Liza C&C
/forum/topic/831070/0

end

DWPhotos
Registered: Oct 25, 2009
Total Posts: 45
Country: United States

Hello All,
So I just had another photo shoot yesterday and would like to get some C&C's on my work. Thanks

1)
http://bighugelabs.com/onblack.php?id=4067242408&size=large&posted=1

2)
http://bighugelabs.com/onblack.php?id=4066485481&size=large&posted=1



Travis Harris
Registered: Oct 13, 2008
Total Posts: 1266
Country: United States

No one is responding? Maybe next time post the pics in the topic... : )

My first thought is that she looks fat in the first one. (The pose is not flattering her in that dress..) The light looks okay.. but it also looks very soft to me..

#2 is better, light is a little too hot on the forehead.. and again looks soft (for me). I would maybe work on #2 some more.. and use this as the keep shot for you.

- T



Jim Rickards
Registered: Dec 02, 2003
Total Posts: 8410
Country: Canada

Travis Harris wrote:
No one is responding? .....
- T

More people respond if they see a picture, compared to if they see a link. No rules on this, it's just the way things are.



Josh Evilsizor
Registered: Sep 23, 2005
Total Posts: 2650
Country: United States

check your WB... looks to have a little yellow cast



tdurnan
Registered: Jul 13, 2008
Total Posts: 1222
Country: Canada

Looks like the WB is a bit off and a little under exposed on my display.



h_2_o
Registered: Mar 09, 2008
Total Posts: 281
Country: United States

I have a simple question, why is it that most poses by females lately have them grabbing their high heel in the fashion of the first picture? not a complaint just a questions.



stevez32
Registered: Mar 26, 2003
Total Posts: 2184
Country: United States

First shot looks soft, was the focus on point?



Dave_E
Registered: Mar 02, 2005
Total Posts: 1627
Country: Canada

I like #2

Dave



alex.galang
Registered: Nov 02, 2009
Total Posts: 57
Country: United States

Missed the focus on the first otherwise would have been a nice shot. Might want to do some post work as well in regards to the blotchy skin on her legs.

Second one lighting is a little bit hot. Try to pay attention to your histogram on camera. You have a good looking subject. Try to get a reshoot, and pay more attention to the basics.

And remember the eyes is what connects your portraits to the viewer, meaning focus on the eyes.



ent2b
Registered: Nov 03, 2003
Total Posts: 4678
Country: United States

Jim Rickards wrote:
Travis Harris wrote:
No one is responding? .....
- T

More people respond if they see a picture, compared to if they see a link. No rules on this, it's just the way things are.


+2,353,694,353



jfinite
Registered: Aug 18, 2007
Total Posts: 7352
Country: United States

Pretty girl.
1 - Watch dress position, doesn't look good like this. Love the heels, maybe turn up the lights a notch. Could use some sharpening.
2 - Nice light, might be a little hot.



tonylovesmary
Registered: May 20, 2005
Total Posts: 1529
Country: United States

OK, so I expended the extra 1.47 calories of energy to click on your links, and here's what I think:

In the first one (and going along with h_2_o's comment), I have to wonder if "grabbing the heel" is the next big thing, replacing "girl on railroad tracks." It just seems awkward, and my own opinion is that you can see the awkwardness in her face. It doesn't look like she's doing it for fun. I do like the moody lighting, and the colors play nicely with her own coloring. Watch your focus -- her face looks soft.

Overall I like your choice of lighting and composition on the second one. That girl has very interesting brown eyes, and her own coloring complements itself. I know that's an odd comment, but it's true so there you go. The only issue here (again) is that her expression tells me she's feeling awkward or shy or something other than comfortable in front of the camera. Maybe that's just me, but it's what I see.



end