|
Ethan Schaefer Registered: Nov 03, 2008 Total Posts: 239 Country: United States |
|
|
Matt Leitholt Registered: May 27, 2008 Total Posts: 3458 Country: United States |
Interesting, I think it has too much contrast though, maybe back it off 10%? |
|
farley Registered: Jan 26, 2003 Total Posts: 967 Country: United States |
I find this to be a nice execution of a high contrast photo. I must admit that I am not much of a fan of high contrast photo though. |
|
Ethan Schaefer Registered: Nov 03, 2008 Total Posts: 239 Country: United States |
Thanks for the feedback guys. |
|
TJ Krusinski Registered: Nov 03, 2008 Total Posts: 595 Country: United States |
I like them (well maybe because I'm in both |
|
greswolde Registered: May 04, 2006 Total Posts: 1221 Country: United Kingdom |
I agree its a little heavy on contrast, after you have cranked it up some, have you tried giving the midtones a flick brighter with either curves or levels, i find it sometimes keeps the high contrast look but stops it from looking underexposed |
|
Ethan Schaefer Registered: Nov 03, 2008 Total Posts: 239 Country: United States |
|
|
TJ Krusinski Registered: Nov 03, 2008 Total Posts: 595 Country: United States |
That looks a little less "gritty". I think it's a bit of a different look than the others. |
|
Ethan Schaefer Registered: Nov 03, 2008 Total Posts: 239 Country: United States |
Like I said, less contrast |
|
TJ Krusinski Registered: Nov 03, 2008 Total Posts: 595 Country: United States |
Indeed. It's all a matter of taste I suppose. To each his own. |
|
Ethan Schaefer Registered: Nov 03, 2008 Total Posts: 239 Country: United States |
How do you fit into your pants? |
|
Nathan Soliz Registered: Jan 03, 2007 Total Posts: 15 Country: United States |
I like it! |