|
TMR2 Registered: Sep 13, 2006 Total Posts: 413 Country: United States |
Here are a few from cross town rivals Washburn HS vs. North HS in Minneapolis a couple of weeks ago. The game was hard fought in the rain with Washburn pulling off the victory by kicking a field goal in the final 3 seconds. Excellent game. ![]() 2. ![]() 3. ![]() 4. ![]() 5. ![]() 6. ![]() 7. ![]() 8. ![]() 9. ![]() 10. ![]() 11. ![]() 12. ![]() 13. ![]() 14. ![]() 15. ![]() 16. ![]() 17. ![]() 18. ![]() 19. ![]() 20. ![]() |
|
DannWunderlich Registered: Oct 08, 2007 Total Posts: 2440 Country: United States |
Come on baby, let me see a tighter crop on these -- especially 1,8 and 16 -- those could be great shots with a little bit of work to them |
|
clarence3 Registered: Sep 28, 2008 Total Posts: 1853 Country: United States |
These look great. |
|
Stan Kozlowitz Registered: Feb 23, 2008 Total Posts: 2 Country: United States |
Excellent photos. You must be shooting at f/2.8. What camera? ISO? lens? Are you using flash? |
|
TMR2 Registered: Sep 13, 2006 Total Posts: 413 Country: United States |
Thanks for the comments guys. Good point on the crops. I'll try to tighten up some of these. |
|
Ted ellis Registered: Aug 08, 2007 Total Posts: 12060 Country: United States |
Travis, crops mentioned. You have captured some great action. If I may add, I know you didn't use a flash and the lighting was terrible but more exposure was needed IMO. Most of the faces are hidden. #3 & 16 have alot of promise. |
|
ponceii Registered: Sep 02, 2005 Total Posts: 58 Country: United States |
I'm going to be taking some photos tonight of a football game and plan on shooting @ ISO 3200 with the exposure compensation setted up by at least 1 using a Canon 1DMKII with 70-200mm 2.8 IS. I'm wondering it there will be an issue with me using a 100-400mm 4.5/5.6 lens underneath the lights since I haven't done so before. Also, please forgive me but what is LR? |
|
Rob001 Registered: Sep 07, 2008 Total Posts: 661 Country: Canada |
Yup, 4.5/5.6 won't work unless you're using flash. Football lighting is notoriously bad. I wouldn't even consider that 100-400. |
|
G. Todd Kalif Registered: Oct 17, 2006 Total Posts: 578 Country: United States |
Gimme 1, 5, 7, and 12. Tighten the crop, but these have action, the runner's face, and pretty good WB. Night HS football is so nasty, given hotspots, etc. I don't think most HS fields have lights that will allow good faces consistently without a flash (and its drawbacks). |
|
Scott Sewell Registered: Dec 08, 2003 Total Posts: 8254 Country: United States |
Travis, I won't mention the crops since several already have...woops, I just did. ![]() ![]() And here is at 1/320: ![]() IMO, it's obviously important to stop action, but if the faces under the helmets are nothing but dark blobs then you're really not accomplishing much. Like flash or not, that's really why people have to use it...to be able to actually the subjects in the image. ponceii wrote: I'm going to be taking some photos tonight of a football game and plan on shooting @ ISO 3200 with the exposure compensation setted up by at least 1 using a Canon 1DMKII with 70-200mm 2.8 IS. I'm wondering it there will be an issue with me using a 100-400mm 4.5/5.6 lens underneath the lights since I haven't done so before. Are you planning to shoot action or the players/cheerleaders just standing on the sideline? Not gonna capture action at night with a variable aperture lens unless you try to do some sort of panning or creative shots. f2.8 is often not enough, certainly not at many HS facilities. Good luck. |
|
SJMD Registered: Nov 13, 2004 Total Posts: 15180 Country: United States |
very nice overall - agree about the flash |