should i get a 5d mark II
/forum/topic/803122/0

1
   2   end

himcheong
Registered: Mar 02, 2008
Total Posts: 137
Country: United Kingdom

Hi guys
i am going away for france at late august, and i'm thinking is this a good time to get a 5D mark ii
for the trip?? or should i stay at what i have right now...?
I have a 40D, 24-105L, 70-200mm 2.8IS and 300L 4.0IS
i'd love to have a wide angle lens for the landscape, but 24mm is simply not wide enough on a cropped sensor

my thought so far, is to sell my 40d and 300L to raise fund for the new full frame
so that i get the true 35mm coverage and the better image quality
what would you do? please give me suggestion....
any advice is much appreciated

thanks

Cheong



nrferguson
Registered: Apr 20, 2004
Total Posts: 849
Country: United Kingdom

I bought a 5D Mk2 this spring to go with my 40D and have never regretted it. The 17-40L is a perfect match as a wide-angle which it never was on the 40D



Ian.Dobinson
Registered: Feb 18, 2007
Total Posts: 9093
Country: United Kingdom

question is how much do you want a new body over keeping the 300/4?
Also is your current computer setup good enough to cope with the files + also does you software support the 5d2 or will you have to upgrade that as well?

If its just the quest for a wide then why not look towards an UWA for your cropper now.n I just got a 40D and 24-105 as my main lens + also the tokina 12-24 and just having come back from France those 2 made a good combo on the 40D

All that said if I had the chance then I think I would jump at the 5d2 as well



PetKal
Registered: Sep 06, 2007
Total Posts: 18525
Country: Canada

A couple of options which will give ya extra width without the expense of megasensor 5D MkII:
(1) Replace 40D with 5D Mk I, or...
(2) Buy EF-S 10-22mm.....now you are talking real wide.



skibum5
Registered: Jan 21, 2005
Total Posts: 10231
Country: United States

himcheong wrote:
Hi guys
i am going away for france at late august, and i'm thinking is this a good time to get a 5D mark ii
for the trip?? or should i stay at what i have right now...?
I have a 40D, 24-105L, 70-200mm 2.8IS and 300L 4.0IS
i'd love to have a wide angle lens for the landscape, but 24mm is simply not wide enough on a cropped sensor

my thought so far, is to sell my 40d and 300L to raise fund for the new full frame
so that i get the true 35mm coverage and the better image quality
what would you do? please give me suggestion....
any advice is much appreciated

thanks

Cheong


sell the 24-150 and get a 17-55 IS (or tamron 17-50 if you can live without IS)

or go for the 5D2, I think you'd want more than 24mm on APS-C for France



molson
Registered: Oct 30, 2002
Total Posts: 8134
Country: Canada

The best bang for your buck would be to add an EF-S 10-22 to use with your 40D.



Daan B
Registered: Aug 16, 2007
Total Posts: 7157
Country: Netherlands

molson wrote:
The best bang for your buck would be to add an EF-S 10-22 to use with your 40D.


+1



tyreman
Registered: Mar 15, 2008
Total Posts: 72
Country: Canada

40D is a very Good camera.



jrscls
Registered: Sep 07, 2005
Total Posts: 1278
Country: United States

5D MK II and the 24-105 will make a great travel kit. I would add a fast prime and if you want wider, get the 17-40 L.



tmr_wa
Registered: Sep 07, 2004
Total Posts: 1023
Country: United States

I would hold on to the 40D if at all possible. It's nice to have a backup, and the 40D is a great camera.

Then, one question becomes: How much do you use the 300/4? If you haven't used the lens in several months, and you don't plan on using it in the near future (e.g., you can articulate a need for the lens), then you likely won't miss it too much. I recently sold several lenses that I rarely used and I haven't missed them yet, but I knew that I wouldn't miss something I didn't use very often!


--tom



kewlcanon
Registered: Mar 28, 2009
Total Posts: 3162
Country: United States

Either add 17-40mm or 10-22mm.



philber
Registered: May 21, 2008
Total Posts: 5804
Country: France

I upgraded from a 40D to a 5D MkII by selling a 300 f:4 IS... and a 100mm f:2.8. And never looked back, even though 40D was a camera I really liked. Better LCD, micro-adjust, high-ISO, full format, much better viewfinder, you have a lot of goodies waiting for you.
You will be fine with your 2 lenses. If you have to have an ultra-wide, 17-40 will help, but your 5D would already give you a much wider use of 24-105 than what you have today. Have fun!



Pixel Perfect
Registered: Aug 16, 2004
Total Posts: 15941
Country: Australia

Tokina 12-24, Canon 10-22 or Sigma 10-22 f/3.5 if you need much wider. But I'd also take a fast prime like a 50 f/1.4.



hfillmore
Registered: Dec 15, 2005
Total Posts: 1153
Country: United States

a 10-22 will solve all your problems. Think of it this way:

If you have to sell your 300 to buy a 5d, you'll increase your options on the wide and loose options on the long end.

Buy the 10-22, and you'll increase your options on the wide end, and still have all your options on the long end

ADDENDUM: Pick up a used 10-22 on FM, and it's one of those lenses that you won't loose anything on when you go to sell it. It's truly a special lens. Stellar IQ, contrast, sharpness, flare resistance. If I could have only ONE lens with me to tour europe, that would be the one. A great match for the 24-105. On a crop camera, it's roughly equivalent in FL to the 17-40 on the 5D.

Just add the 10-22, increase your options, and save the money. With some of what you save, maybe add the 50 1.8 for 85 bucks, and you've got a great 3 lens package for France.

Harvey

Harvey



snooked123
Registered: Feb 12, 2006
Total Posts: 651
Country: United States

40d + 10-22mm or 5d + 17-40mm.



David Baldwin
Registered: Jun 28, 2007
Total Posts: 2198
Country: United Kingdom

You might want to consider a Tokina 12-24 for the 40D (a combination I know well). Cheap, sharp and very well built.



abam
Registered: Apr 25, 2005
Total Posts: 4201
Country: United States

40D + 10-22.

you can always sell your 300mm if you aren't using it, and just save the extra money.



MountainTop
Registered: Mar 27, 2008
Total Posts: 339
Country: United States

<devil appears on shoulder and whispers into ear>

Borrow a 5D II and shoot a little to see if you like it. It can't hurt to just shoot a few frames with a Mark II...



Mirek Elsner
Registered: Oct 03, 2005
Total Posts: 721
Country: United States

my thought so far, is to sell my 40d and 300L to raise fund for the new full frame so that i get the true 35mm coverage and the better image quality what would you do?

First I thought the answer depends more on what are you going to shoot then where, but I can't see any area where the 40D would be better (unless this is a birding trip).

- 5D2 has better resolution for landscapes
- 5D2 has probably better high iso performance for night life
- 5D2, even though the body itself is heavier than 40D, makes relatively lightweight and useful combo with 50mm lens for long strolls in Paris or elsewhere.



ohyeah
Registered: Apr 11, 2004
Total Posts: 309
Country: United States

If you absolutely need FF, then the choice is obvious. However, the EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM is a fantastic lens that will give you wide coverage as well as a decent zoom range. Yeah, the 10-22 is crazy wide, but I haven't seen too many 10mm shots that I really liked. Way too much distortion for my tastes. I've used my brother's 40D + 17-55 and REALLY liked that combo. The 40D really is a great camera. But it's not FF...

Have you thought about renting? You could rent an EF-S 17-55 as well as the 5D2 (with your 70-200 lens (which is just amazing on the 5D2), and have an awesome zoom range without having to change lenses. However, that's a lot of gear. If you're trying to keep the amount of gear to a minimum, I'd suggest buying or renting the 17-55 for your 40D and bringing the 70-200.

HTH,
Brian



1
   2   end