 Country: United States |
It does process the best looking files...but for people that process a lot of files, the workflow is slower than molasses. |
|
J Andersen Registered: Apr 20, 2003 Total Posts: 995 Country: Denmark |
I downloaded the demo and the raw conversion is different from ACR so it's deffinately worth checking out and compare to you self |
|
Jeff Phillips Registered: Mar 04, 2007 Total Posts: 156 Country: United States |
I could not resist the temptation to be snarky. I will up my meds tomorrow. In my opinion Capture 1 generally does a better job of conversion. Especially if you are trying to recover shadow detail or have bright lights or specular highlights in the photo. However this is not true for every photo and I am not a fan of the interface. C1 v4 was a big improvement on the interface side from v3 but still a little clunky and not intuitative, at least for me. I also confess I never got the hang of sessions. I end up using Adobe Camera Raw for most shots and C1 for a select few. If it is a shot I really like I will try both conversions... That is a longer explaniation than depends but the answer is still depends... |
|
Emile Gregoire Registered: Sep 09, 2004 Total Posts: 2387 Country: Belgium |
Jeff Phillips wrote: |
|
matthewbmedia Registered: Nov 30, 2008 Total Posts: 816 Country: United States |
I would use it if I was a food or advertising photographer. |
|
frankie Registered: May 10, 2003 Total Posts: 527 Country: United Kingdom |
capture one V5 is the best and it has editing key wording. FANTASTIC. images for my D3 come out so much better than lightroom and ACR could ever do. |
|
Bill C Registered: Jun 11, 2004 Total Posts: 85 Country: United States |
Well, like most things in life, the best tool for the job depends on the situation. I used to shoot Fuji Raw, now Nikon (D700), and I have several different converters ... PhotoShop ACR, Lightroom V2, Nikon NX2, DXO, and Capture One V5. For speed, I use LR, for handling high ISO in batches, I like DXO, and a toss up between NX2 and Capture One for overall best color. NX2 is the only converter that reads all of the raw settings (Picture Control) of the D700. I sometimes run pics thru NX2 and Capture One, then select which one I like best - so far it seems that I select Capture One for people shots, NX2 for everything else. Do I want to use all of these - absolutely not, and I have to spend time learning one or two really well. |
|
vince Registered: Mar 19, 2002 Total Posts: 306 Country: China |
rprouty wrote: |