|
Breitling65 Registered: May 31, 2006 Total Posts: 4370 Country: United States |
Honestly I am not happy at all with 1.4tc performance on 500L, lot of light loss not as perfect AF, loss of contrast and chroma is very noticible in many cases. Much less keepers than without 1.4tc. Not even close to 300/F2.8L IS + 1.4tc results, on same apertures. I talked to PetKal already he is not using 1.4tc since AF speed loss.... |
|
Breitling65 Registered: May 31, 2006 Total Posts: 4370 Country: United States |
No one currently using 1.4tc on 500L/F4IS? |
|
Will Patterson Registered: Nov 06, 2006 Total Posts: 4064 Country: United States |
i know plenty of people use the combo, and I've seen great photos from it. Do you have the version II of the 1.4x? Also, once in a while I do hear about people sending them in to get looked at and they come back a lot better. |
|
Breitling65 Registered: May 31, 2006 Total Posts: 4370 Country: United States |
Will Patterson wrote: |
|
Adam L Registered: Aug 15, 2008 Total Posts: 399 Country: Australia |
Kenko 1.4 tc served me pretty well here with the 500 |
|
AGeoJO Registered: Jul 08, 2003 Total Posts: 10517 Country: United States |
Practically, I didn't see any loss in IQ when used in combo with this lens. The AF is just a tad slower but still very responsive. Optically, both versions are the same but version II has weather sealing. ![]() ![]() |
|
Paul Tessier Registered: Dec 27, 2005 Total Posts: 80 Country: United States |
I usually have to look at the image info on my 1dsIII to see if it was used or not the quality is so similar. Mine does take a different micro adjust than the strait 5 so you might want to look at that. Also I have herd of (no surprise) copy variations but, have been happy with the couple I've had. |
|
WakeTurbulence Registered: May 08, 2006 Total Posts: 210 Country: United States |
The 500 f/4L + Canon 1.4xII combo works great for me. AF is slightly slower, but not bad, and IQ is still excellent. |
|
Pixel Perfect Registered: Aug 16, 2004 Total Posts: 15941 Country: Australia |
Breitling65 wrote: ![]() ![]() I will have to dig up some 500 + 1.4x shots, don't have any at hand, but I have no troubles using it, all the superteles eat 1.4x for breakfast Here's a 500 + 2x + 1.4x shot of the moon on 40D ![]() and same shot with just 500 + 2x ![]() |
|
Ben Horne Registered: Jan 10, 2002 Total Posts: 10675 Country: United States |
Sounds like something is wrong with your setup. You should notice hardly a difference with the 1.4x. Stopping down a tad when using a TC also helps. |
|
AGeoJO Registered: Jul 08, 2003 Total Posts: 10517 Country: United States |
Yup, there is definitely something wrong with your setup. If your 500mm by itself generates great images then your TC is out of whack ![]() |
|
Will Patterson Registered: Nov 06, 2006 Total Posts: 4064 Country: United States |
Breitling65 wrote: |
|
Nello Milanese Registered: Sep 22, 2007 Total Posts: 7436 Country: Italy |
Here's 1 w the 500L + 1.4tc combo at 1/250s on a 40d. It is a killer combo..IQ is brilliant and the focus is still faster than the bare 1-400 IS lens ![]() |
|
lancemoreland Registered: Mar 27, 2004 Total Posts: 534 Country: United States |
Here is one with my 1.4 TC wide open. It is not as sharp as the 500L without an extender but is certainly acceptable.
Lance www.lancemoreland.com |
|
TooManyShots Registered: Oct 15, 2008 Total Posts: 455 Country: United States |
All with converter on and shot them with 1dmarkIII. |
|
mrogers Registered: Sep 28, 2004 Total Posts: 1263 Country: United States |
I'd like to see some action shots with and without the TC, I've personally have never been happy with my shots using a TC. Full stop less (f5.6), lets in half the light as f4 |
|
Breitling65 Registered: May 31, 2006 Total Posts: 4370 Country: United States |
mrogers wrote: |
|
Breitling65 Registered: May 31, 2006 Total Posts: 4370 Country: United States |
Pixel Perfect wrote: |
|
Breitling65 Registered: May 31, 2006 Total Posts: 4370 Country: United States |
Nello Milanese wrote: |