|
himcheong Registered: Mar 02, 2008 Total Posts: 137 Country: United Kingdom |
Hi guys |
|
nrferguson Registered: Apr 20, 2004 Total Posts: 849 Country: United Kingdom |
I bought a 5D Mk2 this spring to go with my 40D and have never regretted it. The 17-40L is a perfect match as a wide-angle which it never was on the 40D |
|
Ian.Dobinson Registered: Feb 18, 2007 Total Posts: 9093 Country: United Kingdom |
question is how much do you want a new body over keeping the 300/4? |
|
PetKal Registered: Sep 06, 2007 Total Posts: 18525 Country: Canada |
A couple of options which will give ya extra width without the expense of megasensor 5D MkII: |
|
skibum5 Registered: Jan 21, 2005 Total Posts: 10231 Country: United States |
himcheong wrote: |
|
molson Registered: Oct 30, 2002 Total Posts: 8134 Country: Canada |
The best bang for your buck would be to add an EF-S 10-22 to use with your 40D. |
|
Daan B Registered: Aug 16, 2007 Total Posts: 7157 Country: Netherlands |
molson wrote: |
|
tyreman Registered: Mar 15, 2008 Total Posts: 72 Country: Canada |
40D is a very Good camera. |
|
jrscls Registered: Sep 07, 2005 Total Posts: 1278 Country: United States |
5D MK II and the 24-105 will make a great travel kit. I would add a fast prime and if you want wider, get the 17-40 L. |
|
tmr_wa Registered: Sep 07, 2004 Total Posts: 1023 Country: United States |
I would hold on to the 40D if at all possible. It's nice to have a backup, and the 40D is a great camera. |
|
kewlcanon Registered: Mar 28, 2009 Total Posts: 3162 Country: United States |
Either add 17-40mm or 10-22mm. |
|
philber Registered: May 21, 2008 Total Posts: 5804 Country: France |
I upgraded from a 40D to a 5D MkII by selling a 300 f:4 IS... and a 100mm f:2.8. And never looked back, even though 40D was a camera I really liked. Better LCD, micro-adjust, high-ISO, full format, much better viewfinder, you have a lot of goodies waiting for you. |
|
Pixel Perfect Registered: Aug 16, 2004 Total Posts: 15941 Country: Australia |
Tokina 12-24, Canon 10-22 or Sigma 10-22 f/3.5 if you need much wider. But I'd also take a fast prime like a 50 f/1.4. |
|
hfillmore Registered: Dec 15, 2005 Total Posts: 1153 Country: United States |
a 10-22 will solve all your problems. Think of it this way: |
|
snooked123 Registered: Feb 12, 2006 Total Posts: 651 Country: United States |
40d + 10-22mm or 5d + 17-40mm. |
|
David Baldwin Registered: Jun 28, 2007 Total Posts: 2198 Country: United Kingdom |
You might want to consider a Tokina 12-24 for the 40D (a combination I know well). Cheap, sharp and very well built. |
|
abam Registered: Apr 25, 2005 Total Posts: 4201 Country: United States |
40D + 10-22. |
|
MountainTop Registered: Mar 27, 2008 Total Posts: 339 Country: United States |
<devil appears on shoulder and whispers into ear> |
|
Mirek Elsner Registered: Oct 03, 2005 Total Posts: 721 Country: United States |
my thought so far, is to sell my 40d and 300L to raise fund for the new full frame so that i get the true 35mm coverage and the better image quality what would you do? |