|
kakomu Registered: May 28, 2009 Total Posts: 3356 Country: United States |
dolina wrote: |
|
Will Patterson Registered: Nov 06, 2006 Total Posts: 4063 Country: United States |
BigStuart wrote: |
|
Alistair Watson Registered: Mar 21, 2005 Total Posts: 5848 Country: United Kingdom |
dolina wrote: |
|
Will Patterson Registered: Nov 06, 2006 Total Posts: 4063 Country: United States |
Why 6 PW's for 3 cameras |
|
kakomu Registered: May 28, 2009 Total Posts: 3356 Country: United States |
Will Patterson wrote: |
|
dolina Registered: Nov 05, 2008 Total Posts: 2800 Country: United States |
KIDERAL wrote: |
|
dolina Registered: Nov 05, 2008 Total Posts: 2800 Country: United States |
I was also wondering about the sheer number of PWs. Maybe there's another set of cameras on the other side or the extra 3 PWs are backups |
|
kakomu Registered: May 28, 2009 Total Posts: 3356 Country: United States |
dolina wrote: |
|
n0b0 Registered: Sep 22, 2008 Total Posts: 5062 Country: Australia |
Well the commentary in the video only mentioned setting up 3 cameras. That said, the collage showed that it's not just a single row pano stitch. |
|
cineski Registered: Oct 22, 2004 Total Posts: 3491 Country: United States |
The only inaccuracy I see in this video are the claims of 1 year spent planning and 3 weeks to set up. What? Anybody who'd versed in production can get this done with a few weeks of planning and a day or two of shooting with enough man power and budget. Looks like the self proclaimed genius with the horrible typing skills has been silenced? |
|
Jim Quinn Registered: Oct 22, 2004 Total Posts: 222 Country: United States |
Hey, why all the heavy breathing here? I opened the original post to find out more about how NatGeo rigged the cameras to shoot that cool tree promo. Instead the thread is full of posters bashing each other over details about the trees themselves, and worse. If there's more to say about the photos and the rigging and the problems of stitching 84 photos together, I'd love to read it. Otherwise, please, take a deep breath. |
|
runner301 Registered: Jul 02, 2005 Total Posts: 628 Country: Japan |
What i must say, without feeding the trolls, is that 20000 dollars of camera, 3 weeks of rigging, or was it planning, immeasurable hype all created an image that most of you saw in a resolution that was less than your first digital camera. |
|
lancemoreland Registered: Mar 27, 2004 Total Posts: 534 Country: United States |
KIDERAL wrote: |
|
KIDERAL Registered: Apr 12, 2004 Total Posts: 2189 Country: United States |
Lance..... you beat me by three weeks..... |
|
Vivek Registered: Jan 24, 2003 Total Posts: 2487 Country: United States |
lancemoreland wrote: |
|
thedigitalbean Registered: Jun 24, 2005 Total Posts: 5985 Country: United States |
<shrug> I'd rather read a silly song than the constant bitching, moaning and complaining that usually fills the threads on this board. But hey thats just me |
|
Gochugogi Registered: Jun 25, 2003 Total Posts: 7362 Country: United States |
Vivek wrote: |
|
skibum5 Registered: Jan 21, 2005 Total Posts: 10231 Country: United States |
dolina wrote: |
|
Mike Farren Registered: Aug 08, 2007 Total Posts: 578 Country: United Kingdom |
Yeah the vid seems to indicate that they were stitching dozens and dozens of pictures there. That is gonna be one HUGE file! |