|
sjms Registered: Mar 21, 2003 Total Posts: 14565 Country: United States |
adam613 wrote: |
|
sjms Registered: Mar 21, 2003 Total Posts: 14565 Country: United States |
Steezus wrote: |
|
Steezus Registered: Aug 01, 2009 Total Posts: 824 Country: United States |
sjms wrote:you see boggling i see opportunity and a systematic approach. |
|
sjms Registered: Mar 21, 2003 Total Posts: 14565 Country: United States |
? |
|
Savas K Registered: Feb 01, 2006 Total Posts: 3967 Country: United States |
Transformers? |
|
E-Vener Registered: Jun 18, 2009 Total Posts: 4260 Country: United States |
sjms wrote: |
|
sjms Registered: Mar 21, 2003 Total Posts: 14565 Country: United States |
you bet! they'd never get past the consumer products safety council today the way we had it. way too many little parts. |
|
sjms Registered: Mar 21, 2003 Total Posts: 14565 Country: United States |
adam613 wrote: ![]() Trent 500 ![]() on final EWR ![]() FedEx 611 EWR ![]() playing in the sim ![]() CFM56-7 ![]() the first commercial B757 with blended winglets ![]() |
|
Steezus Registered: Aug 01, 2009 Total Posts: 824 Country: United States |
sjms wrote: |
|
sjms Registered: Mar 21, 2003 Total Posts: 14565 Country: United States |
it seems your saracasm eluded more then me. in fact it still does. but then its pretty irrelevent. ![]() |
|
PPower Registered: Nov 25, 2008 Total Posts: 31 Country: United States |
Thanks for the review. In my looking around, I had missed this one. I've basically decided on getting the PC-44NS in red. If I may, let me add a little bit more information that I have gathered. First is that I can already see that the bubble levels are virtually useless as a circular level would have been better. I understand that it is difficult to view having to look underneath the side of your camera and still shows fore and aft level so much more clearly than lateral. |