|
jdiperna Registered: Jan 05, 2006 Total Posts: 135 Country: United States |
I apologize if this is an old topic, but I'll still ask. I played with this lens yesterday at B&H and the focus was extremely slow. I'm looking at it for weddings, available light work in church and such. If you are using it under these conditions, I'd be interested in hearing your opinions. |
|
MSC Registered: Feb 15, 2005 Total Posts: 11310 Country: United States |
It is very slow compared to nearly any other lens. But fast enough for the kind of subjects you are talking about shooting...and the 1.2 gives you options that no other lens can in lowlight (or in any light for the bokeh affects). Did you try the Version II of the lens? Still slow as a dog but faster than the Version I. |
|
Tad Killian Registered: Sep 20, 2005 Total Posts: 3024 Country: United States |
HERE ya go. |
|
Seth Tower Registered: Oct 10, 2006 Total Posts: 3751 Country: United States |
The AF module has an enormous amount of glass to move, hence the slow focus. The Mark II version is noticeably faster, but by no means fast. |
|
MrAdventure Registered: Jun 13, 2008 Total Posts: 2878 Country: Canada |
this is a well documented feature of the lens...google is your friend. |
|
bobbytan Registered: Feb 03, 2004 Total Posts: 5597 Country: United States |
Slow is relative. It's really fast compared to my AF-confirm alt lenses! |
|
Aberdeen Photo Registered: Mar 10, 2006 Total Posts: 3812 Country: United States |
Jim, |
|
TeeJay Registered: Apr 08, 2005 Total Posts: 664 Country: United States |
It's not as bad as I thought it would be. I just got my 85L 2 weeks ago and was worried about all the slow AF talk. It's nowhere near too slow for weddings or portrait work. Chasing kids around for snapshots, now that's another story, although my 7 month old son faired well: ![]() ![]() |
|
R. Eisenberg Registered: Jan 21, 2003 Total Posts: 786 Country: France |
This is one of those rare instances where all the good things that you hear about a piece of equipment are true. Of course, they come at a price, and these are to my mind the weight and relative slowness in focus acquisition of the lens. Of course, when carrying the lens with a full bag for several hours, you will slow down too. But I suspect that when you see the special quality of the images that it can produce, you will find that these drawbacks are offset. |
|
jfulton Registered: Oct 24, 2003 Total Posts: 3158 Country: United States |
Yes, it's no speed demon, but I learned to appreciate slowing down for critical focus. I usually manually and instinctually rack the focus close to the range before I even AF to help. It's totally worth the effort and it doesn't bother me especially considering the results. It's a go to for situations like bridal portraits. |
|
bobbytan Registered: Feb 03, 2004 Total Posts: 5597 Country: United States |
The bottom line is the 85L is generally/maybe too slow for fast-action sports and birds-in-flight but it's definitely not too slow for portraits and weddings. PetKal has done some incredible BIF shots with the 85L to prove the point that the 85L can be used to shoot almost anything really: |
|
jdiperna Registered: Jan 05, 2006 Total Posts: 135 Country: United States |
Thanks for all the feedback. Right after I pay for my daughter's wedding, the 5DMii and 85 f1.2 will be next. |
|
cmM. Registered: May 07, 2004 Total Posts: 860 Country: United States |
It's slow. The only slower focusing lens I own is a manual focus Carl Zeiss |
|
lovinglife Registered: Mar 11, 2008 Total Posts: 2815 Country: United States |
Think of it this way - |
|
joezasada Registered: Feb 25, 2005 Total Posts: 3018 Country: Canada |
The 85L II isn't really 'slow' - it's 'precise' - the focus ring moves a lot further than the average lens, and since the AF motor has to move that much, it seems slower. |
|
PetKal Registered: Sep 06, 2007 Total Posts: 18526 Country: Canada |
bobbytan wrote: |
|
Hask Registered: Dec 19, 2007 Total Posts: 110 Country: Netherlands |
I'm no lens expert, but wouldn't this lens be a heck of a lot faster if it was rear-focussing? No need to move heavy elements in that case... |
|
Sahid Limon Registered: Jan 24, 2007 Total Posts: 2211 Country: United States |
I've used the 85L for 4 of my weddings in the past. The lens is fan-freakin-tastic in almost everything except the focus speed. The first wedding I covered was during the day, and I instantly fell in love with the lens. However, the second wedding was when I experienced the bad side of slow focus from this gem. The reception started in the evening and went on till the night, with very low light. I tried to get the lens to focus for dance shots, but it was so slow, that I was missing most of the action. When it would finally focus, it would re-focus again since people were moving, and it would take a while to lock on again... and ultimately miss focus. I ended up switching to the 50mm f/1.4, and just using that to get the shots. The lens was so slow, that I ended up missing some good action shots. On another wedding, the lens was fantastic again for the most part, but at the reception in a dimly lit hotel, it was hard to focus once again... and quite annoying to be honest. As a wedding photographer, I have a strange love-hate relationship with this lens. I love this lens to death, and am more than likely going to purchase it anyway since it's so nice and sharp. Infact, it's one of the sharpest lenses I've ever used to this day. However, the slow AF really annoys me for wedding work, and I wish there was a way around it. |
|
Daan B Registered: Aug 16, 2007 Total Posts: 7157 Country: Netherlands |
Sahid Limon wrote: |