|
John64 Registered: Jun 17, 2006 Total Posts: 132 Country: United States |
Canon 135/2.0 L and 70-200/4.0 L IS, both lens almost the same price at B&H, so which one do you choice? I like to get one for event and wedding. |
|
Grantland Registered: Aug 17, 2002 Total Posts: 2574 Country: United States |
135L for me. i shoot indoor sports and fast glass is a must. for portrait work the bokeh is very nice with the 135. |
|
Greg Feldman Registered: Mar 14, 2005 Total Posts: 5841 Country: United States |
One is a superfast prime lens; the other lets in one-quarter of the light but is a zoom lens with IS. |
|
WebDog Registered: Dec 20, 2003 Total Posts: 1221 Country: Sweden |
Now that is a trick question |
|
tbartick Registered: Mar 08, 2006 Total Posts: 582 Country: United States |
WebDog wrote: |
|
thedigitalbean Registered: Jun 24, 2005 Total Posts: 5985 Country: United States |
WebDog wrote: |
|
jcolwell Registered: Feb 10, 2005 Total Posts: 11358 Country: Canada |
WebDog wrote: |
|
Ulff Registered: Jun 13, 2003 Total Posts: 611 Country: Germany |
I do weddings and have both the 135 and the 70-200. The IQ at similar f-stops is almost the same, but I tend to pick up the 135 more often because of its better performance in low light and its wide-open bokeh. For moving people the IS of the 70-200 is of no big advantage. I combine the 135 with a 85mm lens and don't miss the 200mm at all. The 70-200 has its place more in landscape photography for me. |
|
RobertLynn Registered: Jan 05, 2008 Total Posts: 10285 Country: United States |
135 for weddings. The VF will be brighter too with f/2 glass over f/4 glass |
|
dave chilvers Registered: Jan 12, 2002 Total Posts: 1510 Country: United Kingdom |
I stick the 70-200f4Is in the rear pocket of my Domke vest, IQ is very close to the 135 and the focal range is good on the zoom(for walkies) |
|
KFG1 Registered: Apr 14, 2006 Total Posts: 2240 Country: United States |
135L |
|
mfurman Registered: Jan 16, 2005 Total Posts: 2849 Country: Canada |
Ulff: |
|
alvit Registered: Jun 17, 2004 Total Posts: 929 Country: United States |
Me too I'll go for the 70/200 f4 IS |
|
RobertLynn Registered: Jan 05, 2008 Total Posts: 10285 Country: United States |
That IS doesn't do you a bit of good catching people walking or dancing at a wedding though. |
|
tmr_wa Registered: Sep 07, 2004 Total Posts: 1023 Country: United States |
I own both, and I like both very much. The 70-200/4 IS is quite versatile and the image quality is fantastic, but, for a wedding I'd bring the 135L every time. The 135L can produce wonderfully shallow backgrounds, yet the subject remains sharp, even at f/2. I also like that the 135 is a bit shorter, so it fits nicely in my favorite smaller camera bag when attached to the camera. If the 70-200 is attached, I need to carry a larger bag... |
|
andy_king Registered: Jul 06, 2009 Total Posts: 221 Country: Bahamas |
Used both lenses. |
|
willis Registered: Jul 24, 2005 Total Posts: 399 Country: United Kingdom |
I don't shoot weddings but I'd imagine the 70-200 2.8 would be the best option. Of the two you mention in terms of sharpness there is very little to choose between them but only the 85 1.2 can compete with the 135L for bokeh. The F4 is significantly (1-2 stops handholding at 135mm) better for low light if your subject is hardly moving at all while if theres any significant movement the 135 is better IMO. |
|
Emile Gregoire Registered: Sep 09, 2004 Total Posts: 2387 Country: Belgium |
jcolwell wrote: |
|
astrolucida Registered: Jan 07, 2005 Total Posts: 1661 Country: Finland |
WebDog wrote: |