|
HerbChong Registered: Dec 02, 2005 Total Posts: 7276 Country: United States |
taken at www.opus40.org. color IR done using the usual channel swapping to get somewhat realistic color in the sky. |
|
jmcfadden Registered: Oct 30, 2002 Total Posts: 30061 Country: United States |
the first is very nice tho i would bump the contrast a few notches to give definition to what looks too flat at present. |
|
Jammy Straub Registered: Jan 28, 2007 Total Posts: 6756 Country: United States |
Very interesting location, I rather like the first one best. Always have had a thing for landscapes with very little sky, like the paintings of Anselm Keifer. |
|
Makten Registered: Jul 14, 2008 Total Posts: 2892 Country: Sweden |
Nice, but why f/13? Diffraction starts much earlier for the IR waveband, so you'll lose alot of sharpness and contrast by stopping down that much. |
|
HerbChong Registered: Dec 02, 2005 Total Posts: 7276 Country: United States |
you haven't using very good sharpening filters. the best ones correct for diffraction. |
|
Makten Registered: Jul 14, 2008 Total Posts: 2892 Country: Sweden |
HerbChong wrote: |
|
HerbChong Registered: Dec 02, 2005 Total Posts: 7276 Country: United States |
yes, you can. you obviously haven't tried it or the math. it's not going to correct everything but a proper deconvolution sharpening filter knows what to do with diffraction if it knows the pixel pitch, crop factor, and f-stop. |
|
Avi B Registered: Dec 07, 2006 Total Posts: 6405 Country: Canada |
Hi Herb, I'm interested in the math for this. Do you have some references that I can check out? Are these blind deconvolution filters then? |