|
Guidenet Registered: Mar 23, 2008 Total Posts: 95 Country: United States |
Another vote for the Manfrotto, though I admit to not owning the others. It works fine with the D700 and my 300 f/2.8 with 1.7 extender. However, I do not use a ballhead woth it. I find it less stable and considerably heavier. I prefer Manfrotto's monopod head. I dont need the head to have a full range of motion in that the monopod itself provides that. Also, I find the tripod collar's ability to go verticle is faster and more stable than a ballhead in this situation. Moreover, a ballhead scares me in that it might flop and on a monopod could be dangerous, at least for me. ![]() |
|
Dennis Dietz Registered: Oct 23, 2007 Total Posts: 258 Country: United States |
While I agree that a long pod and a ball head are not necessary, they an be really useful. One trick I often use is to extend the pod pretty long, then either place is several feet in front of me and lean into it a little, I or place the foot between my legs and brace it against my knee. Both of these techniques for a pseudo 3-point setup and offer lots more stability. Obviously, since the pod is angled, you'll need some sort of head. I also find having the head adjustment cinched but not tight allows me to pan or tilt the camera/lens with enough resistance to still add stability. |
|
90 5.0 Registered: Jul 08, 2008 Total Posts: 1526 Country: United States |
ishootsports3 wrote: |
|
ishootsports3 Registered: Apr 09, 2009 Total Posts: 1522 Country: United States |
90 5.0 wrote: |
|
90 5.0 Registered: Jul 08, 2008 Total Posts: 1526 Country: United States |
ishootsports3 wrote: |