This woman is spectacular and real. My camera failed to enhance her beauty

Real or not real, is spectacular

thanks

I still think that she isn't real. A lot of surgery in this body

Well then, the surgery worked - they did a great job, my congratulations to the surgeons.

If she poses nude I want to be first to see (for medical reasons of course).....



Rags

Rags Hef wrote:
Well then, the surgery worked - they did a great job, my congratulations to the surgeons.

If she poses nude I want to be first to see (for medical reasons of course).....



Rags

Of course Rags, what else could it have been?

globalkiwi wrote:
jfinite wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
jfinite wrote:
They're spectacular, but are they real?

Not sure I care!

Seinfeld reference FTL

Yes, I know!

Okay- who remembers who the gal was?

Teri Hatcher?

She is Vanessa. Argentina Model

i like how the op has four different accounts posting in this thread and is creating strange dialogue about the model's breasts with them.

VPell wrote:
i like how the op has four different accounts posting in this thread and is creating strange dialogue about the model's breasts with them.

Very keen observation.......

Makes one wonder if he took the shot....



Rags

Mano Negra, saludos. Tengo una sugerencia, los ultimos dos posts tuyos me llevaron a una página que provocaron el que yo cerrara el browser y apagara la computadora para volver a empezar. Creo que las fotos que enseñas son buenas pero dada esa experiencia que tuve con tus vínculos, no he visitado este.
Es posible que sólo me esté pasando a mí ya que no leo de nadie más comentando acerca del tópico pero, sería posible que mostraras la foto en tu post en vez de mostrar un vínculo a esos sites?
Un abrazo,
respetuosamente
jd

Siento eso que te ocurre. No sabía de nadie que le pasara. He intentado subir las fotos y siempre me da fallo. En otros post alguien me hace el favor y lo hace por mi.

Lo siento.

Un abrazo

jfinite wrote:
Teri Hatcher?

Yup.

WTF, if you are going to post a link to your website instead of the picture, at least have the courtesy to make it a website where we are not swamped by popup ads. Even clicking on the picture causes more popups. Sorry to be rude, but I'm not sure why you posted the link - to show the picture and get feedback, or to get some ad revenue.

alphakappa wrote:
WTF, if you are going to post a link to your website instead of the picture, at least have the courtesy to make it a website where we are not swamped by popup ads. Even clicking on the picture causes more popups. Sorry to be rude, but I'm not sure why you posted the link - to show the picture and get feedback, or to get some ad revenue.


I use adblock+firefox's built-in pop up blocker, so I got no pop-ups.

That being said, this picture is relying on the model's looks alone. The picture is either soft or blurry. I can't tell which. The EXIF indicates 1/50 shutter speed with a 35mm lens which has a FoV equivalent to a 52mm lens. The shutter should be faster (you can at least bump the ISO to 200 to get 1/100). The picture is also either processed further with some sort of noise reduction software, blur or was uprezzed. I can't tell which.

Also, the color is odd. She's too orange. The lighting is uneven and it gets dark in the upper right hand corner, next to her blurred legs.

No hay problema hermano. Sigue fotografiando.

jd

now?

bigger is better. But I do not like the signature

I do not like the signature, too.

The light and the model perfect