|
sunpole Registered: Jan 04, 2009 Total Posts: 310 Country: United States |
Hi all, |
|
Jeff Adukinas Registered: Nov 04, 2006 Total Posts: 15 Country: United States |
I use a Flipside 300 and it holds a surprising amount of gear. I like the fact that I don't have to take it completely off to change gear. I have put a D300 with grip, 70-300VR, 18-105VR, SB-800, Sigma 10-20, 30/1.4 extra cf cards, a few filters and that doesn't include the outer zipped pocket on the side of the bag. It will also carry my Calumet 7100 (lightweight hiking) tripod on the outside and the water bottle pocket works very well. I found the 400 to be a little too big and the 200 wasn't quite big enough for the extra accessories. It is comfortable enough to wear all day without getting a sore back. The only shortcoming I have found is the waistbelt could be a little wider, but it works ok as is. If it had a wider padded belt like the 400, it would be the perfect bag. |
|
sunpole Registered: Jan 04, 2009 Total Posts: 310 Country: United States |
I totally agree with your finding with my research. I like the AW with the 400 and as well as the padded belt from 400, but size wise I think 300 is a perfect compact bag while 400 appears too big to me. |
|
Jeff Adukinas Registered: Nov 04, 2006 Total Posts: 15 Country: United States |
I'm pretty sure the exterior material is the same on all of the Flipsides. The only thing that the 400 has extra to make it AW is the pull out cover that is used to wrap around the bag to keep it dry. |
|
victorXT Registered: Jul 21, 2006 Total Posts: 227 Country: Netherlands |
Another big plus of the 400 over the 300 is the seperate compartment on the back for non camera gear. |
|
sunpole Registered: Jan 04, 2009 Total Posts: 310 Country: United States |
Jeff Adukinas wrote: |