|
Me_XMan Registered: Nov 18, 2004 Total Posts: 2509 Country: United States |
Anyone getting this one at $4800? It seems like a good deal. |
|
PetKal Registered: Sep 06, 2007 Total Posts: 18530 Country: Canada |
One of my best ducking lenses. |
|
ezlyf Registered: Jun 24, 2009 Total Posts: 64 Country: United States |
Me_XMan wrote: |
|
godfather Registered: Aug 13, 2004 Total Posts: 1674 Country: United States |
Not too bad for price. I remember when everyone wanted the 200 to cost the same as the 300...well the USA version of the 300 is now $4700 which is pretty close to the 4800 that the 200 commands. I guess everyone got their wish |
|
omarlyn Registered: Feb 19, 2004 Total Posts: 3696 Country: United States |
godfather wrote: |
|
AGeoJO Registered: Jul 08, 2003 Total Posts: 10518 Country: United States |
I paid about that price for a used one, albeit a mint one, just a few months ago.... |
|
Me_XMan Registered: Nov 18, 2004 Total Posts: 2509 Country: United States |
With bing.com you can get another 2% off B&H. |
|
Sam tran Registered: Jan 10, 2007 Total Posts: 900 Country: United States |
One of my best ducking lenses - Petkal |
|
Paul Yi Registered: Dec 10, 2004 Total Posts: 4583 Country: United States |
I was at the B&H the other day, and the sales person there told me about it... |
|
kewlcanon Registered: Mar 28, 2009 Total Posts: 3162 Country: United States |
How much was it a year ago WITH Canon rebate ? |
|
PetKal Registered: Sep 06, 2007 Total Posts: 18530 Country: Canada |
Sam tran wrote: |
|
Will Patterson Registered: Nov 06, 2006 Total Posts: 4064 Country: United States |
Still way too rich for my blood |
|
Nick Nishizaka Registered: Nov 14, 2006 Total Posts: 1710 Country: United States |
Me_XMan wrote: |
|
Me_XMan Registered: Nov 18, 2004 Total Posts: 2509 Country: United States |
You just sold me. Gonna order one. |
|
Nick Nishizaka Registered: Nov 14, 2006 Total Posts: 1710 Country: United States |
Here's just a few pics from a stroll through the park last week... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Will Patterson Registered: Nov 06, 2006 Total Posts: 4064 Country: United States |
I cannot believe the price difference between the 2.8 and this version. Yikes. |
|
PetKal Registered: Sep 06, 2007 Total Posts: 18530 Country: Canada |
The lens is significantly easier to use than the 200 f/1.8. The IS and lower weight being the key factors there. In fact, it is so easy to use that even I can get some half-decent shots.... granted, of very simple targets. |
|
Sam tran Registered: Jan 10, 2007 Total Posts: 900 Country: United States |
Shoot! I hate myself for coming back and double sorry to take a peek at |
|
Me_XMan Registered: Nov 18, 2004 Total Posts: 2509 Country: United States |
You caught the squirel crossing the street! |
|
jhartman Registered: Jun 11, 2006 Total Posts: 311 Country: United States |
I paid $4800 last spring for mine with the then-current $500 rebate. Best people lens I own by a long shot, and that includes 135/2L, 85/L, 200/2.8L, 70-200/2.8L-IS, etc. Some portraits done this summer with it can be seen here and here. |