1,001 CAMERAS SEE IN GIGAPIXELS
/forum/topic/820068/0

end

yogi3939
Registered: Oct 19, 2005
Total Posts: 1188
Country: United States

1,001 CAMERAS SEE IN GIGAPIXELS

As manufacturers of consumer digital cameras compete in increments, adding one or two megapixels to their latest models, David Brady of Duke University is thinking much bigger. Working with the U.S. Department of Defense's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, he is designing and building a camera that could achieve resolutions 1,000 or even 1 million times greater than the technology on the market today.

The goal of reaching giga- or terapixels, says Brady, is currently being held back by the difficulty of designing a spherical lens that will not distort small areas of a scene. His idea is not only to modify the shape of the camera lens -- making it aspherical -- but to link together thousands of microcameras behind the main lens. Each of these cameras would have its own lens optimized for a small portion of the field of view.

"Now, when you use a camera, you're looking through a narrow soda straw," says Brady. "These new cameras will be able to capture the full view of human vision."

The final result of the three-year project should be a device about the size of a breadbox, though Brady hopes to scale the technology down to create a single-lens reflex camera with a resolution of 50 gigapixels. (Paper CWB2, "Multiscale Optical Systems" is at 2 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 14).

Here is the LINK to the page the article is on.



john_edwards
Registered: Jun 30, 2005
Total Posts: 1602
Country: United States

Rats, I'll be forced to leave XP for a bigger system.



yogi3939
Registered: Oct 19, 2005
Total Posts: 1188
Country: United States

Greg Hawkins wrote:
I have to be honest, there isn't that many things that i want to look at, with that much detail. I also did hear that canon is working on the digic 100 processor that will be able to process 1 frame per 15 seconds, and sandisc is working on a 1 TB card that will hold 4 photos per card.


I have to agree with you. You would have to have a really special need for a camera with 50 GIGApixel resolution. Not even professional shots for billboards need that much detail. And they would almost have to have multiple paralell processors to even be able to store the picture on a card in the most efficient compression system available. Never mind shooting in raw.

However, I can see this technology being developed for the next generation or two of deep space telescopes.



tptram
Registered: Sep 10, 2005
Total Posts: 347
Country: Canada

or military surveillance



ontime
Registered: Oct 27, 2005
Total Posts: 1980
Country: United States

This is like the nuclear bomb of the megapixel war.



firewireguy
Registered: Feb 20, 2006
Total Posts: 1347
Country: United Kingdom

You could just use a 10mm lens all the time and then crop to the equivilent of a 2000mm lens. It'd be a peado's dream! :P



Bifurcator
Registered: Oct 22, 2008
Total Posts: 6047
Country: Japan

yogi3939 wrote:
1,001 CAMERAS SEE IN GIGAPIXELS

As manufacturers of consumer digital cameras compete in increments, adding one or two megapixels to their latest models, David Brady of Duke University is thinking much bigger. Working with the U.S. Department of Defense's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, he is designing and building a camera that could achieve resolutions 1,000 or even 1 million times greater than the technology on the market today.

The goal of reaching giga- or terapixels, says Brady, is currently being held back by the difficulty of designing a spherical lens that will not distort small areas of a scene. His idea is not only to modify the shape of the camera lens -- making it aspherical -- but to link together thousands of microcameras behind the main lens. Each of these cameras would have its own lens optimized for a small portion of the field of view.

"Now, when you use a camera, you're looking through a narrow soda straw," says Brady. "These new cameras will be able to capture the full view of human vision."

The final result of the three-year project should be a device about the size of a breadbox, though Brady hopes to scale the technology down to create a single-lens reflex camera with a resolution of 50 gigapixels. (Paper CWB2, "Multiscale Optical Systems" is at 2 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 14).

Here is the LINK to the page the article is on.



That's not a new idea and it's already been constructed and used is astro-photography. I'll look for the site and link it when/if I find it again. About 4 years ago I was contracted to create a presentation video for it. There was one extremely large aspherical lens (I dunno the number of elements) over the sensor array and each sensor (I think they were CMOS) had it's own custom lens - again aspherical and I assume a multi element construction. If I remember right there were 800 24MPx sensors: MF Digital back chips used by some famous make, I forget.

Anyway these two sound about the same to me.




omarlyn
Registered: Feb 19, 2004
Total Posts: 3525
Country: United States

Bifurcator wrote:

That's not a new idea and it's already been constructed and used is astro-photography. I'll look for the site and link it when/if I find it again. About 4 years ago I was contracted to create a presentation video for it. There was one extremely large aspherical lens (I dunno the number of elements) over the sensor array and each sensor (I think they were CMOS) had it's own custom lens - again aspherical and I assume a multi element construction. If I remember right there were 800 24MPx sensors: MF Digital back chips used by some famous make, I forget.

Anyway these two sound about the same to me.



Do you mean this one: Pan-Starrs

Omar



jnphotography
Registered: Oct 29, 2009
Total Posts: 12
Country: United States

hahaha i was actually talking to my dad about making a camera that is the same as your eye ....wowwwwww



end