|
jvarszegi Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 3931 Country: N/A |
Pretty humble, but I am finally on my way. ![]() ![]() |
|
Goldenorfe Registered: Apr 15, 2008 Total Posts: 7182 Country: United Kingdom |
good first shots, like 2nd shot best. both too central in frame though. |
|
jvarszegi Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 3931 Country: N/A |
No, not much exposure monkeying in post. Thanks for looking. I like the crops, but agree with you totally about the technique. These were shot at f/22; that plus ISO 400 plus handholding plus use of a non-macro lens plus crappy technique are probably all responsible for the softness. I went out again just now and hopefully got some better ones... shot at ISO 100-200 and lower f-stops. Will post. |
|
Goldenorfe Registered: Apr 15, 2008 Total Posts: 7182 Country: United Kingdom |
using f22 is probably not helping, try f8 which is usuall sharpest on most lenses. |
|
jvarszegi Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 3931 Country: N/A |
Okay, here's the first shot PPed from the second attempt. I think it's better on sharpness and lighting, although obviously no work of art. ISO 200, f/14, 50mm, 48mm of tubes, handheld: ![]() |
|
jvarszegi Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 3931 Country: N/A |
How does my lighting look on these? Here's another, same settings. I figure this little guy was about 2-3 millimeters long. ![]() |
|
jvarszegi Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 3931 Country: N/A |
I think now it may be a pygmy locus, on the order of several millimeters long. But I know very little about these things. |
|
rgopo13 Registered: Oct 08, 2008 Total Posts: 110 Country: Romania |
i like the second one. |
|
LordV Registered: Jan 02, 2006 Total Posts: 24441 Country: United Kingdom |
Look very good for first tries- esp like the hopper shots - light looks very good on a difficult exposure shot with that bright yellow background. |
|
jvarszegi Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 3931 Country: N/A |
Thanks very much for looking and commenting. I am hooked already. I think the funniest part of this is that already it's hard to walk by a single bush without stopping to take a look. |
|
M Vers Registered: Jan 01, 2008 Total Posts: 10333 Country: United States |
jvarszegi wrote: |
|
NumberFive Registered: Jan 31, 2008 Total Posts: 348 Country: United States |
jvarszegi wrote: |
|
adrianr Registered: Mar 21, 2005 Total Posts: 559 Country: United Kingdom |
Shows you don't need to spend a fortune on equipment to get good shots, the locust ones are very good. Agree with other comments about tripod use, I hardly ever use one for macro personally. Others will disagree of course |
|
jvarszegi Registered: Jun 05, 2005 Total Posts: 3931 Country: N/A |
Thanks a lot for the comments and tips. I do have a monopod, a Manfrotto type with the little legs to make it a quasi-tripod. I will start using that. |
|
Goldenorfe Registered: Apr 15, 2008 Total Posts: 7182 Country: United Kingdom |
locust shots much sharper. |