|
dwweiche Registered: Apr 19, 2009 Total Posts: 1144 Country: United States |
First off, no, I don't know how I would explain to my fiance why a $1400 lens appeared in the mail. |
|
tmr_wa Registered: Sep 07, 2004 Total Posts: 1023 Country: United States |
The 100-400 is a great lens, especially if you need/want the extra reach beyond what a "normal" telephoto zoom gets you. It is a heavy lens (wildlife photographers can stop laughing now), relative to what I like to carry, but it's not very long so it fits nicely in smaller camera bags. But, it is quite an investment if the lens is not going to be used very often. If it's just for a weekend, it might be wise to rent one -- but if you think you'll get consistent use out of it and can afford it (see below), then you'll probably really enjoy the extra reach. |
|
SoCalHaze Registered: Jan 20, 2006 Total Posts: 295 Country: United States |
Let her get used to the idea of lenses appearing in the mail before you are man and wife. A lot harder to change the rules once the I DO's happen! :-) |
|
tanglefoot47 Registered: Oct 12, 2004 Total Posts: 14175 Country: United States |
Do it and forget Ebay buy from a place liek B&H, www.allenscamera.com but you must call them as they are still building their website, Canoga camera, Adorama to name a few. |
|
Rob Whiting Registered: Sep 05, 2006 Total Posts: 468 Country: United States |
I bought a 100-400 2 weeks ago for a trip to photograph puffins in Maine. I wanted to rent one, but no one had it in stock so I couldn't get it in time. I had every intention of selling it after the trip as I already have the 500 f/4 IS, 300 f/4 IS, 70-200 f/2.8 IS, I didn't think I'd need it. |
|
dancam Registered: Nov 13, 2008 Total Posts: 1627 Country: United States |
The 100-400L is awesome! I have had mine for a while and am still absolutely thrilled with it. It is an excellent airshow lens, very versatile. I wish I had some pictures but, I'm at work. I'll try to post some tomorrow. I'll be at the EAA this year as well with mine. |
|
Billingham Registered: Aug 06, 2004 Total Posts: 316 Country: United Kingdom |
Go for it, you won't regret it. |
|
parkap Registered: Apr 26, 2009 Total Posts: 113 Country: Australia |
I absolutely love my 100-400. If your partner truely loves you she'll love the lens once she sees how much joy it brings to your life... |
|
Lance Couture Registered: Aug 08, 2007 Total Posts: 2121 Country: Canada |
I just bought one for a national level event I am covering at the end of the month (the 70-200/2.8 + 1.4 TC just wasnt cutting it any more). |
|
GeorgeK-NJ Registered: Feb 12, 2006 Total Posts: 1380 Country: United States |
It's easier to ask for forgiveness then ask for permission, JUST BUY IT!!! I love mine. |
|
Philip Johnson Registered: Apr 16, 2007 Total Posts: 23 Country: United States |
I've been using my 100-400 at the EAA for several years now and it works great. I use it with a 1DMKIIN body. I would recommend not buying this lens off of ebay as there are some bad copies of the lens. Go to Samy's or B&H and just pay the full price. I can't make it to the EAA this year so have a great time. |
|
Alistair Watson Registered: Mar 21, 2005 Total Posts: 5848 Country: United Kingdom |
I can't help with your need to justify a $1400 lens to your fiancee... |
|
Pixel Perfect Registered: Aug 16, 2004 Total Posts: 15941 Country: Australia |
Awesome lens, but if you do a lot of fast action stuff like birding, the 400 f/5.6L is a better choice for the much faster AF speed. Otherwise it's a must have IMO. |
|
edean Registered: Apr 16, 2009 Total Posts: 182 Country: United Kingdom |
A few airshow pics with a 100-400L on a 20D. ![]() 2 ![]() 3 ![]() 4 ![]() 5 ![]() 6 ![]() 7 ![]() |
|
allroad Registered: Jun 28, 2009 Total Posts: 98 Country: United States |
I love mine. I also reflect most comments here about the benefit of the light weight factor. This thing weighs nothing compared to my 300 2.8 IS. It's also easier to lug around everywhere. You should definitely get it if you can. |
|
Yakim Peled Registered: Nov 18, 2004 Total Posts: 15670 Country: Israel |
dwweiche wrote: |
|
sperraglia Registered: Oct 22, 2002 Total Posts: 778 Country: United States |
The 100-400mm was my first L lens. I thought about selling it and was responding to an offer earlier this week, but ended up looking at some of the pictures I had taken with it and kept it. It is a great investment and just be honest with her. |
|
gtjohnson Registered: Apr 09, 2008 Total Posts: 449 Country: United States |
I have a 70-200 2.8, but the first lens I reach for to shoot almost any outdoor event is my 100-400 (sports, picnics, airshows, wildlife, etc.). The 70-200 2.8 is almost exclusively an indoor / low light lens at this point. As was mentioned, it's relatively short when at 100mm, so it's a lot easier to tote than, say, a 400mm 5.6 prime. Yes, you will likely shoot the airshow at 400mm exclusively, but if you're keeping the lens you'll find much more use for it with the zoom range. My guess is that your other zoom will soon become a paper weight. It's a lot of coin, but, as you mentioned, it loses little value on the used market (expecially a recent copy), so if you find it sitting on the shelf too often, then sell it. The money you sacrifice will likely be similar to what you'd pay if you rented it in the first place. |
|
gtjohnson Registered: Apr 09, 2008 Total Posts: 449 Country: United States |
Was just strolling through the forum and came across this thread (see link below). If this doesn't put you into a 100-400, then nothing else will ... |